Comparison of contrast-enhanced CT angiography and gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography in the detection of subsegmental-sized pulmonary embolism: An experimental study in a pig model

Acta Radiologica

Volumn 44, Issue 4, 2003, Pages 403-410

  Seo, J B ^a   Im, Jung Gi ^b   Goo, J M ^b   Chung, M J ^c   Moon, W K ^b   Lee, K H ^b   Kim, I O ^b  

^a University of Ulsan College of Medicine   (South Korea)

^b Seoul National University   (South Korea)

^c Eulji General Hospital   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Animal model; CTA: MR Imaging; Pulmonary embolism

Indexed keywords

BLOOD VESSELS; COMPUTERIZED TOMOGRAPHY; DATA ACQUISITION; GADOLINIUM; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PULMONARY DISEASES;

PULMONARY EMBOLISM;

ANGIOGRAPHY;

CONTRAST MEDIUM; DIAGNOSTIC AGENT; DRUG DERIVATIVE; GADOLINIUM PENTETATE; IOHEXOL; IOPROMIDE;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; LUNG EMBOLISM; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; OBSERVER VARIATION; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SWINE;

ANIMALS; CONTRAST MEDIA; GADOLINIUM DTPA; IOHEXOL; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; OBSERVER VARIATION; PULMONARY EMBOLISM; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SWINE; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 0041475815     PISSN: 02841851     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-0455.2003.00090.x     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Amundsen T, Kvaerness J, Jones RA et al. Pulmonary embolism: detection with MR perfusion imaging of lung a feasibility study. Radiology 1997; 203: 181-5.
2. Bergin CJ, Glover GH, Pauly JM. Lung parenchyma: magnetic susceptibility in MR imaging. Radiology 1991; 180: 845-8.
3. Bergin CJ, Glover GM, Pauly J. Magnetic resonance imaging of lung parenchyma. J. Thorac. Imaging 1993; 8: 12-7.
4. Berthezene Y, Croisille P, Wiart M et al. Prospective comparison of MR lung perfusion and lung scintigraphy. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 1999; 9: 61-8.
5. Biello DR, Mattar AG, McKnight RC, Siegel BA. Ventilation-perfusion studies in suspected pulmonary embolism. AJR Am. J. Roentgenol. 1979; 133: 1033-7.
6. Chen Q, Levin DL, Kim D et al. Pulmonary disorders: ventilation-perfusion MR imaging with animal models. Radiology 1999; 213: 871-9.
7. Daren JE. When can treatment be withheld in patients with suspected pulmonary embolism? Arch. Intern. Med. 1993; 153: 1415-8.
8. Diffin DC, Leyendecker JR, Johnson SP, Zucker RJ, Grebe PJ. Effect of anatomic distribution of pulmonary emboli on interobserver agreement in the interpretation of pulmonary angiography. AJR Am. J. Roentgenol. 1998; 171: 1085-9.
9. Erdman WA, Peshock RM. Redman et al. Pulmonary embolism: comparison of MR images with radionuclide and angiographic studies. Radiology 1994; 190: 499-508.
10. Gefter WB, Hatabu H, Holland GA, Osiason AW. Pulmonary MR angiography. Semin. Ultrasound CT MR 1996; 17: 316-23.
11. Ghaye B, Szapiro D, Mastora I et al. Peripheral pulmonary arteries: how far in the lung does multi-detector row spiral CT allow analysis. Radiology 2001; 219: 629-36.
12. Goodman LR, Curtin JJ, Mewissen MW et al. Detection of pulmonary embolism in patients with unresolved clinical and scintigraphic diagnosis: helical CT versus angiography. AJR Am. J. Roentgenol. 1995; 164: 1369-74.
13. Gupta A, Frazer CK, Ferguson JM et al. Acute pulmonary embolism: diagnosis with MR angiography. Radiology 1999; 210: 353-9.
14. Hatabu H, Gaa J, Kim D, Li W, Prasad PV, Edelman RR. Pulmonary perfusion and angiography: evaluation with breath-hold enhanced three-dimensional fast imaging steady-state precession MR imaging with short TR and TE. AJR Am. J. Roentgenol. 1996; 167: 653-5.
15. Hatabu H, Gaa J, Kim D, Li W, Prasad PV, Edelman RR. Pulmonary perfusion. Qualitative assessment with dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI using ultra-short TE and inversion recovery turbo FLASH. Magn. Reson. Med. 1996; 36: 503-8.
16. Hu H, He HD, Foley WD, Fox SH. Four multidetector-row helical CT: image quality and volume coverage speed. Radiology 2000; 215: 55-62.
