Behavioral graded activity following first-time lumbar disc surgery: 1-Year results of a randomized clinical trial

Spine

Volumn 28, Issue 16, 2003, Pages 1757-1765

  Ostelo, Raymond W J G ^a,b   De Vet, Henrica C W ^b   Vlaeyen, Johan W S ^c   Kerckhoffs, Maria R ^a   Berfelo, Willem M ^c   Wolters, Pieter M J C ^c   Van den Brandt, Piet A ^c  

^a ZUYD UNIVERSITY OF APPLIED SCIENCES   (Netherlands)

^b VU UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^c Inst Res in Extramural Med ^*

Author keywords

Behavioral treatment; Graded activity; Lumbar disc surgery; Randomized clinical trial; Rehabilitation

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BEHAVIOR THERAPY; BIOMECHANICS; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DAILY LIFE ACTIVITY; FEAR; FEMALE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PAIN; PHYSIOTHERAPY; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY; SOCIAL STATUS; SPINE SURGERY; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ADULT; BEHAVIOR CONTROL; CONDITIONING, OPERANT; EXERCISE THERAPY; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; INTERVERTEBRAL DISK; LUMBAR VERTEBRAE; MALE;

EID: 0041472720     PISSN: 03622436     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.BRS.0000083317.62258.E6     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Barrios C, Ahmed M, Artotegui JI, et al. Clinical factors predicting outcome after surgery for herniated lumbar disc: an epidemiological multivariate analysis. J Spinal Disord 1990;3:205-9.
2. Dvorak J, Valach L, Fuhtimann P, et al. The outcome of surgery for lumbar disc herniation. II. a 4-17 year follow-up with emphasis on psychosocial aspects. Spine 1988;13:1423-7.
3. Hurme M, Alaranta H. Factors predicting the result of surgery for lumbar intervertebral disc herniation. Spine 1987;12:933-8.
4. Korres DS, Loupassis G, Stamos K. Results of lumbar discectomy: a study using 15 different evaluation methods. Eur Spine J 1992;1:20-4.
5. Manniche C, Asmussen KH, Vinterberg H, et al. Analysis of preoperative prognostic factors in first-time surgery for lumbar disc herniation, including Finneson's and modified Spengler's score systems. Dan Med Bull 1994;41: 110-5.
6. Manniche C, Asmussen KH, Vinterberg H, et al. Back pain, sciatica and disability following first-time conventional haemilaminectomy for lumbar disc herniation. Use of "Low Back Pain Rating Scale" as a postal questionnaire. Dan Med Bull 1994;41:103-6.
7. Pappas CTE, Harrington T, Sonntag VKH. Outcome analysis in 654 surgically treated lumbar disc herniations. Neurosurgery 1992;30:862-6.
8. Smulders WLM, van Loon G. Nabehandeling na lumbale discectomie of chemonucleolyse. Een 'out-patient' enquête. Fysiopraxis 1993;2:4-6.
9. Spangfort EV. The lumbar disc herniation. A computer-aided analysis of 2,504 operations. Acta Orthop Scand Suppl 1972;95:1421-95.
10. Weber H. Lumbar disc herniation. A controlled, prospective study with ten years of observation. Spine 1983;8:131-40.
11. Ostelo RW, de Vet HCW, Waddell G, et al. Rehabilitation after first time disk surgery. A systematic review within the Cochrane framework. Spine 2003;28:209-18.
12. Kitteringham C. The effect of straight leg raise exercises after lumbar decompression surgery - a pilot study. Physiotherapy 1996;82:115-23.
13. Alaranta H, Hurme M, Einola S, et al. Rehabilitation after surgery for lumbar disc herniation: results of a randomized clinical trial. Int J Rehabil Res 1986;9:247-57.
14. Danielsen JM, Johnsen R, Kibsgaard SK, et al. Early aggressive exercise for postoperative rehabilitation after discectomy. Spine 2000;25:1201-6.
15. Manniche C, Skall HF, Braendholt L, et al. Clinical trial of postoperative dynamic back exercises after first lumbar discectomy. Spine 1993;18:92-7.
16. Vlaeyen JW, Crombez G. Fear of movement/(re)injury, avoidance and pain disability in chronic low back pain patients. Man Ther 1999;4:187-95.
17. van Tulder MW, Ostelo RW, Vlaeyen JW, et al. Behavioral treatment for chronic low back pain: a systematic review within the framework of the Cochrane Back Review Group. Spine 2001;26:270-81.
18. Ostelo RW, de Vet HCW, Vlaeyen JWS, et al. Effectiveness of behavioral graded activity after first-time disc surgery. Eur Spine J, 2003, in press.
