Transferring behavioral technology across applications

Neurotoxicology and Teratology

Volumn 25, Issue 5, 2003, Pages 529-542

  Newland, M Christopher ^a   Pennypacker, H S ^b   Anger, W Kent ^c   Mele, Paul ^d  

^a AUBURN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA   (United States)

^c OREGON HEALTH AND SCIENCE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d U S ARMY MEDICAL RESEARCH AND MATERIEL COMMAND   (United States)

Author keywords

Applications; Behavioral technology; Transfer

Indexed keywords

BEHAVIOR; BEHAVIORAL SCIENCE; BIOENGINEERING; COMPREHENSION; CONFERENCE PAPER; LABORATORY; MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY; NATURAL SCIENCE; NEUROTOXICITY; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SCALE UP; TRAINING;

EID: 0041333161     PISSN: 08920362     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0892-0362(03)00036-9     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (65)

1. W.K. Anger, Neurobehavioral tests and systems to assess neurotoxic exposures in the workplace and community, Occup. Environ. Med. (in press).
2. Anger W.K., Rohlman D.S., Sizemore O.J. A comparison of instruction formats for administering a computerized behavioral test. Behav. Res. Meth. Instrum. 26:1994;209-212.
3. Anger W.K., Rohlman D.S., Sizemore O.J., Kovera C.A., Gibertini M., Ger J. Human behavioral assessment in neurotoxicology: producing appropriate test performance with written and shaping instructions. Neurotoxicol. Teratol. 18:1996;371-379.
4. Anger W.K., Storzbach D., Binder L.M., Campbell K.A., Rohlman D.S., Mccauley L., Kovera C.A., Davis K.L. Neurobehavioral deficits in Persian gulf veterans: evidence from a population-based study. J. Int. Neuropsychol. Soc. 5:1999;203-212.
5. Anger W.K., Rohlman D.S., Kirkpatrick J., Reed R.R., Lundeen C.A., Eckerman D.A. cTRAIN: a computer-aided training system developed in supercard for teaching skills using behavioral education principles. Behav. Res. Meth. Instrum. 33:2001;277-281.
6. Annual Book of ASTM Standards, Standards e1604-94, e1711-95, e1768-95, 2000.
7. Baxter N. Should women be routinely taught breast self-examination to screen for breast cancer? Can. Med. Assoc. J. 164:2001;1837-1846.
8. Blacks Law Dictionary. 1983;West Publishing, St. Paul, MN.
9. Branch M.N. Rate dependency, behavioral mechanisms, and behavioral pharmacology. J. Exp. Anal. Behav. 42:1984;511-522.
10. Branch M.N., Hackenberg T.D. Humans are animals, too: connecting animal research to human behavior and cognition. Donohue W.O. Learning and Behavior Therapy. 1998;Allyn & Bacon, Needham Heights, MA.
11. Brunsvold B.G., O'Reilley D.P. Drafting Patent License Agreements. 4th ed. 1998;The Bureau of National Affairs, Washington, DC.
12. Buelke-Sam J., Kimmel C.A., Adams J., Nelson C.J., Vorhees C.V., Wright D.C., St. Omer V., Korol B.A., Butcher R.E., Geyer M.A. Collaborative behavioral teratology study: results. Neurobehav. Toxicol. Teratol. 7:1985;591-624.
13. Cory-Slechta D.A. Implications of changes in schedule-controlled operant behavior. Weiss B., O'Donoghue J. Neurobehavioral Toxicity: Analysis and Interpretation. 1994;195-214 Raven Press, New York.
14. Davis J.M., Otto D.A., Weis D.E., Grant L.D. The comparative developmental neurotoxicity of lead in humans and animals. Neurotoxicol. Teratol. 12:1990;215-230.
15. Davis J.M., Elias R.W., Grant L.D. Current issues in human lead exposure and regulation of lead. Neurotoxicology. 14:1993;15-28.
16. Eckerman D.A., Lundeen C.A., Steele A., Fercho H.L., Ammerman T.A., Anger W.K. Interactive training versus reading to teach respiratory protection. J. Occup. Health Psychol. 7:2002;302-312.
