Medical image perception issues for PACS deployment

Seminars in Roentgenology

Volumn 38, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 231-243

  Krupinski, Elizabeth A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE PROCESSING; IMAGING AND DISPLAY; INFORMATION PROCESSING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW;

EID: 0041333865     PISSN: 0037198X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0037-198X(03)00047-6     Document Type: Article

References (81)

1. Forrester J, Dick A, McMenamin P, Lee W: The Eye basic Sciences in Practice. Philadelphia, PA, WB Saunders, 1996
2. Birkelo CC, Chamberlain WE, Phelps PS, et al: Tuberculosis case finding: Comparison of effectiveness of various roentgenographic and photofluorographic methods. JAMA 133: 359-366, 1947
3. Garland LH: On the scientific evaluation of diagnostic procedures. Radiology 52:309-328, 1949
4. Garland LH: On reliability of roentgen survey procedures. Am J Roentgenol 64:32-41, 1950
5. Cochrane AL, Garland LH: Observer error in interpretation of chest films: International investigation. Lancet 2:505-509, 1952
6. Siegle RL, Baram EM, Reuter SR, et al: Rates of disagreement in imaging interpretation in a group of community hospitals. Acad Radiol 5:148-154, 1998
7. Robinson PJA: Radiology's Achilles' heel: Error and variation in the interpretation of the roentgen image. Br J Radiol 70:1085-1098, 1997
8. Kundel HL, Nodine CF: Interpreting chest radiographs without visual search. Radiol 116:527-532, 1975
9. Kundel HL: Peripheral vision, structured noise and film reader error. Radiol 114:269-273, 1975
10. Kundel HL, Nodine CF, Toto L: Searching for lung nodules: The guidance of visual scanning. Invest Radiol 26: 777-781, 1991
11. Tuddenham WJ, Calvert WP: Visual search patterns in roentgen diagnosis. Radiology 76:255-256, 1961
12. Llewellyn Thomas E, Lansdown EL: Visual search patterns of radiologists in training. Radiology 81:288-291, 1963
13. Muhm JR, Miller WE, Fontana RS, et al: Lung cancer detection during a screening program using four-month chest radiographs. Radiology 148:609-615, 1983
14. Bird RE, Wallace TW, Yankaskas BC: Analysis of cancers missed at screening mammography. Radiology 184: 613-617, 1992
15. Kundel HL, Nodine CF, Krupinski EA: Searching for lung nodules: Visual dwell indicates locations of false-positive and false-negative decisions. Invest Radiol 24:472-478, 1989
16. Kundel HL, Nodine CF, Carmody DP: Visual scanning, pattern recognition and decision-making in pulmonary tumor detection. Invest Radiol 13:175-181, 1978
17. Nodine CF, Kundel HL, Toto LC, et al: Recording and analyzing eye-position data using a microcomputer workstation. Behav Res Meth Instrum Comp 24:475-485, 1992
18. Hu CH, Kundel HL, Nodine CF, et al: searching for bone fractures: A comparison with pulmonary nodule search. Acad Radiol 1:25-32. 1994
19. Krupinski EA, Lund PJ: Differences in time to interpretation for evaluation of bone radiographs with monitor and film viewing. Acad Radiol 4:177-182, 1997
20. Krupinski EA: Visual scanning patterns of radiologists searching mammograms. Acad Radiol 3:137-144, 1996
21. Nodine CF, Mello-Thoms C, Kundel HL, et al: Time course of perception and decision making during mammographic interpretation. Am J Roentgenol 179:917-923, 2002
22. Kimme-Smith C, Haus AG, DeBruhl N, et al: Effects of ambient light and view box luminance on the detection of calcifications in mammography. Am J Roentgenol 168:775-778, 1997
23. Wayant RW, Chakrabarti K, Kaczmerak R, et al: Improved sensitivity and specificity of mammograms by producing uniform luminance from viewboxes. J Digital Imag 11:189-191, 1998
24. Wang J, Gray JE: Detection of small low-contrast objects in mammography: Effect of viewbox masking and luminance. Am J Roentgenol 170:105-108, 1998
25. Robson KJ, Kotre CJ, Faulkner K: An experimental investigation of effect of light-box luminance on the detection of low contrast objects in mammography. Br J Radiol 69:153-159, 1996
26. Krupinski EA, Roehrig H, Furukawa T: Influence of film and monitor display luminance on observer performance and visual search. Acad Radiol 6:411-418, 1999
27. Blume H, Members of ACR/NEMA Working Group XI: The ACR/NEMA proposal for grey-scale display function standard. Proc SPIE Med Imaging 2707:344-360, 1996
