Assisting the uptake of on-line resources: Why good learning resources are not enough

Computers and Education

Volumn 41, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 205-224

  Calverley, Gayle ^a   Shephard, Kerry ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHAMPTON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Building; Critical mass; Educational learning; Modeling; Resource collections; Resource uptake

Indexed keywords

EDUCATION; INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY; ONLINE SYSTEMS; RESOURCE ALLOCATION;

EDUCATIONAL COURSES;

EDUCATION COMPUTING;

EID: 0041467290     PISSN: 03601315     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0360-1315(03)00028-9     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Alexander S., Hedberg J. Evaluating technology based learning; Which model? Beatie K., McNaught C., Wills S. Multimedia in education; designing for change in teaching and learning. 1994;233-244 Amsterdam, Elsevier.
2. Anido Luis E., Fernández Manuel J., Caeiro Manual, Santos Juan M., Rodríguez Judith S., Llamas Martín Educational metadata and brokerage for learning resources. Computers and Education. 38:2002;351-374.
3. Bain J.D. Learning centred evaluation of innovation in higher education; introduction. Higher Education Research and Development. 188(2):2000;165-172.
4. Bawden David, Robinson Lyn Internet subject gateways revisited. International Journal of Information Management. 22:2002;157-162.
5. Brown, B., & Crawshaw, T. (2000, November). Electronic diaries: how they are used, advice for implementation and a review of products. University of Surrey, JISC JTAP report. Available: http://www.jisc.ac.uk/jtap/htm/jtap-020-2.html .
6. Calverley, G. (2001, December). How information is structured and made available in the real world. XGrain Learning and Teaching Item, 3D. Available: http://edina.ac.uk/projects/joinup/xgrain/matrix.shtml .
7. Candy P. On the attainment of subject-matter autonomy. Boud D. Developing student autonomy in learning. 2nd ed. 1988;59-76 Kogan Page, London.
8. Casey, J., & McAlpine, M. Writing and using reusable educational materials: a beginner's guide. CETIS Educational Content Special Interest Group Publication. Available: http://www.gla.ac.uk/rcc/staff/mhairi/index.html .
9. Doyle, C., & Robinson, K. (2002). Accessible curricula: good practice for all. A joint UWIC, LTSN Generic Centre & TechDis publication, Univerisity of Wales Institute Cardiff (UWIC) Press (2002) (ISBN 1-902724-53-4).
10. Ellaway, R., Alexander, W., & Mogey, N. (2001, September). How organisations "do" learning technology. In Proc. 8th International Conference, p. 7, p. 161, ALT-C 2002, Edinburgh, UK. Available: http://www.sellic.ed.ac.uk/publicat/staffpub/altpres.htm .
11. Foster, J., Bowskill, N., Lally, V., & McConnell, D. (1999). Preparing for networked collaborative learning: an institutional view. Available: http://www.leeds.ac.uk/educol/documents/00001335.htm .
12. Entwhistle, N. Styles of learning and approaches to studying in higher education. Kybernetes 30(5/6), 593-602.
13. Hara, N., & Kling, R. (2000). Students' distress with a Web-based distance education course: an ethnographic study of participants' experiences. Available: http://www.slis.indiana.edu/csi/wp00-01.html .
14. Individual Styles and Resource Based Learning. (1999). Learning Resources Journal, 15(1) 4-10.
15. Kischner, Paul A., Cognitive load theory: implications of cognitive load theory on the design of learning. Learning and Instruction (12) 1-10 (2002).
16. Land R. Orientations to educational development. Educational Developments. 1(2):2000;19-23.
17. McDowell Liz. Electronic information resources in undergraduate education. British Journal of Educational Technology. 33(2):2002;255-266.
18. McNaught C., Whithear K., Browning G. Systems, not projects. focusing on evaluating overall student experience, rather than isolated innovations Higher Education Research and Development. 18(2):1999;247-259.
19. Muzio Jeanette A, Heins Tanya, Mundell Roger Experiences with reusable learning objects from theory to practice. The Internet and Higher Education. 5:2002;21-34.
20. Oliver, M. What do learning technologists do? Educational Developments, 3(2) 19-21.
21. Ottewill, R. M., Shephard, K. L., & Fill, K. Assessing the contribution of collections of case studies to academic development in higher education. International Journal of Academic Development, 17(1) 51-62.
22. Powell, A., & Lyon, L. (2002, April). The JISC information environment and Web services. Ariadne (31). Available: http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue31/information-environments/ .
23. Rader, H. (1995). Information literacy and the undergraduate curriculum. Library Trends, 44(2) 270-278.
24. Shephard, K. L. (2001). Is it time to reassess the use of video in undergraduate teaching? LTSN Bioscience Bulletin Spring (2), 7. Available: ftp://bio.ltsn.ac.uk/newsletters/ltsn2.pdf.
25. Slouti D. Student voices and course development. reading the signs on a distance course in educational technology Alt-J Association for Learning Technology Journal. 9(1):2001;62-72.
26. Smith, T. (2002). Drivers for the adoption of new/emerging technologies in higher education learning and teaching. Available: http://www.techlearn.ac.uk/Themes/Drivershe.htm .
27. Warburton, S. P. M. Factors affecting changes in educational technology usage within HE establishments. Working document (2000). Available: http://www.telri.ac.uk/Publications/change1.pdf .
28. Wilson, Ruth, & Landoni, Monica (2002). EBONI Electronic Text Book Design Guidelines, 23 March. Electronic Books ON-screen Interface (EBONI). Available: http://ebooks.strath.ac.uk/eboni/ .
29. Wood, N. D., & Hopper, F. W. M. (1999, June). Study into exploring the feasibility of employing groupware within the JISC, IT solutions and services. Available: http://www.jisc.ac.uk/pub01/groupware.doc .