The worst of both worlds: Nursing home regulation in the United States

Review of Policy Research

Volumn 17, Issue 4, 2000, Pages 43-59

  Hovey, William ^a  

^a VIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE AND STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; GOVERNMENT; HISTORY; LAW; LEGAL ASPECT; MANPOWER; NURSING HOME; UNITED STATES;

FEDERAL GOVERNMENT; HISTORY, 20TH CENTURY; LEGISLATION, HOSPITAL; NURSING HOMES; STATE GOVERNMENT; UNITED STATES;

EID: 0041114127     PISSN: 1541132X     EISSN: 15411338     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1541-1338.2000.tb00956.x     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Abt Associates. 1998. Study of Private Accreditation (Deeming) of Nursing Homes, Regulatory Incentives and Non-Regulatory Incentives, and Effectiveness of the Survey and Certification System. Washington, D.C.: Report prepared for Congress on behalf of the U.S. Health Care Financing Administration.
2. Ayres, I. and J. Braithwaite. 1992. Responsive Regulation: Transcending the Deregulation Debate. New York: Oxford University Press.
3. Berwick, D.M., A.B. Godfrey, and J. Roessner. 1990. Curing Health Care: New Strategies for Quality Improvement. New York: Jossey Bass.
4. Bitstock, A. and W. Sector. 1997. “Five Priority Areas for Research in Long-Term Care. Health Services Research 32: 715–730.
5. Brennan, T. and D. Berwick. 1995. The New Rules: Regulation, Markets, and the Quality of American Health Care. New York: Jossey Bass.
6. CHPS Consulting. 1998. Study of Issues Regarding Medicaid Nursing Home Reimbursement. Columbia, MD: CHPS Consulting. Report Prepared for the Virginia Department of Medical Assistance Services pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 120 (1998).
7. Cotton, P. 1993. “Nursing Home Research Focus on Outcomes May Mean Playing Catch-Up With Regulation. Journal of the American Medical Association 269: 2337–2338.
8. Hawes, C. 1995. Statement. Washington, D.C.: Presented at a U.S. Senate Forum, The Impact of Proposals to Alter Medicaid on Long-Term Care.
9. Kingdon, J. 1995. Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies, Second Ed. New York: Harper Collins.
10. National Institute of Medicine, Committee on Nursing Home Regulation. 1986. Improving the Quality of Care in Nursing Homes. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.
11. O'Leary, D. 1998. Testimony to the Senate Select Committee on Aging. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Senate.
12. Rees, J. 1988. Reforming the Workplace: A Study of Self-Regulation in Occupational Safety. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
13. Rees, J. 1996. Hostages of Each Other: The Transformation of Nuclear Safety Since Three Mile Island. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
14. Schwellen, J.F. 1990. “Statistical Quality Control in Nursing Homes: Assessment and Management of Chronic Urinary Incontinence. Health Services Research 25: 628–637.
15. Shaughnessy, Peter, R.E. Schenkler, and A.M. Kramer. 1990. “Quality of Long-Term Care in Nursing Homes and Swing Bed Hospitals. Health Services Research 25: 65–95.
16. Stone, D. 1997. Policy Paradox: The Art of Political Decision Making. Second Ed. New York: W.W. Norton.
17. U.S. General Accounting Office. 1998. California Nursing Homes: Care Problems Persist Despite Federal and State Oversight. Washington, D.C.: HEHS 98–202.
18. U.S. General Accounting Office. 1999. Nursing Homes: Additional Steps Needed to Strengthen Enforcement of Federal Quality Standards. Washington, D.C.: HEHS 99–46.
19. White House, Office of the Press Secretary. 1998. Press Briefing by Secretary of Health and Human Services Donna Shalala and Health Care Financing Administrator Nancy Ann Deparle. Washington, D.C.: White House, July 21.