A confirmatory examination of walberg's model of educational productivity in student career aspiration

Educational Psychology

Volumn 21, Issue 4, 2001, Pages 443-453

  Ma, Xin ^a   Wang, Jianjun ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA   (Canada)

^b CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0041098732     PISSN: 01443410     EISSN: 14695820     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/01443410120090821     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Ball, G.G., and Goldman, S., 1997. Improving education's productivity: Reexamining the system to get the schools we need. Phi Delta Kappan, 79: 228–232.
2. Berliner, D., and Biddle, B., 1995. The manufactured crisis, New York: Addison-Wesley.
3. Bishop, J., 1996. “ Singling the competencies of high school students to employers ”. In Linking school and work, Edited by: Resnick, L., and Wirt, J., San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
4. Bracey, G.W., 1996. Schools should not prepare students for work. Rethinking Schools, 10(4): 11
5. Clery, S.B., Lee, J.B., Knapp, L.G., and Carroll, C.D., 1998. Gender differences in earnings among young adults entering the labor market, Washington DC: US Department of Education.
6. Cooper, H., Lindsay, J., Nye, B., and Greathouse, S., 1998. Relationships among attitudes about homework, amount of homework assigned and completed, and student achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90: 70–83.
7. Decker, P., 1997. Findings from education and the economy: An indicators report, Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
8. Hunt, J.B., 1997. The national education goals report: Summary, Washington, DC: National Education Goals Panel.
9. Ingels, S., Dowd, K.L., Baldridge, J.D., Stipe, J.L., Bartot, V.H., Frandle, M.R., and Quinn, P., 1994. Second follow-up: Student component data file user's manual, Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
10. Joreskog, K., and Sorbom, D., 1989. USREL 7: A guide to the program and applications, Chicago: SPSS.
11. Joreskog, K., and Sorbom, D., 1993. LISREL 8: User's reference guide, Chicago: Scientific Software International.
12. Leohlin, H.C., 1992. Latent variable models, 2nd edition, Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
13. Medrich, E., 1996. Preparation for work, Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
14. Murnane, R., and Levy, F., 1996. Teaching the new basics: Principles for educating children to thrive in a changing economy, New York: Free.
15. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. 1989. Curriculum and evaluation standards for school mathematics, Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
16. Redovich, D.W., 1998. Math, jobs, and the future. Phi Delta Kappan, 79: 719
17. Reynolds, A.J., and Walberg, H.J., 1991. A structural model of science achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83: 97–107.
18. Reynolds, A.J., and Walberg, H.J., 1992. A structural model of science achievement and attitude: An extension to high school. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84: 371–382.
19. Rock, D.A., Pollack, J.M., and Quinn, P., 1995. Psychometric report for the NELS:88 base year through second follow-up, Washington, DC: US Department of Education.
20. Snyder, T.D., Hoffman, C.M., and Geddes, C.M., 1996. Digest of education statistics 1996, Washington, DC: US Department of Education.
21. Tyler, R.W., 1984. A guide to educational trouble-shooting. Educational Leadership, 41(8): 27–30.
22. Walberg, H., 1981. “ A psychological theory of educational productivity ”. In Psychology and education, Edited by: Parley, F. H., and Gorden, N., 81–108. Berkerley: McCutchan.
23. Walberg, H., 1986. “ Synthesis of research on teaching ”. In Handbook of research on teaching, Edited by: Wittrock, M. C., 214–229. Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
24. Wilson, J.W., 1996. When work disappears, New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
25. Young, D., Reynolds, A., and Walberg, H., 1996. Science achievement and educational productivity: a hierarchical linear model. Journal of Educational Research, 89: 272–287.