Class and continuity in social reproduction: An empirical investigation

Sociological Review

Volumn 46, Issue 2, 1998, Pages 340-364

  Prandy, Kenneth ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0041135809     PISSN: 00380261     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/1467-954X.00122     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Blackburn, R. M. and Marsh, C., (1991), 'Education and Social Class: Revisiting the 1944 Education Act with Fixed Marginals'. British Journal of Sociology, 42: 507-36.
2. Blackburn, R. M. and Prandy, K., (1997), 'The reproduction of social inequality', Sociology 31 (3), 491-509.
3. Blau, P. M. and Duncan, O. D., (1967), The American Occupational Structure, New York: John Wiley.
4. Bourdieu, P., (1987), 'What makes a social class? On the theoretical and practical existence of groups', Berkeley Journal of Sociology, 32: 1-17.
5. Coleman, R. P. and Rainwater, L., (1979), Social Standing in America, London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
6. Erikson, R. and Goldthorpe, J. H., (1992), The Constant Flux, Oxford: Clarendon Press.
7. Evans, G. (1992), 'Testing the validity of the Goldthorpe class schema', European Sociological Review, 8: 211-232.
8. Evans, G., (1996), 'Putting men and women into classes: an assessment of the cross-sex validity of the Goldthorpe class schema'. Sociology, 30: 209-234.
9. Goldthorpe, J. H., (1980), Social Mobility and Class Structure in Modern Britain, Oxford: Oxford University press.
10. Goldthorpe, J. H. and Marshall, G., (1996), The promising future of class analysis'. in D. J. Lee and B. S. Turner (eds.), Conflicts About Class: Debating Inequality in Late Industrialism, London: Longman.
11. Marsh, C. and Blackburn, R. M., (1992), 'Class differences in access to higher education', in Burrows, R. and Marsh, C. (eds), Consumption and Class: Divisions and Change, London: Macmillan.
12. Pahl, R., (1996), 'A reply to Goldthorpe and Marshall', in D. J. Lee and B. S. Turner (eds), Conflicts About Class: Debating Inequality in Late Industrialism, London: Longman.
13. Prandy, K., (1990), 'The revised Cambridge scale of occupations'. Sociology, 24 (4), 629-55.
14. Prandy, K., (1996), 'Categories or quantities: class or hierarchy?', paper presented at the ISA Fourth International Social Science Methods Conference, University of Essex.
15. Prandy, K. and Blackburn, R. M., (1997), 'Putting men and women into classes: but is that where they belong? A comment on Evans', Sociology, 31 (1), 143-152.
16. Prandy, K. and Bottero, W., (1995), The social analysis of stratification and mobility. Cambridge: SRG Working Paper No. 18.
17. Prandy, K. and Bottero, W., (1998), 'The use of marriage data to measure the social order in nineteenth century Britain', Sociological Research Online, 3(1).
18. Roberts, H., (1993), 'The women and class debate', in D. Morgan and L. Stanley (eds), Debates in Sociology. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
19. Rose, D. and O'Reilly, K. (eds), (1997), Constructing Classes: towards a new social classification for the UK, Swindon: Economic and Social Research Council/Office for National Statistics.
20. Stewart, A. and Blackburn, R. M., (1975), The stability of structural inequality', Sociological Review, 23 (3), 481-508.
21. Stewart, A., Prandy, K. and Blackburn, R. M., (1980), Social Stratification and Occupations, London: Macmillan.