Wood thrush (Hylocichla mustelina) nesting ecology in relation to prescribed burning of mixed-oak forest in Ohio

Auk

Volumn 120, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 874-882

  Artman, Vanessa L ^a   Downhower, Jerry F ^b  

^a DEPAUW UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONSERVATION STATUS; FOREST ECOSYSTEM; PASSERINE; POPULATION DECLINE; PRESCRIBED BURNING; RESTORATION ECOLOGY;

(EAST); OHIO; UNITED STATES;

FILICOPHYTA; HYLOCHICHLA MUSTELINA; HYLOCICHLA MUSTELINA; PASSERIFORMES; QUERCUS; TURDIDAE; VERTEBRATA;

EID: 0041422483     PISSN: 00048038     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2307/4090118     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. ABRAMS, M. D. 1998. The red maple paradox. BioScience 48:355-364.
2. ARTMAN, V. L., E. K. SUTHERLAND, AND J. F. DOWNHOWER. 2001. Prescribed burning to restore mixed-oak communities in southern Ohio: Effects on breeding bird populations. Conservation Biology 15:1423-1434.
3. BROOKER, M. G., AND I. ROWLEY. 1991. Impact of wildfire on the nesting behaviour of birds in heathland. Wildlife Research 18:249-263.
4. BURR, R. M., AND R. E. JONES. 1968. The influence of parkland habitat management on birds in Delaware. Transactions of the North American Wildlife and Natural Resource Conference 33:299-306.
5. DELCOURT, H. R., AND P. A. DELCOURT. 2000. Eastern deciduous forests. Pages 358-395 in North American Terrestrial Vegetation (M. G. Barbour and W. D. Billings, Eds.). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
6. DEY, D. 2002a. The ecological basis for oak silviculture in eastern North America. Pages 60-79 in Oak Forest Ecosystems: Ecology and Management for Wildlife (W. J. McShea and W. M. Healy, Eds.). Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, Maryland.
7. DEY, D. 2002b. Fire history and postsettlement disturbance. Pages 46-59 in Oak Forest Ecosystems: Ecology and Management for Wildlife (W. J. McShea and W. M. Healy, Eds.). Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, Maryland.
8. DONOVAN, T. M., P. W. JONES, E. M. ANNAND, AND F. R. THOMPSON, III. 1997. Variation in local-scale edge effects: Mechanisms and landscape context. Ecology 78:2064-2075.
9. FARNSWORTH, G. L., AND T. R. SIMONS. 1999. Factors affecting nesting success of Wood Thrushes in Great Smoky Mountains National Park. Auk 116:1075-1082.
10. FARNSWORTH, G. L., AND T. R. SIMONS. 2000. Observations of Wood Thrush nest predators in a large contiguous forest. Wilson Bulletin 112:82-87.
11. GRIFFITH, D. M., D. M. DIGIOVANNI, T. L. WITZEL, AND E. H. WARTON. 1993. Forest statistics for Ohio, 1991. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service Resource Bulletin NE-128.
12. IVERSON, L. R., M. E. DALE, C. T. SCOTT, AND A. PRASAD. 1997. A GIS-derived integrated moisture index to predict forest composition and productivity of Ohio forests. Landscape Ecology 12:331-348.
13. JOHNSON, D. H. 1979. Estimating nest success: The Mayfield method and an alternative. Auk 96:651-661.
14. JONES, D. D., L. M. CONNER, R. J. WARREN, AND G. O. WARE. 2002. The effect of supplemental prey and prescribed fire on success of artificial nests. Journal of Wildlife Management 66:1112-1117.
15. MARTIN, T. E. 1992. Breeding productivity considerations: What are the appropriate habitat features for management? Pages 455-473 in Ecology and Conservation of Neotropical Migrant Landbirds (J. M. Hagan III and D. W. Johnston, Eds.). Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, D.C.
16. MARTIN, T. E. 1993. Nest predation and nest sites: New perspectives on old patterns. BioScience 43:523-532.
17. MARTIN, T. E., C. PAINE, C. J. CONWAY, W. M. HOCHACHKA, P. ALLEN, AND W. JENKINS. 1997. BBIRD (Breeding Biology Research and Monitoring Database) field protocol. Montana Cooperative Wildlife Research Unit, University of Montana, Missoula.
18. MAYFIELD, H. F. 1975. Suggestions for calculating nest success. Wilson Bulletin. 87:456-466.
19. PONS, P., AND R. PRODON. 1996. Short term temporal patterns in a Mediterranean shrubland bird community after wildfire. Acta Oecologica 17:29-41.
20. RAPPOLE, J. H., AND R. M. DEGRAAF. 1996. Research and effective management of Neotropical migrant birds. Transactions of the North American Wildlife and Natural Resource Conference 61:450-462.
21. ROSENBERG, K. V., AND J. V. WELLS. 1999. Global perspectives on Neotropical migratory bird conservation in the Northeast: Long-term responsibility vs. immediate concern. [Online.] Strategies for Bird Conservation: The Partners in Flight Planning Process (R. Bonney, D. N. Pashley, R. J. Cooper, and L. Niles, Eds.). Available at www.birds.cornell.edu/pifcapemay/rosenberg_wells.htm.
22. ROTH, R. R., M. S. JOHNSON, AND T. J. UNDERWOOD. 1996. Wood Thrush (Hylocichla mustelina). In The Birds of North America, no. 246. (A. Poole and F. Gill, Eds.). Academy of Natural Sciences, Philadelphia, and American Ornithologists' Union, Washington, D.C.
23. SAUER, J. R., J. E. HINES, AND J. FALLON. 2001. The North American Breeding Bird Survey, Results and Analysis 1966-2000. Version 2001.2, U.S. Geological Survey Patuxent Wildlife Research Center, Laurel, Maryland.
24. SAUER, J. R., AND B. K. WILLIAMS. 1989. Generalized procedures for testing hypotheses about survival or recovery rates. Journal of Wildlife Management 53:137-142.
25. SUTHERLAND, E. K., T. F. HUTCHINSON, AND D. A. YAUSSY. 2003. Introduction, study area description and experimental design. Pages 1-16 in Characteristics of Mixed-Oak Forest Ecosystems in Southern Ohio Prior to the Reintroduction of Fire (E. K. Sutherland and T. F. Hutchinson, Eds.). U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service, General Technical Report NE-299.
26. TRINE, C. L. 1998. Wood Thrush population sinks and implications for the scale of regional conservation strategies. Conservation Biology 12:576-585.