Morbidity of the patients after Caesarean section;Morbidita pacientok po cisárskom reze

Ceska Gynekologie

Volumn 68, Issue 4, 2003, Pages 293-297

  Višňovský, Jozef ^a,b   Tomas S ^a   Danko, J ^a   Fabusva O ^a   Dokus K ^a  

^a JLF UK   (Slovakia)

^b NONE   (Slovakia)

Author keywords

Caesarean section; Maternal morbidity; Prevention; Prophylaxis

Indexed keywords

ANTIBIOTIC AGENT; HEPARIN; NADROPARIN;

ARTICLE; CESAREAN SECTION; DISEASE SEVERITY; EPIDEMIOLOGICAL DATA; FEMALE; HUMAN; MATERNAL MORBIDITY; MORTALITY; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PREGNANCY TERMINATION; PREMATURITY; PRIMARY PREVENTION; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SLOVAKIA; TREATMENT INDICATION; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

CESAREAN SECTION; FEMALE; HUMANS; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; PREGNANCY; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES;

EID: 0041322678     PISSN: 12107832     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. Broe, S., Khoo, S.: How safe is caesarean section in the current practise? A survey of mortality and serious morbidity. Aust. N. Z. J. Obstet. Gynaecol., 29, 1989, s. 93-98.
2. Edi-Osagie, E. C. O., Hopkins, R. E., Ogbo, V. et al.: Uterine exteriorisation at caesarean section: influence on maternal morbidity. Brit. J. Obstet. Gynaecol., 105, 1998, s. 1070-1078.
3. Gorbe, E., Hajdu, J., Harmath, A.: The effect of the delivery method on the mortality of very low birth weight infants in case of breech presentation. Orv. Hetil., 15, 1997, s. 1561-1564.
4. Hillan, E. M.: Postoperative morbidity following caesarean delivery. Advanced Nursing, 22, 1995, s. 1035-1042.
5. Lieberman, E.: Predictors of Caesarean delivery. Curr. Prob. Obstet. Gynecol. Fertil., 20, 1997, s. 98-101.
6. Lowe, J. A., Klassen, D. F., Loup, R. J.: Caesarean section in the United States PAS hospitals. PAS Reporter, 14, 1976, s. 37-38.
7. Perveen, F. C., Shah, Q.: Obstetric outcome after one previous caesarean section. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Res., 23, 1997, s. 341-346.
8. Sachs, B. P., Kobelin, C., Castro, M. A., Frigoletto, F.: The risks of lowering the Caesarean delivery rate. N. Engl. J. Med., 340, 1999, s. 54-57.
9. Selvin, S.: Statistical analysis of epidemiological data. New York: Oxford University Press, 1996, s. 547.
10. Smirh, G. C. S.: A population study of birthweight and the risk of caesarean section: Scotland 1980-1996. Brit. J. Obstet. Gynaecol., 107, 2000, s. 740-744.
11. Štembera, Z.: Analýza zvýšení frekvence císařských řezů v České republice. Čes. Gynek., 60, 1995, s. 193-191.
12. Sterr, P.: Caesarean section: an evolving procedure? Brit. J. Obstet. Gynecol., 105, 1998, s. 1052-1055.