Tick Size, Spreads, and Liquidity: An Analysis of Nasdaq Securities Trading near Ten Dollars

Journal of Financial Intermediation

Volumn 9, Issue 3, 2000, Pages 213-239

  Bessembinder, Hendrik ^a  

^a EMORY UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0041526177     PISSN: 10429573     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/jfin.2000.0288     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Ahn H., Cao C., Choe H. Decimalization and competition among exchanges: Evidence from the Toronto Stock Exchange cross-listed securities. J. Finan. Markets. 1:1998;51-87.
2. Angel J. Tick size, share price, and stock splits. J. Finance. 52:1997;655-682.
3. Bacidore J. The impact of decimalization on market quality: An empirical investigation of the Toronto Stock Exchange. J. Finan. Intermediation. 6:1996;92-120.
4. Benston G., Hagerman L. Risk, volume, and spread. Financial Anal. J. 34:1978;46-49.
5. Bessembinder H. The degree of price resolution and equity trading costs. J. Finan. Econ. 45:1997;9-34.
6. Ceron, G. 1999, Stock markets get the point by July 2000, Wall Street J. Sept. 23, p, C1.
7. Chung, R., Kryzanowski, L., and Zhang, H.1997. Decimalizations's winners and losers, Can. Investment Rev.Winter 1996/97, 35-39.
8. Christie W., Schultz P. J. Finance. 49:1994;1813-1840.
9. Dutta P., Madhavan A. Competition and collusion in dealer markets. J. Finance. 52:1997;245-276.
10. Goldstein M., Kavajecz K. Eighths, sixteenths and market depth: Changes in tick size and liquidity provision on the NYSE. J. Finan. Econ. 56:2000;125-149.
11. Griffiths, M, Smith, B, Turnbull, D, and, White, R. 1997, The Relation Between Minimum Tick Size, Order Fragmentation and Market Making Behavior, working paper, Queens University.
12. Hasbrouck, J, Sofianos, G, and, Sosebee, D. 1993, New York Stock Exchange Systems and Trading Procedures, New York Stock Exchange Working Paper 93-01.
13. Harris L. Rev. Finan. Stud. 7:1994;149-178.
14. Harris, L. 1996, Does a Large Minimum Price Variation Encourage Order Exposure?, New York Stock Exchange Working paper #96-05.
15. Harris, L. 1997, Decimalization: A Review of the Arguments and Evidence, University of Southern California Working paper.
16. Huson, M, Kim, Y, and, Mehrotra, V. 1997, Decimal Quotes, Market Quality, and Competition for Order Flow: Evidence from the Toronto Stock Exchange, Working paper, University of Alberta.
17. Jones C., Lipson M. Sixteenths: Direct evidence on institutional trading costs. J. Finan. Econ. 2000.
18. Judge, G, Hill, R, Griffiths, W, Lutkepohl, H, and, Lee, T. 1982, Introduction to the Theory and Practice of Econometrics, Wiley, New York.
19. Kandel E., Marx L. Nasdaq market structure and spread patterns. J. Finan. Econ. 45:1997;61-89.
20. Lee C., Ready M. Inferring trade direction from intra-day data. J. Finance. 46:1991;733-746.
21. Peake, J.1993. Brother can you spare a dime? Let's decimalize the U.S. equity markets!inGlobal Equity Markets: Technological, Competitive and Regulatory ChallengesR. A. Schwartz, Ed., pp. 302-339. Irwin, Chicago, 1995.
22. Porter D., Weaver D. Decimalization and market quality. Financial Manage. 26:1997;5-26.
23. Poterba J., Summers L. Mean reversion in stock prices: Evidence and implications. J. Finan. Econ. 22:1988;27-60.
24. Ricker, J. 1996, Decimal Quotes: The Price is Right, Working paper, 1730 Filbert Street No. 105, San Francisco, CA, 94123, November 1996.
25. Ricker, J. 1998, Breaking the Eighth: Sixteenths on the New York Stock Exchange, Working paper, 1730 Filbert Street No. 105, San Francisco, CA, 94123, November 1996.
26. Ronen, T, and, Weaver, D. 1998, The Effect of Tick Size on Volatility, Trader Behavior, and Market Quality, Working paper, Baruch College, New York.
27. Schultz, P. 1997, Regulatory and Legal Pressures and the Costs of Nasdaq Trading, Working paper, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN.