Occupational contact dermatitis II: Risk assessment and prognosis

American Journal of Contact Dermatitis

Volumn 14, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 21-30

  Emmett, Edward A ^a,b  

^a HOSPITAL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

^b Two Silverstein Pavilion   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONTACT DERMATITIS; DOSE RESPONSE; HEALTH HAZARD; HUMAN; HYGIENE; OCCUPATIONAL ECZEMA; OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE; OCCUPATIONAL SKIN DISEASE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROGNOSIS; REVIEW; RISK ASSESSMENT; SKIN ABSORPTION; SKIN ALLERGY; WORKPLACE;

EID: 0041559941     PISSN: 1046199X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2310/6620.2003.38759     Document Type: Review

References (51)

1. Emmett EA. Occupational contact dermatitis I: incidence and return to work pressures. Am J Contact Dermat 2002;13:30-4.
2. Paustenbach D, Leung H-W, Rothrock JA. Health risk assessment. In: Adams RM, editor. Occupational skin disease. 3rd ed. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders; 1999.
3. Lewis PG, Jayjock MA. Risk assessment modeling: allergic contact dermatitis application. Am J Contact Dermat 1994;5:143-9.
4. Fewings J, Menne T. An update of the risk assessment for methylchloroisothiazolone/methylisothiazolone (MCI/MI) with focus on rinse-off products. Contact Dermatitis 1999;41:1-13.
5. American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists. (ACGIH). 2001 TLVs and BEIs. Threshold limit values for chemical substances and physical agents. Cincinnati: ACGIH Worldwide; 2001.
6. Jayjock MA, Lewis PJ, Lynch JR. Quantitative level of protection offered to workers by ACGIH threshold limit values occupational exposure limits. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J 2001;62:4-11.
7. International Study of Asthma and Allergies in Childhood (ISAAC) Steering Committee. Worldwide variation in prevalence of symptoms of asthma, allergic rhino conjunctivitis and atopic eczema. Lancet 1998;351:1225-32.
8. Stamm R. MEGA-Database: one million data since 1972. Appl Occup Environ Hyg 2001;16:159-63.
9. Vincent R, Jeandel B. COLCIC Occupational exposure to chemical agents database: current content and development perspectives. Appl Occup Environ Hyg 2001;16:115-21.
10. Benford DJ, Cocker J, Sartonelli P, et al. The dermal route in systemic exposure. Scand J Work Environ Health 1999;25:511-20.
11. Schneider T, Vermeulen R, Brouwer DH, et al. A conceptual model for assessment of dermal exposure. Occup Environ Med. [In press]
12. Edwards RD, Lioy P. Influence of sebum and stratum corneum hydration on pesticide/herbicide collection efficiencies of the human hand. Appl Occup Environ Hyg 2001;16:791-7.
13. Emmett EA, Risby TH, Liang L, et al. Bioavailability from consumer products and provocation threshold. J Am Acad Dermatol 1988;19:314-22.
14. Menne T, Brandup F, Thestrup-Pedersen K, et al. Patch test reactivity to metal alloys. Contact Dermatitis 1987;16:255-9.
15. Kissel JC, Richter KY, Fenske RA. Factors affecting soil adherence to skin in hand press trials. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 1996;56:722-8.
16. Bronaugh RL. Current issues in the in vitro measurement of percutaneous absorption. In: Roberts MS, Walters KA, editors. Dermal absorption and toxicity assessment. New York: Marcel Dekker; 1998. p. 155-9.
17. Feldmann RI, Maibach HI. Absorption of some organic compounds through the skin in man. J Invest Dermatol 1969;54:339-404.
18. Maibach HI, Feldmann RJ, Milby TH, Serat WF. Regional variation in percutaneous penetration in man: pesticides. Arch Environ Health 1971;23:208-11.
19. Muret P, Leveque N, Broceville H, et al. A new approach for the PUVA-therapy monitoring in psoriatic patients. Ther Drug Monit 2001;23:458.
20. Nethercott J, Paustenbach D, Adams R, et al. A study of chromium-induced ACD with 54 volunteers: implications for environmental risk assessment. Occup Environ Med 1994;51:371-80.
