Transforming Psychological Practice and Society: Policies that Reflect the New Paradigm

American Psychologist

Volumn 58, Issue 4, 2003, Pages 305-312

  Gill, Carol J ^a   Kewman, Donald G ^c   Brannon, Ruth W ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO   (United States)

^b Department of Health and Human Services   (United States)

^c M/C 626 ^*

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLINICAL PRACTICE; EDUCATION; HUMAN; LEGAL ASPECT; PSYCHOLOGY; UNITED STATES;

HUMANS; PHYSICIAN'S PRACTICE PATTERNS; PSYCHOLOGY; UNITED STATES;

EID: 0041349367     PISSN: 0003066X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0003-066X.58.4.305     Document Type: Review

References (48)

1. American Psychological Association. (1998). Hate crimes today: An age-old foe in modern dress. Washington, DC: Author.
2. American Psychological Association. (2002). Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct. American Psychologist, 57, 1060-1073.
3. Americans With Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq. (1990).
4. Asch, A. (1984). The experience of disability: a challenge for psychology. American Psychologist, 39, 529-536.
5. Asch, A. (1998). Distracted by disability. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics, 7, 77-87.
6. Boyce, W. (1998). Participation of disability advocates in research partnerships with health professionals. Canadian Journal of Rehabilitation, 12, 85-93.
7. Crewe, N. M. (1994). Implications of the Americans with Disabilities Act for the training of psychologists. Rehabilitation Education, 8, 9-16.
8. Daw, J. (2002, January). Some psychology postdoc programs now qualify for federal financial support. Monitor on Psychology, 33(1), 19.
9. DeJong, G. (1997). Primary care for persons with disabilities; An overview of the problem. American Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 76(Suppl.), S2-S8.
10. DePoy, E. (2002). Will the real definition of disability please stand up. Psychosocial Process, 15, 50-53.
11. Elliott, T. R., & Gramling, S. E. (1990). Psychologists and rehabilitation: New roles and old training models. American Psychologist, 45, 762-765.
12. Foote, W. E. (2000). A model for psychological consultation in cases involving the Americans With Disabilities Act. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 31, 190-196.
13. Gill, C. J., Kirschner, K., & Panko Reis, J. (1994). Health services for women with disabilities: Barriers and portals. In A. J. Dan (Ed.), Reframing women's health: Multidisciplinary research and practice (pp. 357-366). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
14. Goodman-Delahunty, J. (2000). Psychological impairment under the Americans With Disabilities Act: Legal guidelines. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 31, 197-205.
15. Hadley, R. L. (1998). The Americans With Disabilities Act of 1990: Faculty and student perceptions of reasonable accommodations versus competency in graduate psychology programs. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B. The Sciences & Engineering, 58(11-B), 6235.
16. Hagglund, K. J., Kewman, D. G., & Ashkanazi, G. S. (2000). Medicare and prospective payment systems. In R. G. Frank & T. R. Elliott (Eds.), Handbook of rehabilitation psychology (pp. 603-614). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
17. Hahn, H. (1985). Toward a politics of disability: Definitions, disciplines, and policies. Social Science Journal, 22, 87-105.
18. Hahn, H. (1996). Antidiscrimination laws and social research on disability: The minority group perspective. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 14, 41-59.
19. Hauser, P. C., Maxwell-McCaw, D. L., Leigh, I. W., & Gutman, V. A. (2000). Internship accessibility issues for deaf and hard-of-hearing applications: No cause for complacency. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 31, 569-574.
20. Highlander statement of concern and call to action. (2000). Retrieved March 25, 2003, from http://www.narpa.org/highlander.htm
21. Individuals With Disabilities Education Act Amendments of 1997, 20 U.S.C. ch. 33 (1997).
