Assessment of irregular voices after total and laser surgical partial laryngectomy

Archives of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery

Volumn 129, Issue 9, 2003, Pages 994-999

  Olthoff, Arno ^a   Mrugalla, Sibylle ^a   Laskawi, Rainer ^a   Fröhlich, Matthias ^a   Stuermer, Ingo ^a   Kruse, Eberhard ^a   Ambrosch, Petra ^a   Steiner, Wolfgang ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GÖTTINGEN   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ADVANCED CANCER; AGED; ANALYTIC METHOD; ARTICLE; CANCER STAGING; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPUTER ANALYSIS; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT; GOTTINGEN HOARSENESS DIAGRAM; HUMAN; INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION; LARYNGECTOMY; LARYNX CARCINOMA; LARYNX DISORDER; LARYNX SURGERY; LASER SURGERY; MALE; MICROSURGERY; MULTIDIMENSIONAL VOICE PROGRAM; PROSTHESIS; QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS; QUALITATIVE DIAGNOSIS; SPEECH ANALYSIS; SPEECH INTELLIGIBILITY; SPEECH REHABILITATION; STANDARDIZATION; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; TELEPHONE; VALIDATION PROCESS; VOICE;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; CARCINOMA, SQUAMOUS CELL; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDIES; FEMALE; HOARSENESS; HUMANS; LARYNGEAL NEOPLASMS; LARYNGECTOMY; LASER SURGERY; MALE; MICROSURGERY; MIDDLE AGED; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; QUESTIONNAIRES; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SALVAGE THERAPY; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; SPEECH ACOUSTICS; TELEPHONE; VOICE QUALITY;

EID: 0041384582     PISSN: 08864470     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1001/archotol.129.9.994     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Debruyne F, Delaere P, Wouters J, Uwents P. Acoustic analysis of tracheooesophageal versus oesophageal speech. J Laryngol Otol. 1994;108:325-328.
2. Hilgers FJM, Balm AJM. Longterm results of vocal rehabilitation after total laryngectomy with the low-resistance, indwelling PROVOX voice prosthesis system. Clin Otolaryngol. 1993;18:517-523.
3. Bertino G, Bellomo A, Miani C, Ferrero F, Staffieri A. Spectrographic differences between tracheo-esophageal and esophageal voice. Folia Phoniatr Logop. 1996;48:255-261.
4. Bielamowicz S, Kreimann J, Gerrat BR, Dauer MS, Berke GS. Comparison of voice analysis systems for perturbation measurement. J Speech Hear Res. 1996;39:126-134.
5. Crevier-Buchman L, Laccourreye O, Papon JF, Monfrais-Pfauwadel MC, Brasnu D. Apports et limites de l'analyse acoustique de la voix et de la parole alaryngée au moyen d'un système informatique. Ann Otolaryngol Chir Cervicofac. 1996;113:61-68.
6. Dejonckere PH, Remacle M, Fresnel-Elbaz E, Woisard V, Crevier-Buchman L, Millet B. Differentiated perceptual evaluation of pathological voice quality: reliability and correlations with acoustic measurements. Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord). 1996;117:219-224.
7. Finizia C, Dotevall H, Lundström E, Lindström J. Acoustic and perceptual evaluation of voice and speech quality. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1999;125:157-163.
8. Hanamitsu M, Kataoka H, Takeuchi E, Kitajima K. Comparative study of vocal function after near-total laryngectomy. Laryngoscope. 1999;109:1320-1323.
9. Rihkanen H, Lehikoinen-Söderlund S, Reijonen P. Voice acoustics after autologous fascia injection for vocal fold paralysis. Laryngoscope. 1999;109:1854-1858.
10. Fröhlich M, Michaelis D, Strube HW, Kruse E. Acoustic voice analysis by means of the hoarseness diagram. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2000;43:706-720.
11. Michaelis D, Fröhlich M, Strube HW. Selection and combination of acoustic features for the description of pathologic voices. J Acoust Soc Am. 1998;103:1628-1639
12. Sobin LH, Wittekind C, eds. TNM Classification of Malignant Tumours. 5th ed. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons Inc; 1997.
13. Steiner W, Ambrosch P. Laser microsurgery for cancer of the larynx. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol. 1996;5:159-164.
14. Steiner W, Ambrosch P, eds. Endoscopic Laser Surgery of the Upper Aerodigestive Tract: With Special Emphasis on Tumor Surgery. Stuttgart, Germany: Georg Thieme Publishers; 2000.
15. Kruse E. Voice therapy after laser surgical partial laryngectomy. In: Steiner W, Ambrosch P, eds. Endoscopic Laser Surgery of the Upper Aerodigestive Tract: With Special Emphasis on Tumor Surgery. Stuttgart, Germany: Georg Thieme Publishers; 2000:124-129.
16. de Maddalena H, Zenner HP. Evaluation of speech intelligibility after prosthetic voice restoration by a standardized telephone test. In: Proceedings of the Sixth International Congress on Surgical and Prosthetic Voice Restoration After Total Laryngectomy. San Sebastian, Spain: Excerpta Medica International Congress Series; 1995:183-187.
17. Niemeyer W. Sprachaudiometrie mit Sätzen. HNO. 1967;15:335-343.
18. Hahlbrock KH. Sprachaudiometrie. Stuttgart, Germany: Thieme Verlag; 1957.
19. Mendelsohn M, Morris M, Gallagher R. A comparative study of speech after total laryngectomy and total laryngopharyngectomy. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1993;119:508-510.
20. List MA, Ritter-Sterr CA, Baker TM, et al. Longitudinal assessment of quality of life in laryngeal cancer patients. Head Neck. 1996;18:1-10.
21. Morton RP. Laryngeal cancer: quality-of-life and cost-effectiveness. Head Neck. 1997;19:243-250.
22. Hillman RE, Walsh MJ, Wolf GT, Fisher SG, Hong WK. Functional outcomes following treatment for advanced laryngeal cancer. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 1998;107:2-27.
23. de Krom G. Some spectral correlates of pathological breathy and rough voice quality for different types of vowel fragments. J Speech Hear Res. 1995;38:794-811.
24. Michaelis D, Gramss T, Strube HW. Glottal-to-noise exitation ratio - a new measure for describing pathological voices. Acustica. 1997;83:700-706.