Cognitive style and kindergarten pupils' preferences for teachers

Learning and Instruction

Volumn 11, Issue 3, 2001, Pages 195-209

  Saracho, Olivia N ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0041368546     PISSN: 09594752     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0959-4752(00)00028-1     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Anastasi A. Psychological testing. 1996;Macmillan, New York.
2. Coates S. Preschool Embedded Figures Test. 1972;Consulting Psychologists Press, Palo Alto, CA.
3. DiStefano J.J. Interpersonal perceptions of field independent and field dependent teachers and students (doctoral dissertation, Cornell University, 1969). Dissertation Abstracts International. 31:1970;463A-464A.
4. Dor-Shave Z., Peleg R. Mobile field-independence and rating as a 'good teacher'. Educational Psychology. 9(2):1989;149-163.
5. Folman R.Z. Therapist-patient perceptual style, interpersonal attraction, initial interview behavior, and premature termination. (doctoral dissertation, Boston University, 1973). Dissertation Abstracts International. 34:1973;1746B.
6. Frank B.M., Davis J.K. Effect of field-independence match or mismatch on a communication task. Journal of Educational Psychology. 74:1982;23-31.
7. Greene M.A. Client perception of the relationship as a function of worker-client cognitive. Dissertation Abstracts International. 33:1972;3030A-3031A.
8. Hudak M.A. Review of Learning Styles Inventory. Keyser D.J., Sweetland R.C. Test critiques. II:1985;402-410 Test Corporation of America, Kansas City, MO.
9. Hunt D.E. A conceptual level matching model for coordinating learner characteristics with educational approaches. Interchange. 1(3):1970;68-82.
10. Hunt D.E. Theorists and persons, too: on preaching what you practice. Parker C.A. Encouraging development in college students. 1978;250-266 University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, MN.
11. Hunt J. How children develop intellectually. Children. 11:1964;83-91.
12. Hunt J. Using intrinsic motivation to teach young children. Educational Technology. 71:1971;78-80.
13. Jolly P.E., Strawitz B.M. Teacher-student cognitive style and achievement in biology. Science Education. 68(4):1984;485-490.
14. Kogan N. A style of life, a life of style (review of Cognitive styles in personal and cultural adaptation). Contemporary Psychology. 25:1980;595-598.
15. Mahlios M. Effects of cognitive style on patterns of dyadic classroom interaction. Journal of Experimental Education. 49:1981;147-157.
16. Mahlios M. The influence of cognitive style and the teaching practices of elementary teachers. Saracho O.N. Cognitive style in early education. 1990;129-147 Gordon & Breach, New York.
17. Messick S. The nature of cognitive styles: problems and promise in educational practice. Educational Psychologist. 19(2):1984;59-74.
18. Packer J., Bain J.D. Cognitive style and teacher-student compatibility. Journal of Educational Psychology. 70(5):1978;864-871.
19. Renninger K.A., Snyder S.S. Effects of cognitive style on perceived satisfaction and performance among students and teachers. Journal of Educational Psychology. 75:1983;668-676.
20. Riding R.J., Cheema I. Cognitive styles - an overview and integration. Educational Psychology. 11:1991;193-215.
21. Saracho, O. N. (1982). The cognitive style of teachers and their perceptions of their matched and mismatched children's academic competence. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. New York, New York.
22. Saracho O.N. Relationship between cognitive style and teachers' perceptions of young children's academic competence. The Journal of Experimental Education. 57(4):1983;184-189.
23. Saracho O.N. The Goodenough-Harris Drawing Test as a measure of field-dependence/independence. Perceptual and Motor Skills. 59:1984;887-892.
24. Saracho O.N. A modification in scoring the ABC Scale. Journal of Personality Assessment. 49:1985;154-155.
25. Saracho O.N. Validation of two cognitive measures to assess field-dependence/independence. Perceptual and Motor Skills. 63:1986;255-263.
26. Saracho O.N. The match and mismatch of students' and teachers' cognitive styles: a case study of two kindergarten classrooms. EarLy Child Development and Care. 29(2):1987;209-238.
27. Saracho O.N. Cognitive style and early childhood practice. Spodek B., Saracho O.N., Peters D.L. Professionalism and the early childhood practitioner. 1998;173-188 Teachers College Press, New York.
28. Saracho, O. N. (1988b). Matching students' and teachers' cognitive styles. Paper presented at the annual conference of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.
29. Saracho O.N. The match and mismatch of teachers' and students' cognitive styles. Early Child Development and Care. 54:1990;99-109.
30. Saracho O.N. Students' preferences for field dependence-independence teacher characteristics. Educational Psychology. 71(3/4):1991;323-332.
31. Saracho O.N. Teachers and students' cognitive styles in early childhood education. 1997;Greenwood Press, Westport, CT.
32. Saracho O.N., Spodek B. Teachers' cognitive styles and their educational implications. Educational Forum. 45:1981;153-159.
33. Saracho O.N., Spodek B. Cognitive style and children's learning: individual variation in cognitive processes. Katz L.G. Current topics in early childhood education. XI:1986;177-194 Ablex, Norwood, NJ.
34. Saracho O.N., Spodek B. Matching preschool children's and teachers' cognitive styles. Perceptual and Motor Skills. 78:1994;683-689.
35. Shipman S.L. Limitations of applying cognitive style to early childhood education. Saracho O.N. Cognitive style and early education. 1990;33-42 Gordon & Breach, New York.
36. Shipman S., Shipman V.C. Cognitive styles: some conceptual, methodological, and applied issues. Review of Research in Education. 12:1985;229-291.
37. Steele C. Cognitive style and the gifted young child. Saracho O.N. Cognitive style and early education. 1990;197-214 Gordon & Breach, New York.
38. Wachtel P.L. Style and capacity in analytic functioning. Journal of Personality. 36:1968;202-212.
39. Witkin H.A. Some implications of research on cognitive style for problems of education. Archivio Di Psicologia Neurologia E Psichiatria. 26:1965;27-54.
40. Witkin H.A. The role of cognitive style in academic performance and in teacher student relations. 1973;Educational Testing Service, Princeton, NJ.
41. Witkin H.A., Goodenough D.R. Field dependence revisited (ETS RB 77-16). 1977;Educational Testing Service, Princeton, NJ.
42. Witkin H.A., Goodenough D.R. Cognitive control: essence and origins of field dependence and field independence. Psychological issues, monograph 51. 1981;International Universities Press, New York.
43. Witkin H.A., Moore C.A. Cognitive style and the teaching learning process. 1974;Educational Testing Service, Princeton, NJ.
44. Witkin H.A., Dyk R.B., Faterson H.F., Goodenough D.R., Karp S.A. Psychological differentiation: studies of development. 1974;Wiley, New York.
45. Witkin H.A., Lewis H.B., Hertzman M., Machover K., Meissner P.B., Wapner S. Personality through perception: an experimental and clinical study. 1972;Greenwood Press, Westport, CT.
46. Witkin H.A., Moore C.A., Goodenough D.R., Cox P.W. Field-dependent and field-independent cognitive styles and their educational implications. Review of Educational Research. 47(7):1977;1-64.