General practitioners, revalidation and appraisal: A cross sectional survey of attitudes, beliefs and concerns in Lincolnshire

Medical Education

Volumn 37, Issue 9, 2003, Pages 778-785

  Middlemass, Jo ^a   Siriwardena, A Niroshan ^a,b  

^a West Lincolnshire Primary Care Trust   (United Kingdom)

^b DE MONTFORT UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

*clinical competence; Attitude; Education, medical, continuing *standards; Educational measurement; England; Family practice *standards methods; Questionnaires

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; COHORT ANALYSIS; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; FEMALE; GENERAL PRACTITIONER; GOVERNMENT; HUMAN; MALE; MEDICAL EDUCATION; NORMAL HUMAN; PHYSICIAN ATTITUDE; PRIMARY MEDICAL CARE; QUESTIONNAIRE; VALIDATION PROCESS;

ADULT; ATTITUDE OF HEALTH PERSONNEL; CERTIFICATION; EDUCATION, MEDICAL, CONTINUING; EDUCATIONAL MEASUREMENT; ENGLAND; FAMILY PRACTICE; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; QUESTIONNAIRES;

EID: 0041331500     PISSN: 03080110     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2923.2003.01469.x     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. General Medical Council. Revalidating Doctors. London: General Medical Council 2000.
2. Department of Health. Supporting Doctors, Protecting Patients London: Department of Health 1999.
3. Department of Health. The NHS Plan. London: Department of Health 2000.
4. Hayes S. GMC's proposals for revalidation. Appraisal is helpful only if done well. BMJ 2001;322:358.
5. Southgate L, Pringle M. Revalidation in the United Kingdom: general principles based on experience in general practice. BMJ 1999;319:1180-3.
6. Wakeford R. GMC's proposals for revalidation would not be accurate, economical or fair. BMJ 2000;321:1220.
7. Newble D. GMC's proposals for revalidation. Purpose of revalidation process must be agreed on. BMJ 2001;322:358.
8. Jolly B, McAvoy P, Southgate L. GMCs proposals for revalidation. Effective revalidation system looks at how doctors practise and quality of patients' experience. BMJ 2001;322:358-9.
9. Martin D, Harrison P, Joesbury H, Wilson R. Appraisal for General Practitioners. Sheffield: Sheffield University, School of Health and Related Research 2001.
10. Norusis MJ. SPSS Base Manual 4.0. Chicago: SPSS Inc. 1990.
11. General Medical Council. Good Medical Practice. London: General Medical Council 1997.
12. Weightman J. Managing People in the Health Service. London: Institute of Personnel Development 1996.
13. Latham GP, Wexley KN. Increasing Productivity Through Performance Appraisal. Reading, Massachusetts: Addison-Wesley 1981.
14. Riley W. Appraising appraisal. BMJ Career Focus 1998;317:2.
15. The Standing Committee on Postgraduate Medical and Dental Education (SCOPME). Appraising Doctors and Dentists in Training: a Working Paper for Consultation. London: SCOPME 1996.
16. Oxley J. Appraising doctors and dentists in training. BMJ Career Focus 1997;315:S2.
17. Ramsey PG, Wenrich MD, Carline JD, Inui TS, Larson EB, LoGerfo JP. Use of peer ratings to evaluate physician performance. JAMA 1993;269:1655-60.
18. Brown SP, Leigh TW. A new look at psychological climate and its relationship to job involvement, effort and performance. J Appl Psychol 1996;81:358-68.
19. Charlton R. Continuing professional development and training. BMJ Career Focus 2001;323:7309.
20. Harrison R. Training and Development. London: Institute of Personnel Management 1988.