Relation of premorbid cognitive abilities to substance users' problems at treatment intake and improvements with substance abuse treatment and case management

American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse

Volumn 29, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 515-538

  Block, Robert I ^a   Bates, Marsha E ^b   Hall, James A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF IOWA   (United States)

^b RUTGERS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Achievement tests; Addiction Severity Index; Alcohol; Case management; Cognition; Drugs; Premorbid; Substance abuse; Telecommunications; Treatment; Treatment outcomes

Indexed keywords

ALCOHOL; CANNABIS; CENTRAL STIMULANT AGENT; COCAINE; DIAMORPHINE; PSYCHEDELIC AGENT; SEDATIVE AGENT;

ACADEMIC ACHIEVEMENT; ADDICTION SEVERITY INDEX; ADULT; APTITUDE TEST; ARTICLE; COGNITION; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; DRUG DEPENDENCE TREATMENT; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; GENERAL CONDITION IMPROVEMENT; HEALTH SERVICE; HUMAN; MALE; MORBIDITY; PATIENT CARE; PATIENT COUNSELING; PRIMARY SCHOOL; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; PSYCHIATRIC DIAGNOSIS; PSYCHOLOGIC ASSESSMENT; PSYCHOLOGIC TEST; PSYCHOTHERAPY; SCORING SYSTEM; SKILL; SOCIAL WORK; SUBSTANCE ABUSE; TELECOMMUNICATION; TREATMENT OUTCOME; UNITED STATES;

ADULT; ALCOHOLISM; CASE MANAGEMENT; COGNITION; COMORBIDITY; COUNSELING; EDUCATIONAL STATUS; FEMALE; HUMANS; IOWA; MALE; OUTCOME AND PROCESS ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; PSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS; SCHOOLS; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; SUBSTANCE ABUSE TREATMENT CENTERS; SUBSTANCE-RELATED DISORDERS; TELECOMMUNICATIONS;

