Outcome, procedure and process: Agency duties of explanation for legal conclusions

Rutgers Law Review

Volumn 48, Issue 2, 1996, Pages 313-

  Lawson, Gary ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0041536908     PISSN: 00360465     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (3)

1. The doctrine derives its name from Chevron U.S.A., Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc., 467 U.S. 837 (1984). The name is misleading, as the Chevron doctrine actually has very little to do with the Chevron decision - but that is a story for another time.
2. Id. at 842-43. Agencies do not administer every statute that they must interpret and apply. The word "administer" in this context is a term of art that the courts have not yet defined with precision. See Gary Lawson, Proving the Law, 86 NW. U. L. REV. 859, 884 n.78 (1992).
3. Chevron, 467 U.S. at 842-43.