17. Eisenberg E.M. Patent filing deadlines and bars to patentability. Biopharm. 2000;56-57.
18. Ferster C.B., Skinner B.F. Schedules of Reinforcement. 1957;Appleton-Century-Crofts, New York.
19. Hawkins R.P., Hursh D.E. Levels of research for clinical practice: it isn't as hard as you think. W. V. J. Psychol. Res. Pract. 1:1992;61-71.
20. Hench L.L. International collaboration in nuclear waste solidification. Nucl. Technol. 73:1986;188-198.
21. K.R. Johnson, About Morningside Learning Systems ( http://www.morningsideinfo.com ), 1997.
22. Johnston J.M. Distinguishing between applied research and practice. Behav. Anal. 19:1996;35-47.
23. Johnston J.M., Pennypacker H.S. Strategies and Tactics of Human Behavioral Research. 1980;Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.
24. Johnston J.M., Pennypacker H.S. Strategies and Tactics of Behavioral Research. 1993;Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.
25. Kelleher R., Morse W.H. Determinants of the specificity of behavioral effects of drugs. Ergeb. Physiol. 60:1968;1-56.
26. Kovera C.A., Anger W.K., Campbell K.A., Binder L.M., Storzbach D., Davis K.L., Rohlman D.S. Computer-administration of questionnaires: a health screening system (HSS) developed for veterans. Neurotoxicol. Teratol. 18:1996;511-518.
27. Laties V.G. Lessons from the history of behavioral pharmacology. Advances in Behavioral Pharmacology: Developmental Behavioral Pharmacology. 1986;21-39 Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.
28. Mace F.C. Basic research needed for stimulating the development of behavioral technologies. J. Exp. Anal. Behav. 61:1994;529-550.
29. Macphail R.C. Observational batteries and motor activity. Zentbl. Bakteriol. Mikrobiol. Hyg., B. 185:1987;21-27.
30. Macphail R.C., Peele D.B., Crofton K.M. Motor activity and screening for neurotoxicity. J. Am. Coll. Toxicol. 8:1989;117-125.
31. Megantz R.C. How to License Technology. 1996;Wiley, New York.
32. Moser V.C. Screening approaches to neurotoxicity: a functional observational battery. J. Am. Coll. Toxicol. 8:1989;85-93.
33. Moser V.C. Behavioral screening for neurotoxicity. Lowndes H.E., Reuhl K.R. Comprehensive Toxicology. 1997;Elsevier, New York.
34. Moxley R.A. Treatment-only designs. Seventh Annual Convention of the International Behaviorology Association, Gainesville, FL:1995.
35. National Institutes of Health Principles and guidelines for recipients of NIH research grants and contracts on obtaining and disseminating biomedical research resources: final notice. Fed. Regist. 64:1999;351-362.
36. Nelson C.J., Felton R.P., Kimmel C.A., Buelke-Sam J., Adams J. Collaborative behavioral teratology study: statistical approach. Neurotoxicol. Teratol. 7:1985;587-590.
37. Newland M.C. Operant behavior and the measurement of motor dysfunction. Weiss B., O'Donoghue J.L. Neurobehavioral Toxicity: Analysis and Interpretation. 1994;273-297 Raven Press, New York.
38. Newland M.C. Quantifying the molecular structure of behavior: separate effects of caffeine, cocaine, and adenosine agonists on interresponse times and lever-press durations. Behav. Pharmacol. 8:1997;1-16.
39. Osborne J.G. Reading and writing about research methods in behavior analysis: a personal account of a review of Johnston and Pennypacker's Strategies and Tactics of Behavioral Research (2nd. ed). J. Exp. Anal. Behav. 64:1995;247-255.
40. Pennypacker H.S. The challenge of technology transfer: buying in without selling out. Behav. Anal. 9:1986;147-156.
41. Pennypacker H.S. Is behavior analysis undergoing selection by consequences? Am. Psychol. 47:1992;1491-1498.
42. Pennypacker H.S., Hench L.L. Making behavioral technology transferable. Behav. Anal. 20:1997;97-108.
