Abstract and associatively based representations in human sequence learning

Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences

Volumn 358, Issue 1435, 2003, Pages 1277-1283

  Spiegel, Rainer ^a,b,c   McLaren, I P L ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

^c University of Cambridge   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Abstraction; Analogy making; Associative learning; Neural networks; Rule induction; Symbol manipulation

Indexed keywords

ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORK; LEARNING; PERCEPTION;

EID: 0041346059     PISSN: 09628436     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2003.1311     Document Type: Review

References (32)

1. Anderson, J. R. 1993 Rules of the mind. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
2. Cleeremans, A. 1993 Mechanisms of implicit learning. Connectionist models of sequence processing. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
3. Cleeremans, A. 1994a The representation of structure in sequence prediction tasks. In Attention and performance XV. Conscious and nonconscious information processing (ed. C. Umiltà & M. Moscovitch), pp. 783-809. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
4. Cleeremans, A. 1994b Awareness and abstraction are graded dimensions. Commentary to Shanks & St John: characteristics of dissociable human learning systems. Behav. Brain Sci. 17, 402-403.
5. Cleeremans, A. 1997 Principles for implicit learning. In How implicit is implicit learning? (ed. D. C. Berry), pp. 195-234. Oxford University Press.
6. Elman, J. L. 1990 Finding structure in time. Cogn. Sci. 14, 179-211.
7. Hofstadter, D. 1995 Fluid concepts and creative analogies. New York: Basic Books.
8. Lebiere, C. & Wallach, D. 2000 Sequence learning in the ACT-R cognitive architecture: empirical analysis of a hybrid model. In Sequence learning (ed. R. Sun & C. L. Giles), pp. 188-212. Berlin: Springer.
9. Lewicki, P., Czyzewska, M. & Hoffman, H. 1987 Unconscious acquisition of complex procedural knowledge. J. Exp. Psychol. Learning, Memory Cogn. 13, 523-530.
10. McLaren, I. P. L., Green, R. E. A. & Mackintosh, N. J. 1994 Animal learning and the implicit/explicit distinction. In Implicit and explicit learning of languages (ed. N. C. Ellis), pp. 313-332. London: Academic.
11. Marcus, G. F. 2001 The algebraic mind. Integrating connectionism and cognitive science. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
12. Marcus, G. F., Vijayan, S., Bandi Rao, S. & Vishton, P. M. 1999 Rule learning by seven-month-old infants. Science 283, 77-80.
13. Marshall, J. B. 1999 Metacat: a self-watching cognitive architecture for analogy-making and high-level perception. PhD thesis, Department of Computer Science and Cognitive Science Program, Indiana University, USA.
14. Minsky, M. 1986 The society of mind. London: Heinemann.
15. Mitchell, M. 1993 Analogy-making as perception: a computer model. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
16. Mitchell, T. M. 1997 Machine learning. New York: McGraw-Hill.
17. Nissen, M. J. & Bullemer, P. 1987 Attentional requirements of learning: evidence from performance measures. Cogn. Psychol. 19, 1-32.
18. Norman, D. A. 1993 Approaches to the study of intelligence. In The SOAR papers. Research on integrated intelligence, vol. 2 (ed. P. S. Rosenbloom, J. E. Laird & A. Newell), pp. 793-812. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
19. Pinker, S. 1999 Enhanced: out of the minds of babes. Science 283, 40-41.
20. Rehling, J. A. 2001 Letter spirit (part two): modeling creativity in a visual domain. PhD thesis, Department of Computer Science and Cognitive Science Program, Indiana University.
21. Rosenbloom, P. S., Laird, J. E. & Newell, A. 1993a The SOAR papers. Research on integrated intelligence, vol. 1. Cambridge, MA, MIT Press.
22. Rosenbloom, P. S., Laird, J. E. & Newell, A. 1993b The SOAR papers. Research on integrated intelligence, vol. 2. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
23. Rumelhart, D. E., Hinton, G. E. & Williams, R. J. 1986a Learning representations by back-propagating errors. Nature 323, 533-536.
24. Rumelhart, D. E., Hinton, G. E. & Williams, R. J. 1986b Learning internal representations by error propagation. In Parallel distributed processing, vol. 1 (ed. D. E. Rumelhart & J. L. McClelland), pp. 318-362. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
25. Russell, J. 2004 The necessity of associative models, and more of their over-reaching. In What is language development? Rationalist, empiricist and pragmatist theories of syntax acquisition. Oxford University Press. (In the press.)
26. Spiegel, R. 2002 Human and machine learning of spatio-temporal sequences: an experimental and computational investigation. PhD thesis, University of Cambridge, UK.
27. Spiegel, R. & McLaren, I. P. L. 2001a Human sequence learning: can associations explain everything? In Proc. 23rd Ann. Conf. Cognitive Science Society (ed. J. D. Moore & K. Stenning), pp. 976-981. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
28. Spiegel, R. & McLaren, I. P. L. 2001b SARAH: modeling the results of Spiegel & McLaren 2001a. In Proc. 23rd Ann. Conf. Cognitive Science Society (ed. J. D. Moore & K. Stenning), p. 1230. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
29. Spiegel, R. & McLaren, I. P. L. 2001c Recurrent neural networks and symbol grounding. In Proc. Int. Joint INNS/IEEE Conf. on Neural Networks, vol. 1 pp. 320-325. Piscataway, NJ: IEEE.
30. Spiegel, R., Le Pelley, M. E., Suret, M. & McLaren, I. P. L. 2002a Combining fuzzy rules and a neural network in an adaptive system. In Proc. IEEE World Congress on Computational Intelligence. IEEE Int. Conf. on Fuzzy Systems. pp. 340-356. Piscataway, NJ: IEEE.
31. Spiegel, R., Suret, M., Le Pelley, M. E. & McLaren, I. P. L. 2002b Analyzing state dynamics in a recurrent neural network. In Proc. IEEE World Congress on Computational Intelligence. Int. Joint INNS/IEEE Conf. on Neural Networks. pp. 834-839. Piscataway, NJ: IEEE.
32. Werbos, P. 1974 Beyond regression: new tools for prediction and analysis in behavior sciences. PhD thesis, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA.