The lure of regional security arrangements: The United States and regional security cooperation in Asia and Europe

Agricultural History Review

Volumn 10, Issue 2, 2000, Pages 49-97

  Press‐Barnathan, Galia ^a  

^a HEBREW UNIVERSITY OF JERUSALEM   (Israel)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0041335365     PISSN: 00021490     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09636410008429430     Document Type: Article

References (9)

1. For an example of competing visions regarding the U.S. future grand strategy, see Stephen M. Walt, "The Case for Finite Containment - Analyzing U.S. Grand Strategy," International Security 14, no.1 (summer 1989): 5-49. See also Christopher Layne, "From Preponderance to Offshore Balancing: America's Future Grand Strategy," International Security 22, no.1 (summer 1997): 86-124. Eugene Gholz, Daryl G. Press, and Harvey M. Sapolsky, "Come Home, America: The Strategy of Restraint in the Face of Temptation"; Michael Mastanduno, "Preserving the Unipolar Moment: Realist Theories and U.S. Grand Strategy after the Cold War"; and John Gerard Ruggie, "The Past as Prologue? Interests, Identity, and American Foreign Policy," all in International Security 21, no.4 (spring 1997): 89-125.
2. For an example of competing visions regarding the U.S. future grand strategy, see Stephen M. Walt, "The Case for Finite Containment - Analyzing U.S. Grand Strategy," International Security 14, no.1 (summer 1989): 5-49. See also Christopher Layne, "From Preponderance to Offshore Balancing: America's Future Grand Strategy," International Security 22, no.1 (summer 1997): 86-124. Eugene Gholz, Daryl G. Press, and Harvey M. Sapolsky, "Come Home, America: The Strategy of Restraint in the Face of Temptation"; Michael Mastanduno, "Preserving the Unipolar Moment: Realist Theories and U.S. Grand Strategy after the Cold War"; and John Gerard Ruggie, "The Past as Prologue? Interests, Identity, and American Foreign Policy," all in International Security 21, no.4 (spring 1997): 89-125.
3. For an example of competing visions regarding the U.S. future grand strategy, see Stephen M. Walt, "The Case for Finite Containment - Analyzing U.S. Grand Strategy," International Security 14, no.1 (summer 1989): 5-49. See also Christopher Layne, "From Preponderance to Offshore Balancing: America's Future Grand Strategy," International Security 22, no.1 (summer 1997): 86-124. Eugene Gholz, Daryl G. Press, and Harvey M. Sapolsky, "Come Home, America: The Strategy of Restraint in the Face of Temptation"; Michael Mastanduno, "Preserving the Unipolar Moment: Realist Theories and U.S. Grand Strategy after the Cold War"; and John Gerard Ruggie, "The Past as Prologue? Interests, Identity, and American Foreign Policy," all in International Security 21, no.4 (spring 1997): 89-125.
4. For an example of competing visions regarding the U.S. future grand strategy, see Stephen M. Walt, "The Case for Finite Containment - Analyzing U.S. Grand Strategy," International Security 14, no.1 (summer 1989): 5-49. See also Christopher Layne, "From Preponderance to Offshore Balancing: America's Future Grand Strategy," International Security 22, no.1 (summer 1997): 86-124. Eugene Gholz, Daryl G. Press, and Harvey M. Sapolsky, "Come Home, America: The Strategy of Restraint in the Face of Temptation"; Michael Mastanduno, "Preserving the Unipolar Moment: Realist Theories and U.S. Grand Strategy after the Cold War"; and John Gerard Ruggie, "The Past as Prologue? Interests, Identity, and American Foreign Policy," all in International Security 21, no.4 (spring 1997): 89-125.
5. For an example of competing visions regarding the U.S. future grand strategy, see Stephen M. Walt, "The Case for Finite Containment - Analyzing U.S. Grand Strategy," International Security 14, no.1 (summer 1989): 5-49. See also Christopher Layne, "From Preponderance to Offshore Balancing: America's Future Grand Strategy," International Security 22, no.1 (summer 1997): 86-124. Eugene Gholz, Daryl G. Press, and Harvey M. Sapolsky, "Come Home, America: The Strategy of Restraint in the Face of Temptation"; Michael Mastanduno, "Preserving the Unipolar Moment: Realist Theories and U.S. Grand Strategy after the Cold War"; and John Gerard Ruggie, "The Past as Prologue? Interests, Identity, and American Foreign Policy," all in International Security 21, no.4 (spring 1997): 89-125.
6. On the importance of devising a clear strategy toward Asia, see Richard K. Betts, "Wealth, Power, and Instability: East Asia and the United States after the Cold War," International Security 18, no.3 (winter 1993/94): 34-77. For interesting analyses of the future role the United States should play in Asia, see Larry M. Wortzel, The ASEAN Regional Forum: Asian Security Without an American Umbrella (Carlisle Barracks: Strategic Studies Institute, U.S. Army War College, 13 December 1996); Stephen J. Blank, Helsinki in Asia? (Carlisle Barracks: Strategic Studies Institute, U.S. Army War College, 16 August 1993); Thomas L. Wilborn,
7. On the importance of devising a clear strategy toward Asia, see Richard K. Betts, "Wealth, Power, and Instability: East Asia and the United States after the Cold War," International Security 18, no.3 (winter 1993/94): 34-77. For interesting analyses of the future role the United States should play in Asia, see Larry M. Wortzel, The ASEAN Regional Forum: Asian Security Without an American Umbrella (Carlisle Barracks: Strategic Studies Institute, U.S. Army War College, 13 December 1996); Stephen J. Blank, Helsinki in Asia? (Carlisle Barracks: Strategic Studies Institute, U.S. Army War College, 16 August 1993); Thomas L. Wilborn,
8. On the importance of devising a clear strategy toward Asia, see Richard K. Betts, "Wealth, Power, and Instability: East Asia and the United States after the Cold War," International Security 18, no.3 (winter 1993/94): 34-77. For interesting analyses of the future role the United States should play in Asia, see Larry M. Wortzel, The ASEAN Regional Forum: Asian Security Without an American Umbrella (Carlisle Barracks: Strategic Studies Institute, U.S. Army War College, 13 December 1996); Stephen J. Blank, Helsinki in Asia? (Carlisle Barracks: Strategic Studies Institute, U.S. Army War College, 16 August 1993); Thomas L. Wilborn,
9. On the importance of devising a clear strategy toward Asia, see Richard K. Betts, "Wealth, Power, and Instability: East Asia and the United States after the Cold War," International Security 18, no.3 (winter 1993/94): 34-77. For interesting analyses of the future role the United States should play in Asia, see Larry M. Wortzel, The ASEAN Regional Forum: Asian Security Without an American Umbrella (Carlisle Barracks: Strategic Studies Institute, U.S. Army War College, 13 December 1996); Stephen J. Blank, Helsinki in Asia? (Carlisle Barracks: Strategic Studies Institute, U.S. Army War College, 16 August 1993); Thomas L. Wilborn,