22. Iscoe, I. (1974). Community psychology and the competent community. American Psychologist, 29, 607-613.
23. Jenkins, J. O., & Ramsey, G. A. (1991). Minorities. In M. Hersen, A. E. Kazdin, & A. S. Bellack (Eds.), Clinical psychology handbook (2nd ed., pp. 724-740). Elmsford, NY: Pergamon Press.
24. Kasnitz, D., Bonney, S., Aftandelian, R. & Bromfield, I. (2000). A survey of disability studies programs at colleges and universities. Oakland, CA: Rehabilitation Research and Training Center on Independent Living and Disability Policy, World Institute on Disability.
25. Kiesler, C. A. (2000). The next wave of change for psychology and mental health services in the health care revolution. American Psychologist, 55, 481-487.
26. Kosciulek, J. F. (1999). The consumer-directed theory of empowerment. Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin, 42, 196-213.
27. Krogh, K. (1998). A conceptual framework of community partnerships: Perspectives of people with disabilities on power, beliefs and values. Canadian Journal of Rehabilitation, 12, 123-134.
28. LaPlante, M. P., & Carlson, D. (1996). Disability in the United States: Prevalence and causes, 1992 (Disability Statistics Rep. No. 7). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research.
29. Linton, S. (1998). Claiming disability: Knowledge and identity. New York: New York University Press.
30. Longmore, P. K. (1985). A note on language and the social identity of disabled people. American Behavioral Scientist, 28, 419-423.
31. Longmore, P. K. (1995). Medical decision making and people with disabilities: A clash of cultures. Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics, 23, 82-87.
32. Merriam-Webster's collegiate dictionary. (1998). Springfield, MA: Merriam-Webster.
33. Murray, B. (2002, March). Psychology training gets major recognition. Monitor on Psychology, 33(3), 22-23.
34. Nagi, S. Z. (1991). Disability concepts revisited: Implications for prevention. In A. M. Pope & A. R. Tarlov (Eds.), Disability in America: Toward a national agenda for prevention (pp. 309-327). Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
35. Oliver, M. (1996). Understanding disability: From theory to practice. New York: St. Martin's Press.
36. Olkin, R. (1999). What psychotherapists should know about disability. New York: Guilford Press.
37. Olkin, R., & Pledger, C. (2003). Can disability studies and psychology join hands? American Psychologist, 58, 296-304.
38. Pollard, R. Q., Jr. (1996). Professional psychology and deaf people: The emergence of a discipline. American Psychologist, 51, 389-396.
39. Reschly, D. J. (1999). Assessing educational disabilities. In A. K. Hess & I. B. Weiner (Eds.), Handbook of forensic psychology (2nd ed., pp. 127-150). New York: Wiley.
40. Sleek, S. (1999, January). Three decades after King, a report card. American Psychological Association Monitor, 30(1), 24-25.
41. Solarz, A. L. (1990). Rehabilitation psychologists: A place in the policy process? American Psychologist, 45, 766-770.
42. Task Force on Psychology and the Handicapped. (1984). Final report of the Task Force on Psychology and the Handicapped. American Psychologist, 39, 545-550.
43. Tate, D. G, & Forchheimer, M. (1998), Enhancing community reintegration following inpatient rehabilitation for persons with spinal cord injury. Topics in SCI Rehab: Part I, 4, 42-55.
44. Telzrow, C. F. (1999). IDEA amendments of 1997: Promise or pitfall for special education reform? Journal of School Psychology, 37, 7-28.
45. Ticket to Work and Work Incentives Improvement Act, Pub. L. No. 106-170, 113 Stat. 1860 (1999).
46. Trickett, E. J., Watts, R. J., & Birman, D. (Eds.). (1994). Human diversity: Perspectives on people in context. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
47. Vasquez, M. J. T., & Eldridge, N. S. (1994). Bringing ethics alive: Training practitioners about gender, ethnicity, and sexual orientation issues. Women and Therapy, 15, 1-16.
48. Wright, B. A. (1960). Physical disability: A psychological approach. New York: Harper & Row.