19. Ostelo RW, Köke AJ, Beurskens AJ, et al. Behavioral-Graded activity compared with usual care after first-time disk surgery: Considerations of the design of a randomized clinical trial. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 2000;23: 312-9.
20. Fordyce WE. Behavioral Methods for Chronic Pain and Illnesses. St. Louis, MO: Mosby; 1976.
21. Vlaeyen JW, Haazen IW, Schuerman JA, et al. Behavioral rehabilitation of chronic low back pain: comparison of an operant treatment, an operant-cognitive treatment and an operant-respondent treatment. Br J Clin Psychol 1995;34:95-118.
22. Fordyce WE, Fowler RS Jr, Lehmann JF, et al. Operant conditioning in the treatment of chronic pain. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1973;54:399-408.
23. Lindström I, Öhlund C, Eek C, et al. The effect of graded activity on patients with subacute low back pain: a randomized prospective clinical study an operant-conditioning behavioral approach. Phys Ther 1992;72:279-93.
24. Vlaeyen JW, Kole-Snijdets AM, van Eek H. Chronische Pijn en Revalidatie. Hoensbtoek: Bohn Stafleu Van Loghum; 1996.
25. Stegen K, Neujens A, Crombez G, et al. Negative affect, respiratory reactivity, and somatic complaints in a CO2 enriched air inhalation paradigm. Biol Psychol 1998;49:109-22.
26. Tellegen A. Brief Manual for the Multidimensional Personality Questionnaire. Unpublished manual. University of Minnesota; 1982.
27. Roland M, Motris R. A study of the natural history of back pain. Part 1: development of a reliable and sensitive measure of disability in low-back pain. Spine 1983;8:141-4.
28. Beurskens AJ, de Vet HC, Köke AJ. Responsiveness of functional status in low back pain: a comparison of different instruments. Pain 1996;65:71-6.
29. Gommans IHB, Koes BW, van Tuldet MW. Validiteit en responsiviteit van de Nederlandsetalige Roland Disability Questionnaire. Neder Tijdschr Fysiother 1997;107:28-33.
30. Miller RP, Kori SH, Todd DD. The Tampa Scale. Tampa, FL; 1991.
31. Vlaeyen JW, Kole Snijders AM, Boeren RG, et al. Fear of movement/ (re)injury in chronic low back pain and its relation to behavioral performance. Pain 1995;62:363-72.
32. Sullivan MJ, Bishop SR, Pivik J. The Pain Catastrophizing Scale: development and validation. Psychol Assess 1995;7:524-32.
33. Carlsson AM. Assessment of chronic pain. I. aspects of the reliability and validity of the visual analogue scale. Pain 1983;16:87-101.
34. Revill SI, Robinson JO, Rosen M, et al. The reliability of a linear analogue for evaluating pain. Anaesthesia 1976;31:1191-8.
35. Sriwatanakul K, Kelvie W, Lasagna L, et al. Studies with different types of visual analog scales for measurement of pain. Clin Pharmacol Ther 1983; 34:234-9.
36. Beurskens AJ, de vet HC, Köke AJ, et al. A patient-specific approach for measuring functional status in low back pain. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 1999;22:144-8.
37. Ware JE, Jr., Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care 1992;30: 473-83.
38. van der Zee K, Sanderman R, Heyink J. De psychometrische kwaliteiten van de MOS 36-item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) in een Nederlandse populatie. T Soc Gezondheidsz 1993;71:183-91.
39. Bø K, Hilde G, Storheim K. Intra- and interobserver reproducibility of Cybex EDI-320 measuring spinal mobility. Scand J Med Sci Sports 1997;7:140-3.
40. Chiarello CM, Savidge R. Interrater reliability of the cybex EDI-320 and fluid goniometer in normals and patients with low back pain. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1993;74:32-7.
41. Koes B, van Mameren H, Bouter L, et al. De reproduceerbaarheid van metingen aan de wervelkolom met de hoekmeter EDI-320. Neder Tijdschr Fysiother 1989;99:207-11.
42. van Damme S, Crombez G, Vlaeyen JW, et al. [The Pain Catastrophizing Scale: psychometric characteristics and norms]. Gedragstherpie 2000;33: 211-22.
43. Klaber Moffet J, Torgerson D, Bell-Seyer S, et al. Randomized controlled trial of exercise for low back pain: clinical outcome, costs, and preferences. Br Med J 1999;319:279-83.
44. Mannion AF, Muntener M, Taimela S, et al. A randomized clinical trial of three active therapies for chronic low back pain. Spine 1999;24:2435-48.
45. Scientific approach to the assessment and management of activity-related spinal disorders. A monograph for clinicians. Report of the Quebec Task Force on Spinal Disorders. Spine 1987;12(suppl):S1-S59.
46. Pocock SJ. Clinical Trials. A Practical Approach. Chichester, NY: John Wiley; 1991.