Floral resources of Karnataka: A geographic perspective

Current Science

Volumn 83, Issue 7, 2002, Pages 810-813

  Ganeshaiah, K N ^a,b   Kathuria, Sagar ^a   Uma Shaanker, R ^a,b  

^a JAWAHARLAL NEHRU CENTRE FOR ADVANCED SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH   (India)

^b UNIVERSITY OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES   (India)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0041306108     PISSN: 00113891     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (13)

1. Gadgil, M. and Rao, P. R. S., in Nurturing Biodiversity: An Indian Agenda, Centre for Environment Education, Ahmedabad, 1998.
2. Prasad, S. N., Curr. Sci., 1998, 75, 228-235.
3. Ganeshaiah, K. N. and Uma Shaanker, R., ibid, 1998, 75, 292-298.
4. Ganeshaiah, K. N. and Uma Shaanker, R., GIS@Development, 1999. III, 67-69.
5. Wilson, E. O., Science, 2000, 289, 2279.
6. Synonymy has been a problem haunting the databases of this sort. However, our database structure permits tracking the synonyms associated with every valid name according to the data from the flora, and we have attempted to carefully track and resolve them. We have also taken the help of lists provided by the International Plant Names Index.
7. Mudgul, V. and Hajra, P. K. (eds), in Floristic Diversity and Conservation Strategies in India, BSI, Kolkata, 1999, vol. 1, p. 8.
8. Singh, N. P. et al., ibid, 1999, vol. 2, pp. 975-991.
9. Barthlott, W., Biedinger, N., Braun, G., Feig, F., Kier. G. and Mutke, J., Acta Bot. Fenn., 1999, 162, p. 103-110.
10. Endemicity is used here with a restricted meaning: it is defined relative to the distribution of the species within Karnataka and hence not necessarily endemic in the usual sense.
11. Ganeshaiah, K. N. et al., Curr. Sci., 1997, 73, 128-133.
12. Ganeshaiah, K. N. and Uma Shaanker, R., Biodiver. Conserv., 2000, 9, 953-963.
13. Cronquist, A., in The Evolution and Classification of Flowering Plants, New York Botanical Gardens, New York, 1988, 2nd edn.