Market structure in U.S. southern pine roundwood

Journal of Forest Economics

Volumn 9, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 97-117

  Bingham, Matthew F ^a   Prestemon, Jeffrey P ^b   MacNair, Douglas J ^a   Abt, Robert C ^c  

^a Triangle Economic Research   (United States)

^b USDA FOREST SERVICE   (United States)

^c NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Cointegration; Law of One Price; Log markets; Meta analysis; Pine

Indexed keywords

PROBABILITY; PULP; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; WOOD;

MARKET STRUCTURE;

FORESTRY;

COMMODITY PRICE; MARKET CONDITIONS; PRICE DYNAMICS; TIMBER MARKET;

UNITED STATES;

PINUS ECHINATA;

EID: 0041319539     PISSN: 11046899     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1078/1104-6899-00025     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Abt RC, Cubbage FW and Pacheco G (2000) Southern forest resource assessment using the sub-regional timber supply (SRTS) model. Forest Products Journal 50 (4): 25-33.
2. Adams DM and Haynes RW (1980) The 1980 softwood timber assessment market model: structure, projections and policy simulations. Forest Science Monograph No. 22.
3. Alavalapati JRR Adamowicz WL and Luckert MK (1997) A cointegration analysis of Canadian wood pulp prices. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 79 (3): 975-986.
4. Ardeni PG (1989) Does the law of one price really hold for commodity prices? American Journal of Agricultural Economics 71 (3): 661-669.
5. Baffes J (1991) Some further evidence on the law of one price: The law of one price still holds. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 73 (4): 1264-1273.
6. Barrett CB (1996) Market analysis methods: Are our enriched toolkits well-suited to enlivened markets? American Journal of Agricultural Economics 78 (3): 825-289.
7. Baulch B (1997) Transfer costs, spatial arbitrage, and testing for food market integration. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 79 (2): 477-487,
8. Buccola ST (1985) Pricing efficiency in agricultural markets: issues, methods, and results. Western Journal of Agricultural Economics 14 (1): 111-121.
9. Buongiorno J and Uusivuori J (1992) The law of one price in the trade of forest products: Co-integration tests for U.S. exports of pulp and paper. Forest Science 38 (3): 539-553.
10. Dickey DA and Fuller WA (1979) Distribution of the estimators for autoregressive time series with a unit root. The Journal of The American Statistical Association 74 (366): 427-431.
11. Dykstra DP and Kallio M (1987) Introduction to the IISA forest sector model. In: The Global Forest Sector: An Analytical Perspective (eds. M Kallio, DP Dykstra, and CS Binkley): 139-167. Wiley and Sons, New York.
12. Engle RF and Granger CWJ (1987) Co-integration and error correction: representation, estimation, and testing. Econometrica 55 (2): 251-276.
13. Espey M (1998) Gasoline demand revisited: an international meta-analysis of elasticities. Energy Economics 20 (3): 273-295.
14. Faminow MD and Benson BL (1990) Integration of spatial markets. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 72 (1): 49-62.
15. Gonzalo J (1994) Five Alternative methods of estimating long-run equilibrium relationships. Journal of Econometrics 60 (1/2): 203-233.
16. Goodwin BK and Schroeder TC (1991) Cointegration tests and spatial linkages in regional cattle markets. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 73 (2): 452-464.
17. Guan H and Munn IA (2000) Harvest restrictions: An analysis of new capital expenditures in the Pacific Northwest and the South. Journal of Forestry 98 (4): 11-17.
18. Haight RG and Holmes TP (1991) Stochastic price models and optimal tree cutting: Results for loblolly pine. Natural Resource Modeling 5 (4): 423-443.
19. Hall A (1994) Testing for a unit root in time series with pretest data-based model selection. Journal of Business Economics and Statistics 12 (4): 461-470.
20. Hänninen R Toppinen A and Ruuska P (1997) Testing arbitrage in newsprint imports to United Kingdom and Germany. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 27 (12): 1946-1952.
21. Hedges LV and Olkin I (1985) Statistical Methods For Meta-Analysis. Academic Press, Boston.
22. Holmes TP (1991) Price and welfare effects of catastrophic forest damage from southern pine beetle epidemics. Forest Science 37 (2): 500-516.
23. Howell M and Levins R (1998) Arkansas's timber industry: An assessment of timber product output and use, 1996. USDA Forest Service Research Bulletin SRS-28. Asheville, North Carolina.
24. Johansen S (1991) Estimation and hypothesis testing of cointegration vectors in Gaussian vector autoregressive models. Econometrica 59 (6): 1551-1580.
25. Johansen S and Juselius K (1990) The maximum likelihood estimation and inference on cointegration with application to demand for money. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics 52 (2): 169-210.
