Concealed pseudo-clefts

Lingua

Volumn 111, Issue 10, 2001, Pages 707-727

  Paul, Ileana ^a  

^a MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

Clefts; Focus; Malagasy; Pseudo clefts

Indexed keywords

EID: 0041365900     PISSN: 00243841     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0024-3841(00)00044-9     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Akmajian, A., 1970. On deriving cleft sentences from pseudo-cleft sentences. Linguistic Inquiry 1, 149-168.
2. Bauer, W. 1991. Maori ko again. Te Reo 34, 3-14.
3. Chomsky, N., 1977. On WH-movement. In: P. Culicover, T. Wasow, A. Akmajian (eds.), Formal syntax, 71-132. New York: Academic Press.
4. Chung, S., 1998. The design of agreement: Evidence from Chamorro. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
5. Cole, P., G. Hermon and N. Aman, to appear. Clefted questions in Malay. In: D. Gil, J. Collins (eds.), Malay/Indonesian linguistics. London: Curzon Press.
6. Davies, W., 2000. The syntax of the Madurese cleft. Manuscript, University of Iowa.
7. Georgopoulos, C., 1991. Syntactic variables: Resumptive pronouns and A' binding in Palauan. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
8. Guilfoyle, E., H. Hung and L. Travis, 1992. Spec of IP and Spec of VP: Two subjects in Austronesian languages. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 10, 375-414.
9. Halvorsen, P.-K., 1978. The syntax and semantics of cleft constructions. Ph.D. thesis, University of Texas.
10. Hardjadibrata, R.R., 1985. Sundanese: A syntactic analysis. Canberra: Australian National University.
11. Higgins, F.R., 1979. The pseudo-cleft construction in English. New York: Garland.
12. Jespersen, O. 1928. Analytic syntax. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
13. Kader, M., 1976. The syntax of Malay interrogatives. Ph.D. thesis, Simon Fraser University.
14. Keenan, E.L., 1972. Relative clause formation in Malagasy. In: The Chicago which hunt: Papers from the Relative Clause Festival, 169-189. Chicago: CLS.
15. É. Kiss, K., 1998. Identificational focus versus information focus. Language 74, 245-273.
16. Kroeger, P., 1993. Phrase structure and grammatical relations in Tagalog. Stanford, CA: CLSI.
17. Malzac, R.P., 1960. Grammaire Malgache. Paris: Société d'Éditions Géographiques, Maritimes et Coloniales.
18. Paul, I., 2000. Malagasy clause structure. Ph.D. thesis, McGill University.
19. Pearson, M., 1996. Domain phrases and topic arguments in Malagasy existentials. In: M. Pearson, I. Paul (eds.), UCLA Occasional Papers in Linguistics 17, 113-141. Los Angeles: UCLA.
20. Percus, O., 1996. Prying open the cleft. In: Proceedings of NELS 26. Amherst, MA: GLSA.
21. Pinkham, J. and J. Hankamer, 1975. Deep and shallow clefts. In: Proceedings of CLS 11, 429-450. Chicago: CLS.
22. Richards, N., 1998. Syntax versus semantics in Tagalog wh-extraction. In: M. Pearson (ed.), UCLA Occasional Papers in Linguistics 21, 259-275. Los Angeles: UCLA.
23. Rizzi, L., 1997. The fine structure of the left periphery. In: L. Haegeman (ed.), Elements of grammar, 281-337. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
24. Strawson, P.F., 1950. On referring. Mind 59, 320-344.
25. Szabolcsi, A., 1981. The semantics of topic-focus articulation. In: J. Groenendijk, T. Janssen, M. Stokhof (eds.), Formal methods in the study of language, 513-541. Amsterdam: Matematisch Centrum.