17. Huang W, Yen RT, McLaurine M, Bledsoe G. Morphometry of the human pulmonary vasculature. J. Appl. Physiol. 1996; 81: 2123-33.
18. Hull R. Raskob GE, Ginsberg JS et al. A noninvasive strategy for the treatment of patients with suspected pulmonary embolism. Arch. Intern. Med. 1994; 154: 289-97.
19. Hurst DR, Kazerooni EA, Stafford-Johnson D et al. Diagnosis of pulmonary embolism: comparison of CT angiography and MR angiography in canines. J. Vase. Interv. Radiol. 1999; 10: 309-18.
20. Lindblad B, Sternby NH, Berquist D. Incidence of venous thromboembolism verified by necropsy over 30 years. Br. Med. J. 1991; 302: 709-11.
21. Loubeyre P, Revel D, Douek P et al. Dynamic contrast-enhanced MR angiography of pulmonary embolism: comparison with pulmonary angiography. AJR Am. J. Roentgenol. 1994; 162: 1035-9.
22. Markarian B, Dailey ET. Preparation of inflated lung specimens. In: Heizman ER, ed. The Lung: Radiologic-Pathologic Correlations. St Louis: Mosby, 1984: 4-12.
23. Mayo JR, MacKay A, Muller NL. MR imaging of the lungs: value of short TE spine-echo pulse sequences. AJR Am. J. Roentgenol. 1992; 159: 951-6.
24. Mayo JR, Remy-Jardin M, Muller NL et al. Pulmonary embolism: prospective comparison of spiral CT with ventilation-perfusion scintigraphy. Radiology 1997; 205: 447-52.
25. Meaney JF, Weg JG, Chenevert TL, Stafford-Johnson D, Hamilton BH, Prince MR. Diagnosis of pulmonary embolism with magnetic resonance angiography. N. Engl. J. Med. 1997; 336: 1422-7.
26. de Monye W, van Strijen MJ, Huisman MV, Kieft GJ, Pattynama PM. Suspected pulmonary embolism: prevalence and anatomic distribution in 487 consecutive patients. Radiology 2000; 215: 184-8.
27. Nakagawa T, Sakuma H, Murashima S, Ishida N, Matsumura K, Takeka K. Pulmonary ventilation-perfusion MR imaging in clinical patients. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2001; 14: 419-24.
28. Oser RF, Zuckerman DA, Gutierrez FR, Brink JA. Anatomic distribution of pulmonary emboli at pulmonary angiography: implications for cross-sectional imaging. Radiology 1996; 199: 31-5.
29. Patriquin L, Khorasani R. Polak JF. Correlation of diagnostic imaging and subsequent autopsy findings in patients with pulmonary embolism. AJR Am. J. Roentgenol, 1998; 171: 347-9.
30. Reittner P, Coxson HO, Nakano Y et al. Pulmonary embolism: comparison of gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography with contrast-enhanced spiral CT in a porcine model. Acad. Radiol. 2001; 8: 343-50.
31. Remy-Jardin M, Remy J, Artaud D, Deschildre F, Duhamel A. Peripheral pulmonary arteries: optimization of the spiral CT acquisition protocol. Radiology 1997; 204: 157-63.
32. Remy-Jardin M, Remy J, Deschildre F et al. Diagnosis of pulmonary embolism with spiral CT: comparison with pulmonary angiography and scintigraphy. Radiology 1996; 200: 699-706.
33. Schoepf UJ, Holzknecht N, Helmberger TK et al. Subsegmental pulmonary emboli: improved detection with thin-collimation multi-detector row spiral CT. Radiology 2002; 222: 483-90.
34. Stanford W, Reiners TJ, Thompson BH, Landas SK, Galvin JR. Contrast-enhanced thin slice ultrafast computed tomography for the detection of small pulmonary emboli: studies using autologous emboli in the pig. Invest. Radiol. 1994; 29: 184-7.
35. Stein PD, Athanasoulis C, Alavi A et al. Complication and validity of pulmonary angiography in acute pulmonary embolism. Circulation 1992; 85: 462-68.2
36. Stein PD, Henry JW. Prevalence of acute pulmonary embolism in central and subsegmental pulmonary arteries and relation to probability interpretation of ventilation/perfusion lung scans. Chest 1997; 111: 1246-8.
37. Stock KW, Chen Q, Levin D, Hatabu H, Edelman RR. Demonstration of gravity-dependent lung perfusion with contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 1999; 9: 557-61.
38. Tapson VF. Pulmonary embolism - new diagnostic approaches. N. Engl. J. Med. 1997; 336: 1449-51.
39. Tetalman MR, Hoffer PB, Heck LL, Kunzmann A, Gottschalk A. Perfusion lung scan in normal volunteers. Radiology 1973; 106: 593-4.
40. Woodard PK, Sostman HD, MacFall JR et al. Detection of pulmonary embolism: comparison of contrast-enhanced spiral CT and time-of-flight MR techniques. J. Thorac. Imaging 1995; 10: 59-72.