On the benefits of collaboration: consumer psychology, behavioral economics and relational frame theory

Managerial and Decision Economics

Volumn 21, Issue 3-4, 2000, Pages 159-165

  Quiñones, Rene ^a   Hayes, Linda J ^a   Hayes, Steven C ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEVADA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0041402178     PISSN: 01436570     EISSN: 10991468     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/mde.980     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Aaker DA. 1996 Building Strong Brands. The Free Press: New York.
2. Aaker DA, Joachimstahler E. 2000 Brand Leadership. The Free Press: New York.
3. Barnes D, Hegarty N, Smeets PM. 1997. Relating equivalence relations to equivalence relations: a relational framing model of complex human functioning. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior 14: 57–83.
4. Barnes D, Healy O, Hayes SC. 2000 Relational frame theory and the relational evaluation procedure: Approaching human language as derived relational responding. In Experimental and Applied Analysis of Human Behavior, Leslie JC, Blackman D (eds). Context Press: Reno, NV; 149–180.
5. Bickel WK, Green L, Vuchinich RE. 1995. Editorial. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior 64: 257–262.
6. Catania AC, Matthews BA, Shimoff EH. 1990 Properties of rule-governed behavior and their implications. In Behavior Analysis in Theory and Practice, Blackman DE, Lejeune H (eds). Erlbaum: Hillsdale, NJ; 215–230.
7. Chernev A. 1997. The effect of common features on brand choice: moderating role of attribute importance. Journal of Consumer Research 23: 304–311.
8. Dominguez LV, Richey B, Exprua J. 1999. A Cross-national study of branding and manufacturing site effects on Latin American consumers' perceptions of product value. Journal of International Consumer Marketing 11: 5–31.
9. Fantino E. 1998. Judgment and decision-making: behavioral approaches. The Behavior Analyst 21 (2): 203–218.
10. Fournier S. 1998. Consumer and their brands: developing relationship theory in consumer research. Journal of Consumer Research 24 (4): 343–373.
11. Green L, Freed DE. 1993. The substitutability of reinforcers. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior 60: 141–158.
12. Haubl G, Elrod T. 1999. The impact of congruity between brand name and country of production on consumers' product quality judgments. International Journal of Research in Marketing 16: 199–215.
13. Hayes LH. 1992 Equivalence as process. In Understanding Verbal Relations, Hayes SC, Hayes LJ (eds). Context Press: Reno, NV; 97–108.
14. Hayes SC. 1991 A relational control theory of stimulus equivalence. In Dialogues on Verbal Behavior, Hayes LJ, Chase PN (eds). Context Press: Reno, NV; 19–40.
15. Hayes SC. 1994 Relational frame theory: a functional approach to verbal events. In Behavior Analysis of Language and Cognition, Hayes SC, Hayes LJ, Sato M, Ono K (eds). Context Press: Reno, NV; 9–30.
16. Hayes SC, Barnes-Holmes D, Roche B (eds). In press Relational Frame Theory: A Post-Skinnerian Account of Human Language and Cognition. Plenum Press: New York.
17. Hayes SC, Hayes LJ. 1992. Verbal relations and the evolution of behavior analysis. American Psychologist 47: 1383–1395.
18. Hayes SC, Barnes D. 1997. Analyzing derived stimulus relations requires more than the concept of stimulus class. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior 68: 235–244.
19. Healy O, Barnes-Holmes D, Smeets PM. 2000. Derived relational responding as generalized operant behavior. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior 74: 207–227.
20. Horne P, Lowe CF. 1997. Toward a theory of verbal behavior. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior 62 (2): 271–296.
21. Hulland JS. 1999. The effects of country of brand and brand name on product evaluation and consideration: a cross-country comparison. Journal of International Consumer Marketing 11: 23–40.
22. Hursh SR. 1980. Economic concepts for the analysis of behavior. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior 34: 219–238.
23. Hursh SR. 2000 Behavioral economic concepts and methods for studying health behavior. In Reframing Health Behavior Change with Behavioral Economics, Bickel WK, Rudy RE (eds). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates: New Jersey.
24. Janiszewski C, Warlop L. 1993. The influence of classical conditioning procedures. Journal of Consumer Research 20: 171–190.
25. Kardes FR, Gurumurthy K, Chandrashekaran M, Dornoff RJ. 1993. Brand retrieval, consideration set composition. Journal of Consumer Research: 62–76.
26. LePla FJ, Parker LM. 1999 Integrated Branding. Quorum Books: Westport.
27. Leslie JC. 2000 Selectionism, relational learning and radical application. In Experimental and Applied Analysis of Human Behavior, Leslie JC, Blackman D (eds). Context Press: Reno, NV; 9–22.
28. Lipkens G, Hayes SC, Hayes LJ. 1993. Longitudinal study of derived stimulus relations in an infant. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 56: 201–239.
29. Neuringer A. 1986. Can people behave ‘randomly?’: The role of feedback. Journal of Experimental Psychology General 115: 62–75.
30. Marconi J. 2000 The Brand Marketing. NTC Business Book: Chicago, IL.
31. Parrott LJ. 1984. Listening and understanding. The Behavior Analyst.
32. Pechmann C, Ratneshwar S. 1991. The use of comparative advertising for brand positioning. Journal of Consumer Research 18: 146–161.
33. Poulson CL, Kymissis E, Reeve KF, Andreatos M, Reeve A. 1991. Generalized vocal imitation in infants. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 51: 267–279.
34. Pryor KW, Haag R, O'Reilly J. 1969. The creative porpoise: training for novel behavior. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior 12: 653–661.
35. Rachlin H. 1980 Economics and behavioral psychology. In Limits to Action, Staddon JER (ed.). Academic Press: New York; 205–306.
36. Rachlin H. 1995. Behavioral economics without anomalies. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior 64: 397–404.
37. Schmitt B, Pan Y, Tavassoli NT. 1994. Language and consumer memory: the impact of linguistic differences. Journal of Consumer Research 21: 419–432.
38. Schmitt B, Zhang S. 1998. Language structure and categorization: a study of classifiers in consumer cognition, judgement and choice. Journal of Consumer Research 25: 108–122.
39. Sidman M. 1994 Equivalence Relations and Behavior: A Research Story. Authors Cooperative Inc: Boston, MA.
40. Skinner BF. 1938 Behavior of Organisms. Appelton-Century-Crofts: New York.
41. Staddon JER. 1980 Optimality analyses of operant behavior and their relation to optimal foraging. In Limits to Action, Staddon JER (ed.). Academic Press: New York; 101–141.
42. Steele DL, Hayes SC. 1991. Stimulus equivalence and arbitrarily applicable relational responding. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior 56: 519–555.
43. Voss KE, Tansuhaj P. 1999. A consumer perspective on foreign market entry: building brand alliances. Journal of International Consumer Marketing 11: 39–58.
44. West P, Brown CL, Hoch SJ. 1996. Consumption vocabulary and preference formation. Journal of Consumer Research 23: 120–136.