Relevance and speed of message delivery trade-offs in augmentative and alternative communication

Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research

Volumn 46, Issue 4, 2003, Pages 800-817

  Bedrosian, Jan L ^a   Hoag, Linda A ^b   McCoy, Kathleen F ^c  

^a WESTERN MICHIGAN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b KANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE   (United States)

Author keywords

Augmentative and alternative communication; Public attitudes; Relevance and speed; Theory development testing; Utterance based computer systems

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ATTITUDE; AUGMENTATIVE AND ALTERNATIVE COMMUNICATION; COMPUTER PROGRAM; CONVERSATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; MALE; QUESTIONNAIRE; RATING SCALE; SPEECH; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; TECHNOLOGY; THEORY; VELOCITY;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AFFECT; AGED; COGNITION; COMMUNICATION; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PSYCHOLINGUISTICS; QUESTIONNAIRES; TIME FACTORS; VERBAL BEHAVIOR;

EID: 0041473703     PISSN: 10924388     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1044/1092-4388(2003/063)     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Alm, N., Morrison, A., & Arnott, J. (1995). A communication system based on scripts, plans, and goals for enabling nonspeaking people to conduct telephone conversations. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, 3, 2408-2412.
2. Bedrosian, J. L., Hoag, L. A., Calculator, S. N., & Molineux, B. (1992). Variables influencing perceptions of the communicative competence of an adult augmentative and alternative communication system user. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 35, 1105-1113.
3. Bedrosian, J., Hoag, L., McCoy, K., Pennington, C., & Wright, R. (2000, August). An investigation of Grice's cooperative principle: Application to AAC. Paper presented at the Conference of the International Society for Augmentative and Alternative Communication, Washington, DC.
4. Beukelman, D. R., & Mirenda, P. (1998). Augmentative and alternative communication: Management of severe communication disorders in children and adults. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
5. Clark, H. (1996). Using language. New York: Cambridge University Press.
6. Creech, R. (1996a, August). Extemporaneous speaking: Pragmatic principles. Paper presented at the 4th Annual Pittsburgh Employment Conference, Pittsburgh, PA.
7. Creech, H. (1996b, May). Speaker's bureau: System operators. Paper presented at the Minspeak Conference, Wooster, OH.
8. Grant, S. (1995). Using TALK. Communication Matters, 9, 22-25.
9. Grice, H. P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In P. Cole & J. Morgan (Eds.), Syntax and semantics. Volume 3: Speech acts (pp. 41-58). New York: Academic Press.
10. Grove, N., Clibbens, J., Barnett, S., & Loncke, F. (1998). Constructing theoretical models of augmentative and alternative communication. In E. Bjorck-Akesson & P. Lindsay (Eds.), Communication naturally: Theoretical and methodological issues in augmentative and alternative communication. Proceedings of the Fourth ISAAC Research Symposium (pp. 48-64). Dublin, Ireland: Ashfield.
11. Higginbotham, D. J., & Wilkins, D. P. (1999). Slipping through the timestream: Social issues of time and timing in augmented interactions. In D. Kovarsky, J. Duchan, & M. Maxwell (Eds.), Constructing (in)competence: Disabling evaluations in clinical and social interaction. Proceedings of the Fourth ISAAC Research Symposium (pp. 49-82). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
12. Hirst, G., McRoy, S., Heeman, P., Edmonds, P., & Horton, D. (1994). Repairing conversational misunderstanding and non-understanding. Speech Communication, 15, 213-229.
13. Hulley, S. B., & Cummings, S. R. (1988). Designing clinical research. Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins.
14. Kreiman, J., Gerratt, B. R., Kempster, G. B., Erman, G. B., & Berke, G. (1993). Perceptual evaluation of voice quality: Review, tutorial, and a framework for future research. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 36, 21-40.
15. McCauley, R. J., & Swisher, L. (1984). Psychometric review of language and articulation tests for preschool children. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 49, 34-42.
16. McLaughlin, M., & Cody, M. (1982). Awkward silences: Behavioral antecedents and consequences of conversational lapse. Human Computer Research, 8, 299-316.
17. Milliken, G. A., & Johnson, D. E. (1993). Analysis of messy data. Vol. 1: Designed experiments. Boca Raton, FL: Chapman Hall/CRC Press.
18. Ostrom, T. M. (1969). The relationship between the affective, behavioral, and cognitive components of attitude. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 5, 12-30.
19. Schegloff, E. A., Jefferson, G., & Sacks. H. (1977). The preference for self-correction in the organization of repair in conversation. Language, 53, 361-382.
20. Sperber, D., & Wilson, D. (1986). Relevance. Oxford, U.K.: Basil Blackwell.
21. Sudman, S., Bradburn, N. M., & Schwarz, N. (1996). Thinking about answers: The application of cognitive processes to survey methodology. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
22. Todman, J., & Alm, N. (1997). TALK Boards for social conversation. Communication Matters, 11, 13-15.
23. Triandis, H. C. (1971). Attitude and attitude change. New York: Wiley.
24. Vanderheyden, P. B. (1995a). An augmentative communication interface based on conversational schemata. Proceedings of the IJCAI '95 Workshop on Developing AI Applications for Disabled People (pp. 203-212). San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann.
25. Vanderheyden, P. B. (1995b). Organization of prestored text in augmentative and alternative communication systems: An interactive schema-based approach (Tech. Rep. No. AAC9501). Wilmington, DE: Applied Science and Engineering Laboratories.
26. Wiemann, J. M. (1977). Explication and test of a model of communicative competence. Human Communication Research, 3, 195-213.