Talker separation and sequential stream segregation in listeners with hearing loss: Patterns associated with talker gender

Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research

Volumn 46, Issue 4, 2003, Pages 912-918

  Mackersie, Carol L ^a  

^a SAN DIEGO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Hearing loss; Sequential stream segregation; Speech perception; Streaming; Talker separation

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; AUDITORY STIMULATION; CLINICAL ARTICLE; HEARING LOSS; HUMAN; SCORING SYSTEM; SEQUENTIAL STREAM SEGREGATION; SEX DIFFERENCE; SPEECH PERCEPTION; WORD RECOGNITION;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; AUDITORY THRESHOLD; FEMALE; HEARING LOSS, SENSORINEURAL; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; SEX FACTORS; SPEECH INTELLIGIBILITY; VERBAL BEHAVIOR;

EID: 0041473664     PISSN: 10924388     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1044/1092-4388(2003/071)     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Bird, J., & Darwin, C. J. (1998). Effects of a difference in fundamental frequency in separating two speech messages. In A. R. Palmer, A. Rees, Q. Summerfield, & R. Meddis (Eds.), Psychophysical and physiological advances in hearing (pp. 263-269). London: Whurr.
2. Brokx, J., & Nooteboom, S. (1982). Intonation and the perceptual separation of simultaneous voices. Journal of Phonetics, 10, 23-36.
3. 0 contours. Perception & Psychophysics, 54, 303-309.
4. Darwin, C. J., & Bethell-Fox, C. E. (1977). Pitch continuity and speech source attribution. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 3, 665-672.
5. Darwin, C. J., & Hukin, R. (2000). Effectiveness of spatial cues, prosody and talker characteristics in selective attention. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 107, 970-977.
6. Doherty, K., & Lutfi, R. (1996). Spectral weights for overall level discrimination in listeners with sensorineural hearing loss. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 99, 1053-1058.
7. Festen, J. M., & Plomp, R. (1983). Relations between auditory functions in impaired hearing. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 73, 652-662.
8. Glasberg, B., & Moore, B. (1989). Psychoacoustic abilities of subjects with unilateral and bilateral cochlear hearing impairments and their relationship to the ability to understand speech. Scandinavian Audiology, 32, 1-25.
9. Hedrick, M., & Jesteadt, W. (1996). Effect of relative amplitude, presentation level, and vowel duration on perception of voiceless stop consonants by normal and hearing impaired listeners. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 100, 3398-3407.
10. Mackersie, C., Prida, T., & Stiles, D. (2001). The role of sequential stream segregation and frequency selectivity in the perception of simultaneous sentences by listeners with sensorineural hearing loss. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 44, 19-28.
11. Moore, B. (1996). Perceptual consequences of cochlear hearing loss and their implications for the design of hearing aids. Ear & Hearing, 17(2), 133-161.
12. Prida, T. (1999) Auditory performance on the CUNY Simultaneous Sentence Test using a divided- and selective-attention task. Unpublished master's thesis, San Diego State University, San Diego, CA.
13. Rose, M., & Moore, B. C. J. (1997). Perceptual grouping of tone sequences by normally hearing and hearing-impaired listeners. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 102, 1768-1778.
14. Studebaker, G. (1985). A "rationalized" arcsine transform. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 28, 455-462.
15. Summers, V., & Leek, M. (1992). The role of spectral and temporal cues in vowel identification by listeners with impaired hearing. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 35, 1189-1199.
16. 0 processing and the separation of competing speech signals by listeners with normal hearing and with hearing loss. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 41, 1294-1306.