A possibility theory framework for security evaluation in national infrastructure protection

Journal of Database Management

Volumn 14, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 1-13

  Baskerville, Richard L ^a   Portougal, Victor ^b  

^a GEORGIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF AUCKLAND BUSINESS SCHOOL   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

Abuse and crime; Battle space illumination; Information warfare; Intrusion detection; IS security; Military applications; National infrastructure protection; Possibility theory

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER NETWORKS; INFORMATION RETRIEVAL; PROBABILITY; SECURITY OF DATA;

INFORMATION WARFARE;

DATABASE SYSTEMS;

EID: 0041379357     PISSN: 10638016     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4018/jdm.2003040101     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Bacheldor, B. (2000). Clinton, IT execs huddle on anti-hack-attack plan. Informationweek (774), 167.
2. Baskerville, R. (1992). The developmental duality of information systems security. The Journal of Management Systems, 4(1), 1-12.
3. Baskerville, R., & Portougal, V. (2000). A Framework for Evaluation of Security Provided by Firewalls (Working Paper). Atlanta: Georgia State University.
4. Bass, T. (2000). Intrusion detection systems and multisensor data fusion. Communications of the ACM, 43(4), 99-105.
5. Biermann, E., Cloete, E., & Venter, L. M. (2001). A comparison of intrusion detection systems. Computers & Security, 20(8), 676-683.
6. Corr, A. (1983). The Capital Expenditure Decision. Montvale, NJ: National Association of Accountants.
7. Crock, S. (1998). A digital D-day? Business Week, August 31 (3593 Industrial/Technology Edition), 15.
8. Dubois, D., & Prade, H. (1988). Possibility Theory. An Approach to Computerized Processing of Uncertainty. New York: Plenum Press.
9. Durst, R., Champion, T., Witten, B., Miller, E., & Spagnuolo, L. (1999). Testing and evaluating computer intrusion detection systems. Communications of the ACM, 42(7), 53-61.
10. Graham, R. (2001). NIDS - Pattern search vs. Protocol decode. Computers & Security, 20(1), 37-41.
11. Lukasik, S. J., Greenberg, L. T., & Goodman, S. E. (1998). Protecting an invaluable and ever-widening infrastructure. Communications of the ACM, 41(6), 1116.
12. Munro, N. (1996). Sketching a national information warfare defense plan. Communications of the ACM, 39(11), 15-17.
13. Neumann, P. G. (1998). Protecting the infrastructures. Communications of the ACM, 41(1), 128.
14. Panda, B., & Giordano, J. (1999). Defensive information warfare. Communications of the ACM, 42(7), 30-32.
15. Perrow, C. (1984). Normal Accidents: Living With High-Risk Technologies. New York: Basic Books.
16. Pfleeger, C. (1997). Security in Computing (Second ed.). Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.
17. Portougal, V., & Trietsch, D. (2001). Stochastic scheduling with optimal customer service. The Journal of the Operational Research Society, 52(2), 226-223.
18. Richards, K. (1999). Network based intrusion detection: A review of technologies. Computers & Security, 18(8), 671-682.
19. Schultz, E. (2002). New tool makes attacks undetectable. Computers & Security, 21(4), 301-302.
20. Siyan, K., & Hare, C. (1995). Internet Firewalls and Network Security. Indianapolis, IN: New Riders.
21. Zadeh, L. A. (1978). Fuzzy Sets as a basis for a theory of possibility. Fuzzy Sets Systems, 1, 3-28.
22. Zhu, D., Premkumar, G., Zhang, X., & Chu, C.-H. (2001). Data mining for network intrusion detection: A comparison of alternative methods. Decision Sciences, 32(4), 635-660.