State constitutional restrictions on legislative procedure: Rethinking the analysis of original purpose, single subject, and clear title challenges

Harvard Journal on Legislation

Volumn 38, Issue 1, 2001, Pages

  Dragich, Martha J ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0041335296     PISSN: 0017808X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (8)

1. See, e.g., Robert F. Williams, State Constitutional Limits on Legislative Procedure: Legislative Compliance and Judicial Enforcement, 48 U. PITT. L. REV. 797, 798 (1987).
2. See People v. Cervantes, 723 N.E.2d 265, 266 (Ill. 1999); Michael W. Catalano, The Single Subject Rule: A Check on Anti-Majoritarian Logrolling, 3 EMERGING ISSUES IN STATE CONST. LAW 77, 77; see also Williams, supra note 1, at 799 (contrasting substantive and procedural limitations).
3. See People v. Cervantes, 723 N.E.2d 265, 266 (Ill. 1999); Michael W. Catalano, The Single Subject Rule: A Check on Anti-Majoritarian Logrolling, 3 EMERGING ISSUES IN STATE CONST. LAW 77, 77; see also Williams, supra note 1, at 799 (contrasting substantive and procedural limitations).
4. See People v. Cervantes, 723 N.E.2d 265, 266 (Ill. 1999); Michael W. Catalano, The Single Subject Rule: A Check on Anti-Majoritarian Logrolling, 3 EMERGING ISSUES IN STATE CONST. LAW 77, 77; see also Williams, supra note 1, at 799 (contrasting substantive and procedural limitations).
5. See Williams, supra note 1, at 798-99. Other procedural limitations exist, but less frequently serve as the basis for challenging legislation. See, e.g., MO. CONST, art. III, § 20 (requiring a quorum and public sessions); id. § 25 (establishing time limits for introduction of bills); id. § 28 (requiring bills reviving, reenacting, or amending prior laws to be set forth in full).
6. See Williams, supra note 1, at 798-99. Other procedural limitations exist, but less frequently serve as the basis for challenging legislation. See, e.g., MO. CONST, art. III, § 20 (requiring a quorum and public sessions); id. § 25 (establishing time limits for introduction of bills); id. § 28 (requiring bills reviving, reenacting, or amending prior laws to be set forth in full).
7. E.g., MO. CONST, art. III, § 21.
8. See, e.g., id. § 23.