EID: 0041333072     PISSN: 00952990     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1081/ADA-120023456     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Kadden RM, Skerker PM. Treatment decision making and goal setting. In: McCrady BS, Epstein EE, eds. Addictions: A Comprehensive Guidebook. New York: Oxford, 1999:216-231.
2. Snow RE. Aptitude-treatment interaction as a framework for research on individual differences in psychotherapy. J Consult Clin Psychol 1991; 59:205-216.
3. Kadden RM, Cooney NL, Getter H, Litt MD. Matching alcoholics to coping skills or interactional therapies: posttreatment results. J Consult Clin Psychol 1989; 57:698-704.
4. Cooney NL, Kadden RM, Litt MD, Getter H. Matching alcoholics to coping skills or interactional therapies: two-year follow-up results. J Consult Clin Psychol 1991; 59:589-601.
5. Jaffee AJ, Rounsaville BJ, Chang G, Schottenfeld RS, Meyer RE, O'Malley S. Naltrexone, relapse prevention, and supportive therapy with alcoholics: an analysis of patient-treatment matching. J Consult Clin Psychol 1996; 64:1044-1053.
6. Rychtarik RG, Connors GJ, Whitney RB, McGillicuddy NB, Fitterling JM, Wirtz PW. Treatment settings for persons with alcoholism: evidence of matching clients to inpatient versus outpatient care. J Consult Clin Psychol 2000; 68:277-289.
7. Morgenstern J, Bates ME. Effects of executive function impairment on change processes and substance use outcomes in 12-step treatment. J Stud Alcohol 1999; 60(6):846-855.
8. Bates ME, Convit A. Neuropsychology and neuroimaging of alcohol and drug abuse. In: Calev A, ed. The Assessment of Neuropsychological Functions in Psychiatric Disorders. Washington, D.C.: American Psychiatric Press, 1999; 373-445.
9. Knight RG, Longmore BE. Clinical Neuropsychology of Alcoholism. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1994.
10. Culver CM, King FW. Neuropsychological assessment of undergraduate marijuana and LSD users. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1974; 31(5):707-711.
11. Block RI, Erwin WJ, Ghoneim MM. Chronic drug use and cognitive impairments. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 2002; 73(3):491-504.
12. Block RI, Ghoneim MM. Effects of chronic marijuana use on human cognition. Psychopharmacology 1993; 110(1-2):219-228.
13. Hall JA, Vaughan MS, Vaughn T, Block R, Schut A. Iowa Case Management for rural drug abuse: preliminary results. Care Manag J 1999; 1(4):232-243.
14. Hall JA, Huber DL. Telephone management in substance abuse treatment. Telemed J E Health 2000; 6(4):401-407.
15. Huber DL, Hall JA, Vaughn T. The dose of case management interventions. Lippincott's Case Manag 2001; 6:119-126.
16. Vaughan-Sarrazin MS, Hall JA, Rick GS. Impact of case management on use of health services by rural clients in substance abuse treatment. J Drug Issues 2000; 30:435-463.
17. Hall JA, Carswell C, Walsh E, Huber DL, Jampoler JS. Iowa Case Management: innovative social casework. Soc Work 2002; 47(2):132-141.
18. Vaughan Sarrazin MS, Hall JA, Richards C, Carswell C. A comparison of computer-based versus paper and pencil assessment of drug use. Res Soc Work Pract 2002; 12(5):669-683.
19. McLellan AT, Kushner H, Metzger D, Peters R, Smith I, Grissom G, Pettinati H, Argeriou M. The fifth edition of the Addiction Severity Index. J Subst Abuse Treat 1992; 9(3):199-213.
20. Marcus S, Robins LN, Bucholz K. Quick Diagnostic Interview Schedule III-R. St. Louis: Washington University School of Medicine, 1991.
21. Hoover HD, Dunbar SB, Frisbie DA. Guide to Research and Development: The Iowa Tests of Basic Skills, Forms K, L, & M. Iowa City, IA: The University of Iowa, 2001.
22. Hieronymus AN, Lindquist EF, Hoover HD. Manual for School Administrators, Iowa Tests of Basic Skills. Chicago: Riverside Publishing, 1982.
23. Hendricks VM, Kaplan CD, Van Limbeck H, Geerlings P. The Addiction Severity Index: reliability and validity in a Dutch addict sample. J Subst Abuse Treat 1989; 6:133-141.
24. Hodgins DC, el-Guebaly N. More data on the Addiction Severity Index: reliability and validity with the mentally ill substance abuser. J of Nerv Ment Dis 1992; 180:197-201.
25. McLellan AT, Luborsky L, Cacciola J, Griffith J, McGahan P, O'Brien CP. Guide to the Addiction Severity Index: Background, Administration, and Field Testing Results. Rockville, MD: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, 1985.
26. McGahan P, Griffith J, McLellan AT. Composite Scores from the Addiction Severity Index: Manual and Computer Software. Philadelphia, PA: Veterans Administration Press, 1986.
27. Bucholz KK, Robins LN, Shayka JJ, Przybeck TR, Helzer JE, Goldring E, Klein MH, Greist JH, Erdman HP, Skare SS. Performance of two forms of a computer psychiatric screening interview: version I of the DISSI. J Psychiatr Res 1991; 25(3):117-129.
28. Robins LN, Helzer JE, Croughan J, Ratcliff KS. National Institute of Mental Health Diagnostic Interview Schedule. Its history, characteristics, and validity. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1981; 38(4):381-389.
29. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Third Edition, Revised. Washington, D.C.: American Psychiatric Association, 1987.
30. Vaughn T, Sarrazin MV, Saleh SS, Huber DL, Hall JA. Participation and retention in drug abuse treatment services research. J Subst Abuse Treat 2002; 23(4):387-397.
31. SAS Institute Inc. The PRINCOMP Procedure. In: SAS/STAT User's Guide, Version 6, Fourth Edition, Volume 2. Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc., 1989:1241-1263.
32. McDermott PA, Alterman AI, Brown L, Zaballero A, Snider EC, McKay JR. Construct refinement and confirmation for the Addiction Severity Index. Psychol Assess 1996; 8:182-189.
33. Stevens JP. Applied Multivariate Statistics for the Social Sciences. 4th ed. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 2002.
34. Littell RC, Stroup WW, Freund RJ. SAS for Linear Models. 4th ed. Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc., 2002.
35. Rogosa D. Comparing nonparallel regression lines. Psychol Bull 1980; 88(2):307-321.
36. Anderson S, Auquier A, Hauck WH, Oakes D, Vandaele W, Weisberg HI. Statistical Methods for Comparative Studies: Techniques for Bias Reduction. New York: Wiley, 1980.