43. Peterson L., Homer A.L., Wonderlich S.A. The integrity of independent variables in behavior analysis. J. Appl. Behav. Anal. 15:1982;477-492.
44. Pryor K. Don't Shoot the Dog: The New Art of Teaching and Training. 1994;Bantam Books, New York.
45. Pryor G.T., Uyeno E.T., Tilson H.A., Mitchell C.L. Assessment of chemicals using a battery of neurobehavioral tests: a comparative study. Neurotoxicol. Teratol. 5:1983;91-117.
46. Reiter L.W., Macphail R.C. Factors influencing motor activity measurements in neurotoxicology. Mitchell C. Nervous System Toxicology. 1982;45-66 Raven Press, New York.
47. Rice D.C. Quantification of operant behavior. Toxicol. Lett. 43:1988;361-379.
48. Rohlman D.S., Sizemore O.J., Anger W.K., Kovera C.A. Computerized neurobehavioral testing: techniques for improving test instructions. Neurotoxicol. Teratol. 18:1996;407-412.
49. Rohlman D.S., Gimenes L.S., Ebbert C., Anger W.K., Bailey S.R., Mccauley L. Smiling faces and other rewards: using the behavioral assessment and research system (bars) with unique populations. Neurotoxicology. 21:2000;973-978.
50. Rohlman D.S., Bailey S.R., Anger W.K., Mccauley L. Assessment of neurobehavioral function with computerized tests in a population of Hispanic adolescents working in agriculture. Environ. Res. 85:2001;14-24.
51. Seiden L.S., Dykstra L.A. Psychopharmacology: A Biochemical and Behavioral Approach. 1977;Van Nostrand-Reinhold, New York.
52. M. Sidman, H.S. Pennypacker, Statement of purpose, 2000, Behavioral Technology Today [online] ( http://www.behavior.org/journals_BTT/BTT_index.cfm ).
53. Skinner B.F. The Behavior of Organisms. 1938/1981;Copley Publishing Group, Acton, MA.
54. Skinner B.F. The Shaping of a Behaviorist. 1979;Knopf, New York.
55. Storzbach D., Rohlman D.S., Anger W.K., Binder L.M., Campbell K.A. Neurobehavioral deficits in Persian Gulf veterans: additional evidence from a population-based study. Environ. Res. 85:2001;1-13.
56. Thomas D.B., Gao D.L., Self S.G., Allison C.J., Tao Y., Mahloch J., Ray R., Qin Q., Presley R., Porter P. Randomized trial of breast self-examination in Shanghai: methodology and preliminary results. [see comments] J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 89:1997;355-365.
57. United States Code Title 15 Chapter 16 - Technology Innovation, 1980.
58. US Environmental Protection Agency, Pesticide Assessment Guidelines, Subdivision f, Hazard Evaluation: Human and Domestic Animals, Addendum 10: Neurotoxicity, National Technical Information Service, Springfield, VA 22161, 1991 (EPA 540/09-91-123, PB 91-154617).
59. US Environmental Protection Agency Multi-substance rule for the testing of neurotoxicity: final notice. Fed. Regist. 58:1993;40262-40296.
60. Verhave T. The pigeon as a quality control engineer. Ulrich R., Stachnik T., Mabry J. Control of Human Behavior. Expanding the Behavioral Laboratory. vol. 1:1966;242-246 Scott Foresman, Glenview, IL.
61. Weiss B., Cory-Slechta D.A. Assessment of behavioral toxicity, principles and methods of toxicology. Wallace Hayes A. Principles and Methods of Toxicology. 1994;1091-1155 Raven Press, New York.
62. Weiss B., O'Donoghue J.L. Neurobehavioral Toxicity: Analysis and Interpretation. 1994;Raven Press, New York.
63. Wilkes G.W. Click! and Treat Training Kit. 1996;Click! and Treat Products, Phoenix, AZ.
64. Zeiler M. Schedules of reinforcement: the controlling variables. Honig W.K., Staddon J.E.R. Handbook of Operant Behavior. 1977;201-232 Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
65. Zeiler M.D. The sleeping giant: reinforcement schedules. J. Exp. Anal. Behav. 42:1984;485-493.