Focus on motivation in the work rehabilitation planning process: A qualitative study from the employer's perspective

Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation

Volumn 13, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 159-167

  Gardt, Gunvor ^a   Larsson, Agneta ^a  

^a LULEÅ UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Employer; Motivation; Work rehabilitation planning

Indexed keywords

CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPETENCE; CONVERSATION; CREATIVITY; DAILY LIFE ACTIVITY; ECONOMIC ASPECT; EMPLOYABILITY; EMPLOYER; EXPERIENCE; HEALTH CARE PLANNING; HUMAN; JOB PERFORMANCE; MOTIVATION; PROCESS MODEL; QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS; REVIEW; SWEDEN; TREATMENT PLANNING; VOCATIONAL REHABILITATION; WORK CAPACITY; WORK ENVIRONMENT; WORKPLACE;

ADULT; HUMANS; MOTIVATION; OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH; PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; QUESTIONNAIRES; REHABILITATION, VOCATIONAL; SWEDEN;

EID: 0041317207     PISSN: 10530487     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/A:1024901201414     Document Type: Review

References (26)

1. Government Bill 1990:91:140. Working environment and rehabilitation (in Swedish). Stockholm: The Government, 1990.
2. SoS-report No.: 1993:10. Rehabilitation within health care, for all ages and diagnoses (in Swedish). Stockholm: The National Board of Health and Welfare, the Federation of County Councils, The Swedish Association of Local Authorities, 1993.
3. SOU Report No.: 1988:41. Early and coordinated rehabilitation - Report of the Rehabilitation commission (in Swedish). Stockholm: Ministry of Social affairs, 1988.
4. Jeppsson-Grassman E. Work life demands and individual suffering (Report No. 57). Stockholm: Stockholm University, 1992.
5. Steers RM, Porter LW. Motivation and work behavior. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1991.
6. Lewthwaite R. Motivational considerations in physical activity involvement. Phys Ther 1990; 70(12): 808-819.
7. Geelen RJGM, Soons PHGM. Rehabilitation: An everyday motivation model. Patient Educ Couns 1996; 28: 69-25.
8. Gruninger UJ. Patient education: An example of one-to-one communication. J Hum Hypertens 1995; 9: 155-125.
9. Paulsberg AG. How do we motivate patients to activity? Omsorg 1995; 2: 22-23.
10. Grahn B. Quality of life, motivation and costs in multidisciplinary occupational rehabilitation. PhD Thesis, Department of Physical Therapy, Lund University, 1999.
11. Gard G, Sandberg A-C. Motivating factors for return to work. Physiother Res Int 1998; 3(2): 100-108.
12. Andersson SI. Appraisal, coping, motivational factors and gender in vocational rehabilitation. Scand J Soc Med 1996; 24: 161-168.
13. Gard G. Work motivating factors in rehabilitation: A brief review. Phys Ther Rev 2001; 6: 85-89.
14. Patton MQ. Qualitative evaluation and research methods. Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 1990.
15. Burnard P. A method of analysing interview transcripts in qualitative research. Nurs Educ Today 1991; 11: 461-466.
16. Downe-Wamboldt B. Content analysis: Method, applications, and issues. Health Care Women Int 1992; 13: 313-321.
17. Söderberg S, Lundman B. Transition experienced by women with fibromyalgia. Health Care Women Int 2001; 22:617-631.
18. Law M, Baptiste S, Mills J. Client-centerd practice: What does it mean and does it make a difference. Can J Occup Ther 1995; 62: 250-257.
19. Duvall C. Developing freedom to act. Empowerment in the knowledge organization. Participation Empowerment Int J 1999; 7(6): 204-212.
20. Malone TW. Is empowerment just a fad? Sloan Manage Rev 1997; 38(2): 23-35.
21. McDougall T. Patient empowerment: Fact or fiction? Ment Health Nurs 1997; 17(1): 4-5.
22. Dannemark B, Kullberg B. Cooperation - A new working strategy (in Swedish). Lund: Studentlitteratur, 1999.
23. Shaw L, Segal R, Polatajko H, and Harburn K. Understanding return to work behaviors: Promoting the importance of individual perceptions in the study of return to work. Disabil Rehabil 2002; 24(4): 185-195.
24. Goleman D. Emotional intelligence. New York: Bantam, 1995.
25. Gyllensten AL, Gard G, Salford E, Ekdahl C. Interaction between patient and physical therapist: A qualitative study reflecting the physical therapist's perspective. Physiother Res Int 1999; 4(2): 89-109.
26. Grape O. Between the stick and the carrot. A case study of the Rehabilitation reform of 1992 (Swedish text with a summary in English). PhD thesis, the Faculty of Social Sciences, Umeå University, 2001.