Environmental stress and the effects of mutation

Journal of Biology

Volumn 2, Issue 2, 2003, Pages

  Elena, Santiago F ^a   De Visser, J Arjan G M ^b  

^a Ciudad Politécnica de la Innovación   (Spain)

^b WAGENINGEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

FITNESS; GENE MUTATION; GENOTYPE; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SHORT SURVEY; STRESS; ANIMAL; ENVIRONMENT; GENETICS; MUTATION; PHYSIOLOGICAL STRESS;

ANIMALS; ENVIRONMENT; GENOTYPE; MUTATION; STRESS, PHYSIOLOGICAL;

EID: 0041559706     PISSN: 14785854     EISSN: 14754924     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Short Survey

References (19)

1. Kishony R, Leibler S: Environmental stresses can alleviate the average deleterious effect of mutations. J Biol 2003, 2:14.
2. Kondrashov AS, Houle D: Genotype-environment interactions and the estimation of the genomic mutation rate in Drosophila melanogaster. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 1994, 258:221-227.
3. Kawecki TJ, Barton NH, Fry DJ: Mutational collapse of fitness in marginal habitats and the evolution of ecological specialisation. J Evol Biol 1997, 10:407-429.
4. Gillespie JH, Turelli M: Genotype-environment interactions and the maintenance of polygenic variation. Genetics 1989, 121:129-138.
5. Shabalina SA, Yampolsky LY, Kondrashov AS: Rapid decline in panmictic populations of Drosophila melanogaster maintained under relaxed natural selection. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1997, 94:13034-13039.
6. Fry JD, Keightley PD, Heinsohn SL, Nuzhdin SV: New estimates of the rates and effects of mildly deleterious mutation in Drosophila melanogaster. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1999, 96:574-579.
7. Fernández J, López-Fanjul C: Spontaneous mutational genotype-environment interaction for fitness-related traits in Drosophila melanogaster. Evolution 1997, 51:856-864.
8. Fry JD, Heinsohn SL, Mackay TFC: Heterosis for viability, fecundity, and male fertility in Drosophila melanogaster. comparison of mutational and standing variation. Genetics 1998, 148:1171-1188.
9. Fry JD, Heinsohn SL: Environment dependence of mutational parameters for viability in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 2002, 161:1155-1167.
10. Vassilieva LL, Hook AM, Lynch M: The fitness effects of spontaneous mutations in Caenorhabditis elegans. Evolution 2000, 54:1234-1246.
11. Korona R: Genetic load of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae under diverse environmental conditions. Evolution 1999, 53:1966-1971.
12. Szafraniec K, Borts RH, Korona R: Environmental stress and mutational load in diploid strains of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2001, 98:1107-1112.
13. Coltman DW, Pilkington JG, Smith JA, Pemberton JM: Parasite-mediated selection against inbred soay sheep in a free-living, island population. Evolution 1999, 53:1259-1267.
14. Remold SK, Lenski RE: Contribution of individual random mutations to genotype-by-environment interactions in Escherichia coli. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2001, 98:11388-11393.
15. Stevens L, Yan G, Pray LA: Consequences of inbreeding on invertebrate host susceptibility to parasitic infection. Evolution 1997, 51:2032-2039.
16. Haag CR, Sakwinska O, Ebert D: Test of synergistic interaction between infection and inbreeding in Daphnia magna. Evolution 2003, 57:777-783.
17. Wolf JB, Brodie ED III, Wade MJ: Epistasis and the Evolutionary Process. New York: Oxford University Press; 2000.
18. Peck JR, Waxman D: Mutation and sex in a competitive world. Nature 2000, 406:399-404.
19. Elena SF, Lenski RE: Evolution experiments with microorganisms: the dynamics and genetic bases of adaptation. Nat Rev Genet 2003, 4:457-469.