Growth inhibition of bacteria by salsa mexicana

Journal of Food Science

Volumn 68, Issue 6, 2003, Pages 1896-1899

  Orozco, A ^a   Ogura, T ^d   Beltran Garcia, M J ^b   Kubo, I ^c  

^a Research and Development Department   (Mexico)

^b INSTITUTO DE FISIOLOGÍA CELULAR   (Mexico)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^d NONE

Author keywords

Carboxylic acids; Growth inhibition; Hexenal; Microorganisms; Salsa mexicana; Stink bug

Indexed keywords

BACILLUS CEREUS; BACILLUS SUBTILIS; ESCHERICHIA COLI; GRAPHOSOMA LINEATUM; KLEBSIELLA PNEUMONIAE; PENTATOMIDAE; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; STAPHYLOCOCCUS AUREUS;

EID: 0041464743     PISSN: 00221147     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2621.2003.tb06989.x     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Archbold DD, Hamilton-Kemp TR. 2000. Surface disinfection of berry crops with the natural volatile (E)-2-hexenal. In: Florkowski, WJ, Prussia SE, Shewfelt RL, editors. Integr View Fruit Veg Qual. Int Multidiscip Conf. Lancaster, Pa.: Technomic Publishing Co., Inc. p 268-72.
2. Beltrán-García MJ, Estarrón-Espinosa M, Ogura T. 1997. Volatile compounds secreted by the oyster mushroom (Pleurotus ostreatus) and their antibacterial activities. J Agric Food Chem 45:4049-52.
3. Bruin J, Dicke M. 2001. Chemical information transfer between wounded and unwounded plants: backing up the future. Biochem Syst Ecol 29(10):1103-13.
4. Chamberlain K, Pickett JA, Woodcock CM. 2000. Plant signaling and induced defense in insect attack. Mol Plant Pathol 1(1):67-72.
5. De Bruxelles GL, Roberts MR. 2001. Signals regulating multiple responses to wounding and herbivores. Crit Rev Plant Sci 20(5):487-521.
6. Elsworth DH, Telling RC. 1956. The continuous culture of bacteria: a theoretical and experimental study. J Gen Microbiol 14:601-22.
7. Food and Drug Administration. 2002. Priority-based assessment of food additives (PAFA) database number of the Food Additive Safety Profile, #647. Washington, D.C.: Food and Drug Administration. Available from: «http://www.cfsan.fda.gov/~dms/eafus.html». Accessed 2 Jan. 2003.
8. Hammond DG, Kubo I. 2001.Volatile aldehydes as pest control agents. U.S. Pat 6201026. Issued 13 March 2001.
9. Karban R. 2001. Communication between sagebrush and wild tobacco in the field. Biochem Syst Ecol 29(10):995-1005.
10. Ho H-Y, Millar JG. 2001. Compounds in metathoracic glands of adults and dorsal abdominal glands of nymphs of the stink bugs, Chlorochroa uhleri, C. sayi, and C. ligata (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae). Zool Stud 40(3):193-8.
11. Kessler A, Baldwin IT. 2001. Defensive function of herbivore-induced plant volatile emissions in nature. Science 291(5511):2141-4.
12. Krall BS, Bartelt RJ, Lewis CJ, Whitman DW. 1999. Chemical defense in the stink bug Cosmopepla bimaculata. J Chem Ecol 25(11):2477-94.
13. Noordermeer MA, Veldink GA, Vliegenthart JFG. 2001. Fatty acid hydroperoxide lyase: a plant cytochrome P450 enzyme involved in wound healing and pest resistance. Chembiochem 2(7-8):494-504.
14. Norin T. 2001. Pheromones and kairomones for control of pest insects: some current results from a Swedish research program. Pure Appl Chem 73(3):607-12.
15. Ramos-Elorduy J, Pino JM. 1989. Los insectos comestibles en el México antiguo. México, D.F.: A.G.T., Editor S.A. p 17-9.
16. Stransky K, Valterova I, Ubik K, Cejka J, Krecek J. 1998. Volatiles from stink bug, Graphosoma lineatum, and from green shield bug, Palomena prasina (Heteroptera: Pentatomidae). J High Resol Chrom 21(8):475-6.
17. Tromans, A. 2000. Plant biology: volatile defense. Nature 408(6814):785.
18. Van Poecke RMP, Posthumus MA, Dicke M. 2001. Herbivore-induced volatile production by Arabidopsis thaliana leads to attraction of the parasitoid Cotesia rubecula: chemical, behavioral, and gene-expression analysis. J Chem Ecol (27):10-8.
19. Varassin IG, Trigo JR, Sazima M. 2001. The role of nectar production, flower pigments and odour in the pollination of four species of Passiflora (Passifloraceae) in south-eastern Brazil. Bot J Linnean Soc (136):2-14.