The selection of social actions in families: III. Reproductively disabled individuals and organs

Evolutionary Ecology Research

Volumn 2, Issue 1, 2000, Pages 29-40

  Lloyd, David G ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CANTERBURY   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

Disabled seeds; Endosperm; Feeding anthers; Parent offspring conflict; Self incompatibility; Sterile castes; Sterile pollen

Indexed keywords

EID: 0041492727     PISSN: 15220613     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Bowers, K.A. 1975. The pollination ecology of Solanum rostratum (Solanaceae). Am. J. Bot., 62: 633-638.
2. Bulmer, M.G. 1986. Genetic models of endosperm evolution in higher plants. In Evolutionary Processes and Theory (S. Karlin and E. Nevo, eds), pp. 743-763. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
3. Charlesworth, D. 1984. Androdioecy and the evolution of dioecy. Biol. J. Linn. Soc., 23: 333-348.
4. Charnov, E.L. 1979. Simultaneous hermaphroditism and sexual selection. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA, 76: 2480-2484.
5. Darwin, C. 1859. On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection. London: Murray.
6. Darwin, C. 1877. The Effects of Cross and Self Fertilization in the Vegetable Kingdom. London: Murray.
7. Eisikowitch, D. 1980. The role of dark flowers in the pollination of certain Umbelliferae. J. Nat. Hist., 14: 737-742.
8. Grunmeier, R. 1990. Pollination by bats and non-flying mammals of the African tree, Parkia bicolor (Mimosaceae). Mem. NY Bot. Gard., 55: 83-104.
9. Hamilton, W.D. 1964. The genetical evolution of social behavior I, II. J. Theor. Biol., 7: 1-51.
10. Hamilton, W.D. 1987. Discriminating nepotism: Expectable, common, overlooked. In Kin Recognition in Animals (D.J.C. Fletcher and C.D. Michener, eds), pp. 417-437. New York: Wiley.
11. Kimura, M. 1959. Conflict between self-fertilisation and outbreeding in plants. Ann. Rep. Nat. Inst. Gen. Japan, 9: 87-88.
12. Law, R. and Cannings, C. 1984. Genetic analysis of conflicts arising during development of seeds in the Angiospermophytes. Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. B, 221: 53-70.
13. Lloyd, D.G. 1992. Evolutionary stable strategies of reproduction in plants: Who benefits and how? In Ecology and Evolution of Plant Reproduction: New Approaches (R. Wyatt, ed.), pp. 137-168. London: Chapman and Hall.
14. Lloyd, D.G. 2000a. The selection of social actions in families: I. A collective fitness approach. Evol. Ecol Res., 2: 3-14.
15. Lloyd, D.G. 2000b. The selection of social actions in families: II. Parental investment. Evol. Ecol. Res., 2: 15-28.
16. Maheshwari, P. 1950. An Introduction to the Embryology of Angiosperms. New York: McGraw-Hill.
17. Queller, D.C. 1983. Kin selection and conflict in seed maturation. J. Theor. Biol., 100: 153-172.
18. Queller, D.C. 1984. Models of kin selection on seed provisioning. Heredity, 53: 151-165.
19. Queller, D.C. 1989. Inclusive fitness in a nutshell. Oxford Surv. Evol. Biol., 6: 73-109.
20. Stebbins, G.L. 1974. Flowering Plants: Evolution Above the Species Level. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
21. Trivers, R. 1985. Social Evolution. Menlo Park, CA: Benjamin/Cummings.
22. Westoby, M. and Rice, B. 1982. Evolution of the seed plants and inclusive fitness of plant tissues. Evolution, 36: 713-724.
23. Zangerl, A.R., Berenbaum, M.R. and Nitao, J.K. 1991. Pathenocarpic fruits in wild parsnip: Decoy defense against a specialist herbivore. Evol. Ecol., 5: 136-145.