Supplemental Instruction: An Effective Component of Student Affairs Programming

Journal of College Student Development

Volumn 38, Issue 6, 1997, Pages 577-586

  Kochenour, Edith O ^b   Jolley, Dennis S ^a   Kaup, John G ^b   Patrick, David L ^b   Roach, Kenneth D ^b   Wenzler, Lisa A ^b  

^a Rowland Hall St Mark's School   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0041378253     PISSN: 08975264     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. American College Personnel Association (1994). The student learning imperative: Implications for student affairs. Washington, DC: Author.
2. Blanc, R., DeBuhr, L., & Martin, D. (1983). Breaking the attrition cycle. Journal of Higher Education, 54 (1), 80-90.
3. Blanc, R., & Martin, D. (1994). Supplemental instruction: Increasing student performance and persistence in difficult academic courses. Academic Medicine, 69, 452-454.
4. Blocher, D. (1978). Campus learning environments and the ecology of student development. In J. H. Banning (Ed.), Campus ecology: A perspective for student affairs [Monograph] (pp. 17-23). NASPA.
5. Burmeister, S., Carter, J., Hockenberger, L., Kenney, P. McLaren, A., & Nice, D. (1994). Supplemental instruction sessions in college algebra and calculus. In D. Martin & D. Arendale (Eds.), Supplemental instruction: Increasing achievement and retention. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 60 (pp. 53-61). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
6. Congos, D., & Schoeps, N. (1993). Does supplemental instruction really work, and what is it anyway. Studies in Higher Education, 18, 165-176.
7. Dwyer, J. (1989). A historical look at the freshman year experience. In The freshman year experience (pp. 25-39). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
8. Kenney, P., & Kallison, J., Jr. (1994). Research studies on the effectiveness of supplemental instruction in mathematics. In D. Martin & D. Arendale (Eds.), Supplemental instruction: Increasing achievement and retention New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 60 (pp. 75-82). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
9. Lockie, N., & Van Lanen, R. (1994). Supplemental instruction for college chemistry courses. In D. Martin & D. Arendale (Eds.), Supplemental instruction: Increasing achievement and retention New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 60 (pp. 63-74). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
10. Lundeberg, M. (1990). Supplemental instruction in chemistry. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. 27, 145-155.
11. Martin, D., & Blanc, R. (1981). The learning center's role in retention: Integrating student support services with departmental instruction. Journal of Developmental and Remedial Education, 4(3), 2-4, 21-23.
12. National Institute of Education. (1984). Involvement in Learning: Realizing the potential of American Higher Education. Washington. DC: Author.
13. Schroeder, C., & Hurst, J. (1996). Designing learning environments that integrate curricular and cocurricular experiences. Journal of College Student Development, 37, 174-181.
14. Schwanz, M. (1992). Study sessions and higher grades: Questioning the causal link. College Student Journal, 26, 292-299.
15. Terenzini, P., Pascarella, E., & Blimling, G. (1996). Students' out-of-class experiences and their influence on learning and cognitive development: A literature review. Journal of College Student Development, 37, 149-162.
16. Visor, J., Johnson, J., & Cole, L. (1992). The relationship of supplemental instruction to affect. Journal of Developmental Education, 16(2), 12-14, 16-18.
17. Wolfe, R. (1987). The supplemental instruction program: Developing learning and thinking skills. Journal of Reading, 31, 228-232.