The effect of eye closure on the post-lens tear film thickness during silicone hydrogel contact lens wear

Cornea

Volumn 22, Issue 6, 2003, Pages 539-544

  Nichols, Jason J ^a   King Smith, P Ewen ^b  

^a OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

Contact lens; Eye closure; Post lens tear film; Silicone hydrogel

Indexed keywords

SILICONE;

ADULT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTACT LENS; EYELID CLOSURE; FEMALE; HUMAN; HYDROGEL; MALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TEAR FILM; THICKNESS;

ADULT; CONTACT LENSES; EYELIDS; FEMALE; HUMANS; HYDROGEL; INTERFEROMETRY; MALE; SILICONES; TEARS; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 0041342961     PISSN: 02773740     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00003226-200308000-00010     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Nichols JJ, King-Smith PE. Thickness of the pre- and post-contact lens tear film measured in vivo by interferometry. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2003;44:68-77.
2. Fonn D, Situ P, Simpson T. Hydrogel lens dehydration and subjective comfort and dryness ratings in symptomatic and asymptomatic contact lens wearers. Optom Vis Sci. 1999;76:700-704.
3. Willcox MD, Morris CA, Thakur A, et al. Complement and complement regulatory proteins in human tears. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1997;38:1-8.
4. Willcox MD, Power KN, Stapleton F, et al. Potential sources of bacteria that are isolated from contact lenses during wear. Optom Vis Sci. 1997;74:1030-1038.
5. Chang SW, Chang CJ. Delayed tear clearance in contact lens associated papillary conjunctivitis. Curr Eye Res. 2001;22:253-257.
6. Dejaco-Ruhswurm I, Scholz U, Hanselmayer G, et al. Contact lens induced keratitis associated with contact lens wear. Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 2001;79:479-483.
7. Rattanatam T, Heng WJ, Rapuano CJ, et al. Trends in contact lens-related corneal ulcers. Cornea. 2001;20:290-294.
8. Creech JL, Chauhan A, Radke CJ. Dispersive mixing in the posterior tear film under a soft contact lens. Ind Eng Chem Res. 2001;40:3015-3026.
9. Chauhan A, Radke CJ. Settling and deformation of a thin elastic shell on a thin fluid layer lying on a solid surface. J Colloid Interface Sci. 2002;245:187-197.
10. Little SA, Bruce AS. Postlens tear film morphology, lens movement and symptoms in hydrogel lens wearers. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 1994;14:65-69.
11. Bruce AS, Brennan NA. Clinical observations of the post-lens tear film during the first hour of hydrogel lens wear. ICLC. 1988;15:304-310.
12. Little SA, Bruce AS. Osmotic determinants of postlens tear film morphology and hydrogel lens movement. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 1995;15:117-124.
13. Bruce AS, Brennan NA. Hydrogel lens binding and the post-lens tear film. Clin Eye Vision Care. 1992;4:111-116.
14. Little SA, Bruce AS. Hydrogel (Acuvue) lens movement is influenced by the postlens tear film. Optom Vis Sci. 1994;71:364-370.
15. Little SA, Bruce AS. Role of the post-lens tear film in the mechanism of inferior arcuate staining with ultrathin hydrogel lenses. CLAO. 1995;21:175-181.
16. Little SA, Bruce AS. Environmental influences on hydrogel lens dehydration and the postlens tear film. ICLC. 1995;22:148-155.
17. Bruce AS, Mainstone JC. Lens adherence and postlens tear film changes in closed-eye wear of hydrogel lenses. Optom Vis Sci. 1996;73:28-34.
18. King-Smith PE, Fink BA, Fogt N, et al. The thickness of the human precorneal tear film: evidence from reflection spectra. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2000;41:3348-3359.
19. Lin MC, Graham AD, Polse KA, et al. Measurement of post-lens tear thickness. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1999;40:2833-2839.
20. Craig JP, Simmons PA, Patel S, et al. Refractive index and osmolality of human tears. Optom Vis Sci. 1995;72:718-724.
21. Jalbert I, Sweeney DF, Holden BA. The characteristics of corneal staining in successful daily and extended disposable contact lens wearers. Clin Exp Optom. 1999;82:4-10.
22. Zadnik K, Mutti DO. Inferior arcuate corneal staining in soft contact lens wearers. ICLC. 1985;12:110-115.
23. Ren DH, Petroll WM, Jester JV, et al. The relationship between contact lens oxygen permeability and binding of Pseudomonas aeruginosa to human corneal epithelial cells after overnight and extended wear. CLAO. 1999;25:80-100.
24. Ladage PM, Yamamoto K, Ren DH, et al. Effects of rigid and soft contact lens daily wear on corneal epithelium, tear lactate dehydrogenase, and bacterial binding to exfoliated epithelial cells. Ophthalmology. 2001;108:1279-1288.
25. Ren DH, Yamamoto K, Ladage PM, et al. Adaptive effects of 30-night wear of hyper-O(2) transmissible contact lenses on bacterial binding and corneal epithelium: a 1-year clinical trial. Ophthalmology. 2002;109:27-39.
26. Goldberg EP, Bhatia S, Enns JB. Hydrogel contact lens-corneal interactions: a new mechanism for deposit formation and corneal injury. CLAO. 1997;23:243-248.
27. Josephson JE, Caffery BE. Proposed hypothesis for comeal infiltrates, microabrasions, and red eye associated with extended wear. Optom Vis Sci. 1989;66:192.
28. Tan KO, Sack RA, Holden BA, et al. Temporal sequence of changes in tear film composition during sleep. Curr Eye Res. 1993;12:1001-1007.
29. Harris MG, Mandell RB. Contact lens adaptation: osmotic theory. Am J Optom Arch Am Acad Optom. 1969;46:196-202.
30. Polse KA, Mandell RB. Contact lens adaptation. J Am Optom Assoc. 1971;42:45-50.
31. Paugh JR, Stapleton F, Keay L, et al. Tear exchange under hydrogel contact lenses: methodological considerations. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2001;42:2813-2820.