Defining rural areas – International comparisons and the OECD indicators1

Rural Society

Volumn 6, Issue 3, 1996, Pages 3-18

  Dax, Thomas ^a  

^a Fed Inst Less Favoured/MA   (Austria)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0041359156     PISSN: 10371656     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5172/rsj.6.3.3     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Appleton, Z. 1994. ‘European Union rural development policy, 1994 - 1999’. Paper to 35th EAAE-Seminar “Rural Realities. Trends and Choices’. Aberdeen.
2. Bollmann, R. 1992. Rural and small town Canada. Lewiston, New York: Thompson Educational Publishers.
3. Bonanno, A. & K. Bradley. 1994. ‘Spatial relations in the global socio-economic system and the implications for development planning’. In D. Symes & A. Jansen (eds) Agricultural restructuring and rural change in Europe. Wageningen: Agricultural University.
4. Commins, P. & M. Keane. 1994. Developing the rural economy. Dublin: NESC.
5. CEC (Commission of the European Communities). 1988. The future of rural society. COMM (88) 601 Final/2, Brussels: The Commission.
6. CEC (Commission of the European Communities). 1989. Guide to the reform of the Community’s Structural Funds. BrusselsLuxembourg: The Commission.
7. CEC (Commission of the European Communities). 1993. Farm household adjustment in Western Europe 1987-1991, Final Report on the research programme on farm structures and pluriactivity. Brussels-Luxembourg: The Commission.
8. Dax, T. 1993. Der ländliche Raum -Bedeutung im internationalen Vergleich. Facts & Features Nr. 5, Bundesanstalt für Bergbauemfragen.Vienna.
9. Dax, T., E. Loibl & T. Oedl-Wieser (eds) 1995. Pluriactivity and rural development. Research Report No. 34, Bundesanstalt für Bergbauemfragen, Vienna.
10. Deavers, K. 1988. ‘Rural economic conditions and development policy for the 1980s and 1990s’. In G. Summers et al (eds). Agriculture and beyond - rural economic development. University of Wisconsin-Madison.
11. Fuguitt, G. 1991. ‘Community and the ruralurban hierarchy’. Journal of Rural Studies 7 (4): 459-466.
12. Gade, O, L. Persson & U. Wiberg. 1992. ‘Processes shaping the rural-urban continuum. The cases of Sweden and North Carolina, USA’. In M. Ö’Cinnöide & S. Grimes (eds). Planning and development of marginal areas. Galway: Centre for Development Studies, University College Galway.
13. Grillo-Pasquarelli, E. 1992. Rural Development from the perspective of the Commission of the European Communities’. In M. Ö’Cinnäide & H. Cuddy (eds). Perspectives on rural development in advanced economies. Galway: Centre for Development Studies, University College Galway.
14. Halfacree, K. 1993. ‘Locality and social representation. space, discourse and alternative definitions of the rural’. Journal of Rural Studies 9(1): 23-37.
15. Halfacree, K. 1995. Talking about rurality. social representations of the rural as expressed by research in six English parishes.’ Journal of Rural Studies 11(1):1-20.
16. Hoggart, K 1990. ‘Let’s do away with rural’. Journal of Rural Studies 6(3): 245-257.
17. King, R. 1992. ‘Heterogenity of rural areas. Posing the strategic issues.’ In M. Ô’Cinnéide & H. Cuddy (eds). Perspectives on rural development in advanced economies. Galway: Centre for Development Studies, University College Galway.
18. Malinen, P., R. Kerânen & H. Kerànen. 1994. Rural area typology in Finland - A tool for rural policy. Research Report No. 123. Research Institute of Northern Finland, Oulu.
19. Marsden, T. 1995. ‘Beyond agriculture? Regulating the new rural spaces’. Journal of Rural Studies 11(3): 285-296.
20. Newby, H. 1986. ‘Locality and rurality. The restructuring of rural social relations’. Regional Studies 20: 209-215.
21. OECD (Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development). 1993. What future for our countryside? A rural development policy. Paris: OECD.
22. OECD (Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development). 1994a. Creating Rural Indicators for shaping territorial policy. Paris: OECD.
23. OECD (Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development). 1994b. The contribution of amenities to rural development. Paris: OECD.
24. OECD (Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development). 1995. Adjustment in OECD Agriculture. Issues and policy responses, Paris: OECD.
25. OECD (Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development). 1996a. Better policies for rural development, Paris: OECD.
26. OECD (Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development). 1996b. Rural employment indicators (REMI), Structures and dynamics of regional labour markets, Paris: OECD.
27. Oksa, J. & P. Rannikko. 1996. ‘The changing meanings of rurality challenge policies’, (editorial). Finnish Journal of Rural Research and Policy, University of Joensuu.
28. Pratt, A. 1996. Tiscourses of rurality. Loose talk or social struggle?’ Journal of Rural Studies 12(1): 69-78.
29. Saraceno, E. 1994. ‘Recent trends in rural development and their conceptualization’. Paper to 35th EAAE-Seminar ‘Rural Realities. Trends and Choices’. Aberdeen.
30. Schindegger, F. 1992. ‘Rural problems and rural policy in Austria’. Paper prepared for the 4th Meeting of the OECD Group of the Council on Rural Development. Vienna, 13-15 October.
31. USDA (United States Department of Agriculture). 1995. Understanding rural America. Agriculture Information Bulletin No. 710, Washington DC: USDA
32. Wilkinson, K. 1992. ‘Social stabilisation. The role of rural society’. In M. Ô’Cinnéide & H. Cuddy (eds). Perspectives on rural development in advanced economies. Galway: Centre for Development Studies, University College Galway.