28. Evanoff MG, Roehrig H, Giffords RS, et al: Calibration of medium-resolution monochrome cathode ray tube displays for the purpose of board examinations. J Digital Imaging 14:27-33, 2001
29. Groth DS, Bernatz SN, Fetterly KA, et al: Cathode ray tube quality control and acceptance testing program: Initial results for clinical PACS displays. Radiographics 21:719-732, 2001
30. Parr LF, Anderson AL, Glennon BK, et al: Quality-control issues on high-resolution diagnostic monitors. J Digital Imaging 14:22-26, 2001
31. Sowden PT, Davies IR, Roling P: Perceptual learning of the detection of features in x-ray images: A functional role for improvements in adults' visual sensitivity? J Exptl Psych: Human Percep Perform 26:379-390, 2000
32. Siegel EL, Reiner BI, Hooper F, et al: The effect of monitor image quality on the soft-copy interpretation of chest CR images. Proc SPIE Med Imaging 4323:42-46, 2001
33. Pizer SM: Intensity mappings to linearized displays. Comput Graphics Image Process 17:262-268, 1981
34. Pizer SM: Intensity mapping: Linearization, image-based, user-controlled. Proc SPIE Med Imaging 271:21-27, 1981
35. Johnston RE, Zimmerman JB, Rogers DC, et al: Perceptual standardization. Proc SPIE Med Imaging 536:44-49, 1985
36. Krupinski EA, Roehrig H: The influence of a perceptually linearized display on observer performance and visual search. Acad Radiol 7:8-13, 2000
37. Blaivas M: Color Doppler in the diagnosis of ectopic pregnancy in the emergency department: Is there anything beyond a mass and fluid? J Emerg Med 22:379-384, 2002
38. Beebe HG, Salles-Cunha SX, Scissons RP, et al: Carotid arterial ultrasound scan imaging: A direct approach to stenosis measurement. J Vasc Surg 29:838-844, 1999
39. Rehm K, Strother SC, Anderson JR, et al: Display of merged multimodality brain images using interleaved pixels with independent color scales. J Nuc Med 35:1815-1821, 1994
40. Chaparro A, Stromeyer CF, Huang EP, et al: Colour is what the eyes see best. Nature 361:348-350, 1993
41. Levkowitz H, Herman GT: Color scales for image data. IEEE Comp Graphics Applic 12:72-80, 1992
42. Mullen KT: The contrast sensitivity of human colour vision to red-green and blue-yellow chromatic gratings. J Physiol 359:381-400. 1985
43. Granger EM, Heurtley JC: Visual chromaticity modulation transfer function. JOSA 63:1173-1174, 1973
44. Behlen FM, Hemminger BM, Horii SC: Displays, in Kim Y, Horii SC (eds): Handbook of Medical Imaging Volume 3 Display and PACS. Bellingham, WA, SPIE Press, 2000, pp 403-440
45. Krupinski EA, Roehrig H: Pulmonary nodule detection and visual search: P45 and P104 monochrome versus color monitor displays. Acad Radiol 9:638-645, 2002
46. Krupinski EA, Evanoff M, Ovitt T, et al: Influence of image processing on chest radiograph interpretation and decision changes. Acad Radiol 5:79-85, 1998
47. Krupinski EA, Radvany M, Levy A, et al: Enhanced visualization processing: Effect on workflow. Acad Radiol 8:1127-1133, 2001
48. Koenker RM, Grover SA: Automated hands-free image manipulation and viewing: A useful macro feature that assists radiologists in the viewing of chest and extremity digital radiographs. J Digital Imaging 15:166-170, 2002
49. Bennett WF, Vaswani JA, Mendiola JA, et al: PACS monitors: An evolution of radiologists' viewing techniques. J Digital Imaging 15:171-174, 2002
50. Moll T, Douek P, Finet G, et al: Clinical assessment of a new stereoscopic digital angiography system. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 21:11-16, 1998
51. Rosenbaum AE, Huda W, Lieberman KA, et al: Binocular three-dimensional perception through stereoscopic generation from rotating images. Acad Radiol 7:21-26, 2000
52. Getty D: Stereoscopic digital mammography: Perceptual and display factors leading to improved early detection of breast cancer, in Peitgen HO (ed): Digital Mammography '02. Heidelberg, Germany, Springer-Verlag, 2003, pp 431-435
53. Erickson BJ, Bartholmai B: Computer-aided detection and diagnosis at the start of the third millennium. J Digital Imaging 15:59-68, 2002
54. Fields S, Lederman R, Buchbinder S, et al: Improved mammographic accuracy with CAD asasisted ranking of lesions, in Peitgen HO (ed): Digital Mammography '02. Heidelberg, Germany, Springer-Verlag, 2003, pp 292-296