26. Johnson TG Gober JR and Nix JS (1997a) Alabama's timber industry: An assessment of timber product output and use, 1995. USDA Forest Service Research Bulletin SRS-27, Asheville, North Carolina.
27. Johnson TG Jenkins A and Brown DR (1997b) North Carolina's timber industry: An assessment of timber product output and use, 1995. USDA Forest Service Research Bulletin SRS-18, Asheville, North Carolina.
28. Johnson TG Jenkins A and Haxby TS (1997c) Florida's timber industry: An assessment of timber product output and use, 1995. USDA Forest Service Research Bulletin SRS-13. Asheville, North Carolina.
29. Johnson TG Jenkins A Scrivani JA and Foreman JM (1997d) Virginia's timber industry: An assessment of timber product output and use, 1995. USDA Forest Service Research Bulletin SRS-19, Asheville, North Carolina.
30. Johnson TG Jenkins A Scrivani JA and Foreman JM (1997e) Georgia's timber industry: An assessment of timber product output and use, 1995. USDA Forest Service Research Bulletin SRS-14. Asheville, North Carolina.
31. Johnson TG Jenkins Stratton DP and Bischoff PS (1997f) South Carolina's timber industry: An assessment of timber product output and use, 1995. USDA Forest Service Research Bulletin SRS-16. Asheville, North Carolina.
32. Jung C and Doroodian K (1994) The law of one price for U.S. software lumber: A multivariate cointegration test. Forest Science 40 (4): 595-600.
33. Lang MG and Rosa F (1981) Price variation in direct and terminal markets for cattle and hogs: An Illinois case. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 63 (4): 704-707.
34. MacKinnon JG (1991) Critical Values for Cointegration Tests. In Long Run Economic Relationships (eds. RF Engle and CWJ Granger). Oxford University Press.
35. McNew K and Fackler PL (1997) Testing market equilibrium: Is cointegration informative? The Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 22 (2): 191-207.
36. Mulligan GF and Fik TJ (1989) Price variation in spatial oligopolies. Geographic Analysis 21 (1): 32-46.
37. Murray BC (1995) Oligopsony, vertical integration, and output substitution: welfare effects in US pulpwood markets. Land Economics 71 (2): 193-206.
38. Murray BC and Wear DN (1998) Federal timber restrictions and interregional arbitrage in U.S. lumber. Land Economics 74 (1): 76-91.
39. Nagubadi V Munn IA and Tahai A (2001) Integration of hardwood stumpage markets in the south-central United States. Journal of Forest Economics 7 (1): 69-98.
40. Norris Foundation (1977-1997) Timber Mart-South. The Daniel B Warnell School of Forest Resources, University of Georgia. Athens, Georgia.
41. Pantula SG Gonzalez-Farias G and Fuller WA (1994) A comparison of unit root criteria. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics 12 (4): 449-459.
42. Phillips PC (1998) New tools for understanding spurious regressions. Econometrica 66 (6): 1299-1325.
43. Prestemon JP and Holmes TP (2000) Timber price dynamics following a natural catastrophe. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 82 (1): 145-160.
44. Prestemon JP and Pye JM (2000) A technique for merging areas in Timber Mart-South data. Southern Journal of Applied Forestry 24 (4): 219-229.
45. Ravallion M (1986) Testing market integration. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 68 (1): 102-109.
46. Samuelson P (1952) Spatial price equilibrium and linear programming. American Economic Review 42 (3): 283-303.
47. Said SE and Dickey DA (1984) Testing for unit roots in autoregressive moving average models of unknown order. Biometrika 71 (3): 599-607.
48. Schnute J (1987) Data uncertainty, model ambiguity, and model identification. Natural Resource Modeling 2 (2): 159-212.
49. Smith VK and Kaoru Y (1990) Signals or noise? Explaining the variation in recreation benefit estimates. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 72 (2): 419-433.
50. Söderlind P and Vredin A (1996) Applied cointegration analysis in the mirror of macroeconomic theory. Journal of Applied Econometrics 11 (4): 363-381.
51. Stanley TD (1998) New wine in old bottles: A meta-analysis of Ricardian equivalence. Southern Economic Journal 64 (3): 713-727.
52. Stratton DP and Wright RC (1998) Tennessee's timber industry: An assessment of timber product output and use, 1995. USDA Forest Service Research Bulletin SRS-31. Asheville, North Carolina.
53. Stratton DP Howell DP and Wright RC (1998) Mississippi's timber industry: An assessment of timber product output and use, 1995. USDA Forest Service Research Bulletin SRS-29. Asheville, North Carolina.
54. Takayama T and Judge GG (1964) Equilibrium among spatially separated markets: A reformulation. Econometrica 32 (4): 510-523.
55. Tomek WG (1980) Price behavior on a declining terminal market. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 62 (3): 434-444.
56. Toppinen A and Toivonen R (1998) Roundwood market integration in Finland: A multivariate cointegration analysis. Journal of Forest Economics 4 (3): 241-266.
57. Uri ND and Boyd R (1990) Considerations on modeling the market for softwood lumber in the United States. Forest Science 36 (3): 680-692.