Susceptibility corrections in solid state NMR experiments with oriented membrane samples. Part II: Theory

Journal of Magnetic Resonance

Volumn 164, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 115-127

  Ulrich, Reinhard ^a   Glaser, Ralf W ^b   Ulrich, Anne S ^c,d  

^a HAMBURG UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Germany)

^b FRIEDRICH SCHILLER UNIVERSITY JENA   (Germany)

^c KARLSRUHE INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Germany)

^d UNIVERSITY OF KARLSRUHE   (Germany)

Author keywords

Bulk magnetic susceptibility effects; Chemical shift reference; Inhomogeneous line broadening; Lipid membranes

Indexed keywords

BIOLOGICAL MEMBRANES; DEMAGNETIZATION; LIPIDS; MAGNETIC ANISOTROPY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE SPECTROSCOPY; SOLID STATE DEVICES;

CHEMICAL SHIFT REFERENCES;

MAGNETIC SUSCEPTIBILITY;

MEMBRANE PROTEIN;

ANISOTROPY; ARTICLE; ARTIFACT; CHEMICAL MODEL; CHEMICAL STRUCTURE; CHEMISTRY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER SIMULATION; LIPID BILAYER; MAGNETISM; MEMBRANE; MEMBRANE FLUIDITY; METHODOLOGY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; QUALITY CONTROL; SURFACE PROPERTY;

ANISOTROPY; ARTIFACTS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; LIPID BILAYERS; MAGNETICS; MEMBRANE FLUIDITY; MEMBRANE PROTEINS; MEMBRANES; MODELS, CHEMICAL; MODELS, MOLECULAR; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE, BIOMOLECULAR; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; QUALITY CONTROL; SURFACE PROPERTIES;

EID: 0041534396     PISSN: 10907807     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S1090-7807(03)00208-8     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Glaser R.W., Ulrich A.S. Susceptibility corrections in solid state NMR experiments with macroscopically oriented membrane samples. Part I: Applications. J. Magn. Reson. 164:2003;104-114.
2. Mozurkewich G., Ringermacher H.I., Bolef D.I. Effect of demagnetization on magnetic resonance line shapes in bulk samples: application to tungsten. Phys. Rev. B. 20:1979;33-38.
3. Barbara T.M. Cylindrical demagnetization fields and microprobe design in high-resolution NMR. J. Magn. Reson. A. 109:1994;265-269.
4. Kubo A., Spaniol T., Terao T. The effect of bulk magnetic susceptibility on solid state NMR spectra of paramagnetic compounds. J. Magn. Reson. 133:1998;330-340.
5. Durney C.H., Bertolina J., Allion D.C., Christman R., Cutillo A.G., Morris A.H., Hashemi S. Calculation and interpretation of inhomogeneous line broadening in models of lungs and other heterogeneous structures. J. Magn. Reson. 85:1989;554-570.
6. Springer C.S. Physicochemical principles influencing magnetopharmaceuticals. Gillies R.J. NMR in Physiology and Biomedicine. 1994;75-99 Academic Press, Orlando, FL.
7. Hwang S.N., Wehrli F.W. The calculation of the susceptibility-induced magnetic field from 3D NMR images with applications to trabecular bone. J. Magn. Reson. B. 109:1995;126-145.
8. 13C NMR spectra on oriented lipid bilayers: from quantifying the various sources of line broadening to performing 2D experiments with 0.2-0.3. ppm resolution in the carbon dimension J. Biomol. NMR. 24:2002;15-30.
9. 19F-NMR. J. Biomol. NMR. 21:2001;191-208.
10. ii=4π
11. Simonyi K. Theoretische Elektrotechnik. 1979;VEB Deutscher Verlag der Wissenschaften, Berlin.
12. Osborn J.A. Demagnetizing factor of the general ellipsoid. Phys. Rev. 67:1945;351-357. (see [10]).
13. MAPLE, Waterloo, Ont., Canada.
14. MATHEMATICA, Champaign, IL, USA.
15. MATLAB, Natick, MA, USA.
16. Glaubitz C., Watts A. Magic angle-oriented sample spinning (MAOSS): a new approach toward biomembranes studies. J. Magn. Reson. 130:1998;305-316.