21. Emmett EA. Toxic responses of the skin. In: Doull J, Klaassen CD, Amdur MO, editors. Casarett and Doull's toxicology: the basic science of poisons. 4th ed. New York: MacMillan Publishing Co. Inc.; 1991. p. 463-83.
22. Van der Valk PGM, Maibach HI. Do topical coticosteroids modulate skin irritation in human beings? Assessment by transepidermal water loss and visual scoring. J Am Acad Dermatol 1989;21:519-22.
23. Agner T, Serup J. Sodium lauryl sulphate for irritant patch testing: a dose response study using bioengineering methods for determining skin irritation. J Invest Dermatol 1995;95:543-7.
24. Rystedt I. Hand eczema and long-term prognosis in atopic dermatitis. Acta Derm Venereol Suppl 1985;117:1-59.
25. Leung HW, Paustenbach DJ. Techniques for estimating the percutaneous absorption of chemicals due to occupational and environmental exposure. Appl Occup Environ Hyg 1994;9:187-97.
26. Wahlberg J. Health screening for occupational skin diseases in building workers. Berufsdermatosen 1969;17:184-98.
27. Hogberg M, Wahlberg J. Health screening for occupational dermatoses in house painters. Contact Dermatitis 1980;6:100-6.
28. Pryce DW, Irvine D, English JSC, Rycroft RJG. Soluble oil dermatitis: a follow up study. Contact Dermatitis 1989;21:28-35.
29. Hogan DJ, Dannermaker CJ, Maibach HI. The prognosis of contact dermatitis. J Am Acad Dermatol 1990;23:300-7.
30. Mayr J. Uber das Schicksal von 300 Ekzematikern. Arch Dermatol Syphilol 1938;177:83-9.
31. Burrows D. Prognosis of industrial dermatitis. Br J Dermatol 1972;87:145-8.
32. Cronin E. Dermatitis of the hands in caterers. Contact Dermatitis 1987;17:265-9.
33. Holness D, Nethercott JR. Is a worker's understanding of their diagnosis an important determinant of outcome in occupational contact dermatitis? Contact Dermatitis 1991;25:296-301.
34. Keczkes K, Bhate SM, Wyatt E. The outcome of primary irritant contact dermatitis. Br J Dermatol 1983;109:665-9.
35. Halbert A, Gebauer K, Wall L. Prognosis of occupational chromate dermatitis. Contact Dermatitis 1992;27:214-20.
36. Wilkinson DS. Causes of unexpected persistence of an occupational dermatitis. In: Griffiths WAD, Wilkinson DS, editors. Oxford: Blackwell; 1985. p 111-24.
37. Agrup G. Hand eczema and other hand dermatoses in South Sweden. Acta Derm Venereol (Stockh) 1969;49:61-90.
38. Schmunes E, Keil JE. Role of atopy in occupational dermatosis. Contact Dermatitis 1984;11:174-8.
39. Rosen RH, Freeman S. Prognosis of occupational contact dermatitis in New South Wales, Australia. Contact Dermatitis 1993;29:88-93.
40. Holness D, Nethercott J. Dermatitis in hairdressers. Dermatol Clin 1990;8:119-26.
41. Wall L, Gebauer K. Occupational skin disease in western Australia. Contact Dermatitis 1991;24:101-9.
42. Wall L, Gebauer K. A follow-up study of occupational skin disease in Western Australia. Contact Dermatitis 1991;24:241-3.
43. Brooks SM, Weiss MA, Bernstein IL. Reactive airways dysfunction syndrome (RADS). Chest 1985;88:376-83.
44. Harber LC, Bickers DR. Photosensitivity diseases: principles of diagnosis and treatment. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders; 1981.
45. Mathias CG. Contact dermatitis from use or misuse of soaps, detergents, and cleansers in the workplace. Occup Med 1986;1:205-18.
46. Markey AC, Allen MH, Pitzalis C, MacDonald DM. T-cell inducer populations in cutaneous inflammation: a predominance of Thelper inducer lymphocytes (THI) in the infiltrate of inflammatory dermatoses. Br J Dermatol 1990;122:325-32.
47. Lee Y, Wahn U, Kehrt R, et al. A major susceptibility focus for atopic dermatitis maps to chromosome 3q21. Nat Genet 2001;26:470-3.
48. Cookson WO, Ubhi B, Lawrence R, et al. Genetic linkage of childhood atopic dermatitis to psoriasis susceptibility loci. Nat Genet 2001;27:372-3.
49. Wahlgren CF, Scheynius A, Hagermark O. Antipruritic effect of oral cyclosporin in atopic dermatitis. Acta Derm Venereol 1990;70:323-9.
50. Reitamo S, Wollenberg A, Schopf E, et al. Safety and efficacy of 1 year of tacrolimus ointment monotherapy in adults with atopic dermatitis. Arch Dermatol 2000;136:999-1006.
51. Staughton R. Psychologic approach to atopic skin disease. J Am Acad Dermatol 2001;45:S53-4.