55. Huo Z, Giger ML, Vyborny CJ, et al: Breast cancer: effectiveness of computer-aided diagnosis observer study with independent database of mammograms. Radiology 224:560-568, 2002
56. Vyborny CJ, Kukec C, Doi K: Experience with computer-aided detection in a low-volume mammography clinic, in Peitgen HO (ed): Digital Mammography '02. Heidelberg, Germany, Springer-Verlag, 2003, pp 387-390
57. Krupinski EA, Nishikawa RM: Comparison of eye position versus computer identified microcalcification clusters on mammograms. Med Phys 24:17-23, 1997
58. Poller WR, Zheng B, Sumkin JH, et al: Detecting abnormalities in non-cued areas of digitized mammograms: An observer experience. Proc SPIE Med Imaging 4686:84-88, 2002
59. Kundel HL, Nodine CF, Krupinski EA: Computer-displayed eye position as a visual aid to pulmonary nodule interpretation. Invest Radiol 25:890-896, 1990
60. Krupinski EA, Nodine CF, Kundel HL: Perceptual enhancement of tumor targets in chest x-ray images. Percep Psychophysics 53:519-526, 1993
61. Krupinski EA, Nodine CF, Kundel HL: A perceptually based method for enhancing pulmonary nodule recognition. Invest Radiol 28:289-294, 1993
62. Yunfang L, Wenjing W, Bingshuang H, et al: Visual strain and working capacity in computer operators. Homeostasis Health Dis 40:27-29, 2000
63. Takahasi K, Sasaki H, Saito T, et al: Combined effects of working environmental conditions in VDT work. Ergonomics 44:562-570, 2001
64. Rechichi C, Demoja CA, Scullica L: Psychology of computer use: XXXVI. Visual discomfort and different types of work at videodisplay terminals. Perceptual Motor Skills 82: 935-938, 1996
65. OSHA. 29 CFR Part 1910 [Docket No. S-777] RIN No. 1218-AB36 Ergonomics Program. Available at: www.osha.gov. Accessed November 20, 2002
66. Mutti DO, Zadnik K: Is computer use a risk factor for myopia? J Americ Optometric Assn 67:521-530, 1996
67. Sanchez-Roman FR, Perez-Lucio C, Juarez-Ruiz C, et al: Risk factors for asthenopia among computer terminal operators. Salud Publica de Mexico 38:189-196, 1996
68. Tyrrell RA, Leibowitz HW: The relation of vergence effort to reports of visual fatigue following prolonged near work. Human Factors 32:341-357, 1990
69. Watten RG, Lie I, Birketvedt O: The influence of long-term visual near-work on accommodation and vergence: A field study. J Human Ergology 23:27-39, 1994
70. Chi CF, Lin FT: A comparison of seven visual fatigue assessment techniques in three data-acquisition VDT tasks. Human Factors 40:577-590, 1998
71. Murata A, Uetake A, Otsuka M, et al: Proposal of an index to evaluate visual fatigue induced during visual display terminal tasks. Int J Human Comput Interaction 13:305-321, 201
72. Keyserling WM: A computer-aided system to evaluate postural stress in the workplace. Am Industrial Hygiene Assn J 47:641-649, 1986
73. Yamamoto S, Matsuoka S: Topographic EEG study of visual display terminal (VDT) performance with special reference to frontal midline theta waves. Brain Topogr 2:257-267, 1990
74. Saito K, Hosokawa T: Basic study of the VRT (visual reaction time): The effects of illumination and luminance. Int J Human Comput Interact 3:311-316, 1991
75. Roehrig H: The monochrome cathode ray tube display and its performance, in Kim Y, Horii SC (eds): Handbook of Medical Imaging Volume 3 Display and PACS. Bellingham, WA, SPIE Press, 2000, pp 155-220
76. Green PW: The effect of visual display terminal flicker on task performance. Dissertation abstracts international: Section B. Sciences Engin 56:7075, 1996
77. Takahaski K, Sasaki H, Saito T, et al: Combined effects of working environmental conditions in VDT work. Ergonomics 44:562-570, 2001
78. Sotoyama M, Jonai H, Saito S, et al: Analysis of ocular surface area for comfortable VDT workstation layout. Ergonomics 39:877-884, 1996
79. Turville K, Psihogios J, Ulmer T, et al: The effects of video display terminal height on the operator: A comparison of the 15" and 40" recommendation. Appl Ergonomics 29:239-246, 1998
80. Czaja SJ, Sharit J: Age differences in the performance of computer-based work. Psych Aging 8:59-67, 1993
81. Krupinski EA, Weinstein RS, Rozek LS: Experience-related differences in diagnosis from medical images displayed on monitors. Telemed J 2:101-108, 1996