Intradimensional and Extradimensional Shifts in Spatial Learning

Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes

Volumn 29, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 143-152

  Trobalon, J B ^a   Miguelez, D ^a   McLaren, I P L ^b   Mackintosh, N J ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BARCELONA   (Spain)

^b UK   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANIMALIA;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; ATTENTION; DEPTH PERCEPTION; DISCRIMINATION LEARNING; FEMALE; LEARNING; MALE; MAZE TEST; PROBLEM SOLVING; RAT; TOUCH; VISION;

ANIMALS; ATTENTION; CUES; DISCRIMINATION LEARNING; FEMALE; MALE; MAZE LEARNING; PROBLEM SOLVING; RATS; SPACE PERCEPTION; TOUCH; TRANSFER (PSYCHOLOGY); VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 0041520525     PISSN: 00977403     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0097-7403.29.2.143     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Couvillon, P. A., Tennant, W. A., & Bitterman, M. E. (1976). Intradimensional vs. extradimensional transfer in the discriminative learning of goldfish and pigeons. Animal Learning & Behavior, 4, 197-203.
2. Dias, R., Robbins, T. W., & Roberts, A. C. (1996). Dissociation of affective and attentional shifting by selective lesions of prefrontal cortex. Nature, 380, 69-72.
3. Durlach, P. J., & Mackintosh, N. J. (1986). Transfer of serial reversal learning in the pigeon. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 38B, 81-95.
4. George, D. N., & Pearce, J. M. (1999). Acquired distinctiveness is controlled by stimulus relevance not correlation with reward. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 25, 363-373.
5. Hall, G., & Channell, S. (1985). A comparison of intradimensional and extradimensional shift learning in pigeons. Behavioral Processes, 10, 285-295.
6. Hamlin, P. H. (1975). Observing responses as an index of attention in chickens. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 1, 221-234.
7. Kamin, L. J. (1969). Selective association and conditioning. In N. J. Mackintosh & W. K. Honig (Eds,), Fundamental issues in associative learning (pp. 42-64). Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada: Dalhousie University Press.
8. Krechevsky, I. (1932). Hypotheses in rats. Psychological Review, 39, 516-532.
9. Lashley, K. S. (1942). An examination of the "continuity theory" as applied to discriminative learning. Journal of General Psychology, 26, 241-265.
10. Lawrence, D. H. (1949). Acquired distinctiveness of cues: I. Transfer between discriminations on the basis of familiarity with the stimulus. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 39, 770-784.
11. Lawrence, D. H. (1950). Acquired distinctiveness of cues: II. Selective association in a constant stimulus situation. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 40, 175-188.
12. Lovejoy, E. (1968). Attention in discrimination learning. San Francisco: Holden-Day.
13. Mackintosh, N. J. (1965). Selective attention in animal discrimination learning. Psychological Bulletin, 64, 124-150.
14. Mackintosh, N. J. (1975). A theory of attention: Variation in the associability of stimuli with reinforcement. Psychological Review, 82, 276-298.
15. Mackintosh, N. J., & Little, L. (1969). Intradimensional and extradimensional shift learning by pigeons. Psychonomic Science, 14, 5-6.
16. McLaren, I. P. L., & Mackintosh, N. J. (2000). Associative learning and elemental representations: I. A theory and its application to latent inhibition and perceptual learning. Animal Learning & Behavior, 26, 211-246.
17. O'Keefe, J., & Nadel, L. (1978). The hippocampus as a cognitive map. Oxford, England: Clarendon Press.
18. Pearce, J. M. (1994). Similarity and discrimination: A selective review and a connectionist model. Psychological Review, 101, 587-607.
19. Pearce, J. M., & Hall, G. (1980). A model for Pavlovian learning: Variations in the effectiveness of conditioned but not unconditioned stimuli. Psychological Review, 87, 532-552.
20. Rescorla, R. A., & Wagner, A. R. (1972). A theory of Pavlovian conditioning: Variations in the effectiveness of reinforcement and nonreinforcement. In A. H. Black & W. F. Proskay (Eds.), Classical conditioning: II. Current research and theory (pp. 64-99). Appleton-Century-Crofts: New York.
21. Rodrigo, T., Chamizo, V. D., McLaren, I. P. L., & Mackintosh, N. J. (1994). Effects of pre-exposure to the same or different pattern of extra-maze cues on subsequent extra-maze discrimination. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 47B, 15-26.
22. Rodrigo, T., Chamizo, V. D., McLaren, I. P. L., & Mackintosh, N. J. (1997). Blocking in the spatial domain. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 23, 110-118.
23. Shepp, B. E., & Eimas, P. D. (1964). Intradimensional and extradimensional shifts in the rat. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 57, 357-361.
24. Shepp, B. E., & Schrier, A. M. (1969). Consecutive intradimensional and extradimensional shifts in monkeys. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 67, 199-203.
25. Sutherland, N. S., & Mackintosh, N. J. (1971). Mechanisms of animal discrimination learning. New York: Academic Press.
26. Trobalon, J. B., Sansa, J., Chamizo, V. D., & Mackintosh, N. J. (1991). Perceptual learning in maze discriminations. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 43B, 389-402.
27. Wagner, A. R. (1981). SOP: A model of automatic memory processing in animal behavior. In R. R. Miller & N. E. Spear (Eds.), Information processing in animals: Memory mechanisms (pp. 5-47). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
28. Zeaman, D., & House, B. J. (1963). The role of attention in retardate discrimination learning. In N. R. Ellis (Ed.), Handbook of mental deficiency: Psychological theory and research (pp. 159-223). New York: McGraw-Hill.