Finite nuclear size and Lamb shift of p-wave atomic states

Physical Review A - Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics

Volumn 67, Issue 6, 2003, Pages 621111-621115

  Milstein, A I ^a   Sushkov, O P ^b   Terekhov, I S ^c  

^a BUDKER INSTITUTE OF NUCLEAR PHYSICS   (Russian Federation)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NEW SOUTH WALES   (Australia)

^c Novosibirsk Stale Technical University   (Russian Federation)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ELECTRIC FIELD EFFECTS; ISOTOPES; PERTURBATION TECHNIQUES;

LAMB SHIFT;

ELECTRON ENERGY LEVELS;

EID: 0041509024     PISSN: 10502947     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. S.A. Blundell, Phys. Rev. A 46, 3762 (1992).
2. P.J. Mohr and G. Soff, Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, 158 (1993); T. Beier, P.J. Mohr, H. Persson, and G. Soff, Phys. Rev. A 58, 954 (1998); see also P.J. Mohr, At. Data Nucl. Data Tables 29, 453 (1983); V.M. Shabaev, J. Phys. B 26, 1103 (1992).
3. P.J. Mohr and G. Soff, Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, 158 (1993); T. Beier, P.J. Mohr, H. Persson, and G. Soff, Phys. Rev. A 58, 954 (1998); see also P.J. Mohr, At. Data Nucl. Data Tables 29, 453 (1983); V.M. Shabaev, J. Phys. B 26, 1103 (1992).
4. P.J. Mohr and G. Soff, Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, 158 (1993); T. Beier, P.J. Mohr, H. Persson, and G. Soff, Phys. Rev. A 58, 954 (1998); see also P.J. Mohr, At. Data Nucl. Data Tables 29, 453 (1983); V.M. Shabaev, J. Phys. B 26, 1103 (1992).
5. P.J. Mohr and G. Soff, Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, 158 (1993); T. Beier, P.J. Mohr, H. Persson, and G. Soff, Phys. Rev. A 58, 954 (1998); see also P.J. Mohr, At. Data Nucl. Data Tables 29, 453 (1983); V.M. Shabaev, J. Phys. B 26, 1103 (1992).
6. K.T. Cheng, W.R. Johnson, and J. Sapirstein, Phys. Rev. A 47, 1817 (1993); see also W.R. Johnson and G. Soff, At. Data Nucl. Data Tables 33, 405 (1985).
7. K.T. Cheng, W.R. Johnson, and J. Sapirstein, Phys. Rev. A 47, 1817 (1993); see also W.R. Johnson and G. Soff, At. Data Nucl. Data Tables 33, 405 (1985).
8. I. Lindgren, H. Persson, S. Salomonson, and A. Ynnerman, Phys. Rev. A 47, 4555 (1993).
9. E. Borie and G.A. Rinker, Rev. Mod. Phys. 54, 67 (1982).
10. K. Pachucki, Phys. Rev. A 48, 120 (1993).
11. M.I. Eides and H. Grotch, Phys. Rev. A 56, R2507 (1997).
12. M.I. Eides, H. Grotch, and V.A. Shelyuto, Phys. Rep. 342, 63 (2001).
13. J.L. Friar, e-print nucl-th/0211064.
14. A.I. Milstein, O.P. Sushkov, and I.S. Terekhov, Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 283003 (2002); Phys. Rev. A (to be published).
15. A.I. Milstein, O.P. Sushkov, and I.S. Terekhov, Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 283003 (2002); Phys. Rev. A (to be published).
16. As well as the diagrams shown in Fig. 1, there is also a contribution related to the normalization of the wave function of the bound state. This contribution has been taken into account in the calculation [10], results of which we partly use here. However, the normalization term is not important for the calculation performed in the present work.
17. c. However, from the numerical data [2,3] presented in Fig. 2, we see that all these corrections remain very small up to Z= 100.
18. V.B. Berestetskii, E.M. Lifshitz, and L.P. Pitaevskii, Relativistic Quantum Theory (Pergamon Press, Oxford, 1982).
19. G.P. Lepage, D.R. Yennie, and G.W. Erickson, Phys. Rev. Lett. 47, 1640 (1981).
20. J. Meixner, Math. Z. 36, 677 (1933).
21. See, e.g., U. Jentschura and K. Pachucki, Phys. Rev. A 54, 1853 (1996).
22. The constant in Eq. (21) is different from that presented in the abstract because value in the abstract includes the vacuum polarization as well.