Adhesion of a glass-ionomer root canal sealer to human dentine

Australian Endodontic Journal

Volumn 29, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 20-22

  Najar, A L ^a   Saquy, P C ^a   Vansan, L P ^a   Sousa Neto, M D ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF RIBEIRÃO PRETO   (Brazil)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BISMUTH; CALCIUM HYDROXIDE; CHELATING AGENT; DRUG DERIVATIVE; EDETIC ACID; EDTAC; EPOXY RESIN; GLASS IONOMER; GROSSMAN SEALER; KETAC ENDO; ROOT CANAL FILLING MATERIAL; SEALER 26; ZINC OXIDE EUGENOL;

ADHESION; ARTICLE; CHEMISTRY; DENTAL BONDING; DENTAL CARE; DENTAL SURGERY; DENTIN; HUMAN; INSTRUMENTATION; MATERIALS TESTING; MECHANICAL STRESS; ULTRASTRUCTURE;

ADHESIVENESS; BISMUTH; CALCIUM HYDROXIDE; CHELATING AGENTS; DENTAL BONDING; DENTAL STRESS ANALYSIS; DENTIN; EDETIC ACID; EPOXY RESINS; GLASS IONOMER CEMENTS; HUMANS; MATERIALS TESTING; ROOT CANAL FILLING MATERIALS; SMEAR LAYER; STRESS, MECHANICAL; ZINC OXIDE-EUGENOL CEMENT;

EID: 0041303501     PISSN: 13291947     EISSN: 17474477     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1747-4477.2003.tb00490.x     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Cohen S., Burns R.C. In Pathways of the pulp. St. Louis: The C.V Mosby Company, 6th Ed., 1996.
2. Grossman L.I. Physical properties of root canal cements. J Endod 1976; 2: 166-75.
3. Ǿrstuvik D.. Eriksen H.M., Beyer-Olsen EM. Adhesive properties and leakage of root canal sealers in vitro. Int Endod J 1983; 16: 59-63.
4. White R.R., Goidman M., Lin PS. The influence of the smeared layer upon dentinal tubule penetration by endodontic filling materials. J Endod 1984; 10: 558-62.
5. Kennedy W, Walker WA., Gough R.W Smear layer removal effects on apical leakage. J Endod 1986; 12: 2 1-7.
6. Economides N., Lioiios E.. Kolokuris I ., Beltes P Long-term evaluation of the influence of smear layer removal on the sealing ability of different sealers. J Endod 1999; 25: 123-25.
7. McComb D.. Smith D.C., Beagrie G.S. The results of in vivo endodontic chemomechanical instrumentation - a scanning electron microscopic study. J Br Endod SOC 1976; 9: 1 1-8.
8. Yamada R.S., Armas A, Goldmon M. A scanning electron microscopic Comparison of a high volume final flush with several irrigating solutions: part 3. J Endod 1983; 9: 137-42.
9. Gettieman B.H., Messer H.H., ElDeeb M.E. Adhesion of sealer cements to dentin with and without the smear layer. J Endod 1991; 17: 15-20.
10. Garberoglio R., Becce C. Smear layer removal by root canal irrigants. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1994; 78: 359-67.
11. Sen B.H., Wesselink P.R., Türkün M. The smear layer: a phenomenon in root canal therapy. Int Endod J 1995: 28: 141-8.
12. Kouvas V. Liohos E.. Vossiiiadis L.. Parissis-Messimeris S.. Boutsioukn A. Influence of smear layer on depth of penetration of three endodontic sealers: an SEM study. Endod Dent Traumatol 1998; 14: 191-5.
13. Souso-Neto M.D., Guimuroes L.F, Guerisoii D.. Saquy PC.. Pécoru J.D. Influence of different kinds of rosins and hydrogenated resins on the setting time of Grossrnan cements. Rev Odontol USP 1999; 13: 83--7.
14. Sousa-Neto M.D., Guimarães L.F. Guerisoii D., Saquy PC., Pécoru J.D. Effect of different grades of gum rosins and hydrogenated resins on the solubility, disintegration and dimensional alterations of Grossman cement. J Endod 1999; 25: 477-80.
15. Grossman L.I. An improved root canal cement. J Am Dent Assoc 1958: 56: 381-5.
16. Branstetter J., Fruunhofer/.A. The physical properties and sealing action of endodontic sealer cements: a review of the literature. J Endod 1982; 8: 3 12-6.
17. Hyde D.G. Physical properties of root canal sealers containing calcium hydroxide. Master's Thesis. Michigan University of Michigan, 1986, 80p.
18. Wennberg A, Ørstavik D. Adhesion of root canal sealers to bovine dentine and gutta-percha. Int Endod J 1990: 23: 13-9.
19. White R.R., Goidman M., Lin P S. The influence of the smear iayer upon dentinal tubule penetration by endodontic filling materials. Part II. J Endod 1987: 13: 369-74.
20. Cruz-Fiiho A.M.. Sousa-Neto M.D., Saquy PC., Pécoru J.D. Evaluation of the effect of EDTAC, CDTA and EGTA on radicular dentin microhardness. J Endod 200 I; 27: 183-4. 2 I
21. BaumgartnerJ.C., Mader C.L. A scanning electron microscopic evaluation of four root canal irrigation regimens. J Endod 1987; 13: 147-57.
22. Ciucchi B., Khettabi M., HoizJ. The effectiveness of different endodontic irrigation procedures on the removal of the smear layer: a scanning electron microscopic study. Int Endod J 1989; 22: 21-8.
23. Cengiz T, Aktener B.O.. Piskin B. The effect of dentinal tubule orientation on the removal of smear layer by root canal irrigants. A scanning electron microscopic study. Int Endod J 1990; 23: 163-71.
24. Sousa-Neto M.D. Estudo da influêcia de diferentes tipos de breus e resinas hidrogenadas sobre as propriedades fisicoquimicas do cimento obturador dos canals radiculares do tipo Grossman. [Doctoral thesis]. Ribeirao Preto: Faculdade de Odontologia de Ribeirão Preto, Universidade de São Paulo, 1997: 108p.
25. Cawalho-Junior J.R. Estudo comparativo entre o cimento obturador à base de ionômero de vidro e diferentes cimentos obturadores dos canals radiculares, quanto às propriedades físico-químicas [Masters thesis]. Ribeirão Preto, Universidade de Ribeirão Preto, 2000: I55p.
26. Potts T, Petrou A. Laser photopolymerisation of dental materials with potential endodontic applications. J Endod 1990; 16: 265-8.
27. Timpawat S.,H arnirattisai C., Senawongs P Adhesion of a glassionomer root canal sealer to the root canal wall. J Endod 2001; 27: 168-71.
28. Chung H.A., Titiey K.. Torneck C.D., Lawrence H.P, Friedman S. Adhesion of glass-ionomer cement sealers to bovine dentin conditioned with intracanal medications. J Endod 2001; 27: 85-8.