Association of parameters of crossbreeding effect for traits of growth and meat-production with average band-sharing of RAPD markers in commercial crosses of Duroc, Landrace and Large White pigs

Acta Genetica Sinica

Volumn 28, Issue 8, 2001, Pages 727-729

  Shi, Qi Shun ^a   Liu, Xiao Chun ^a   Wu, Xiao Lin ^a,b  

^a HUNAN AGRICULTURAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b Hunan Institute of Animal and Veterinary Science   (China)

Author keywords

Growth; Heterosis; Meat production; Parameters of crossbreeding effect; RAPD

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BREEDING; CROSS BREEDING; GENETICS; GROWTH; RANDOM AMPLIFIED POLYMORPHIC DNA; SWINE;

ANIMALS; BREEDING; CROSSES, GENETIC; GROWTH; RANDOM AMPLIFIED POLYMORPHIC DNA TECHNIQUE; SWINE;

EID: 0041075194     PISSN: 03794172     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Dickerson G E. Experimental approaches in utilizing breed resources. Anim. Breed. Abstr., 1969, 37:1991-1997.
2. Dickerson G E. Inbreeding and heterosis in animals. In: Proc. Anim. Breed. Genet. Symp. Champaign, 1973, 54-57.
3. Ahlschwede W T, O W Robison. Prenatal and postnatal influences on growth and backfat in swine. J. Anim. Sci., 1971, 32:10-22.
4. Ahlschwede W T, O W. Robison, Maternal effects on weight and backfat of swine. J. Anim. Sci., 1971, 33:1206-1219.
5. Steward T C, C R Long, T C Cartwright. Characterizaion of cattle of a five-breed diallel. III. Puberty in bulls and heifers. J. Anim. Sci., 1980, 50:808-814.
6. Jungst S B, D L Kunlers. Estimates of additive genetic, maternal and specific combining abilities for some litter traits of swine. J. Anim. Sci., 1984, 59:1140-1148.
7. McLaren D G, D S Buchanan, R K Johnson. Individual heterosis and breed effects for postweaning performance and carcass traits in four breeds of swine. J. Anim. Sci., 1987, 64:83-98.
8. McLaren D G, D S Buchanan, J E Williams. Growth performance for four breeds of swine: crossbred females and crossbred boars. J. Anim. Sci., 1987, 64:99-108.
9. Hillel J, E A Dunnington P B Sigel. DNA markers in poultry breeding and genetic analyses. Poult. Sci. Rev., 1992, 4:169-186.
10. Haberfeld A, E A Dunnington, P B. Siegel. Genetic distance estimated from DNA fingerprint in crosses of white plymouth Rock chickens. Anim. Genet., 1992, 23:167-173.
11. Haberfeld A, E A Dunnington, P B Siegel, J Hillel. Heterosis and DNA finger-printing in chickens. Poultry Sci., 1996, 75:951-953.
12. Bernardo R. Relationship between single cross performance and molecular marker heterozygosity. Thero. Appl. Genet., 1992, 83:628-634.
13. Williams J G K, A R Kubelik, K J Livak, J A Rafalski, S V Tingey. DNA polymorphisms amplified by arbitrary primers are useful genetic markers. Nucleic Acids Res., 1990. 18:6531-6535.
14. Smith E J, C P Jones, J Bartlett, K E Nestor. Use of randomly amplified polymorphic DNA markers for the genetic analysis of relatedness and diversity in chickens and turkeys. Poultry Sci., 1996, 75:579-584.
15. Levin I, L B Crittenden, J B Dodgson. Genetic map of the chicken Z chromosome using Random Amplified Polymorphic DNA (RAPD) markers. Genomics, 1993, 16:224-230.
16. Liu X C, X L Wu, R Z Liu, B N Xiao, Q S Shi, Q J Xiao, J Jiang. Predicting heterosis through biochemical and RAPD markers in animal species. Anim. Biotech. Bull., 1998, 6:77-82.
17. Sambrook J E F Freitsch, T Maniatis. Molecular Cloning. Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, NY, 1989.
18. Lynch M. The similarity index and DNA fingerprinting. Mol. Biol. Evol., 1990. 7:478-484.
19. SAS Institute Inc. In: SAS / STAT User's Guide, Version 6, 4th Edition, Volume 1, Cary, NC, USA, 1990, 891-996.
20. Young L D, R K Johnson, I T Omtvedt, L E Walters. Post weaning performance and carcass merit of purebred and two-breed cross pigs. J. Anim. Sci., 1976, 42:1124-1132.
21. Johnson R K. Heterosis and breeds in swine. North Central Regional Pub., 1980, 262-295.
22. Johnson R K. Crossbreeding in swine: experimental results. J. Anim. Sci., 1981, 52:906-923.
23. Wheat J D, T J T Yu, T C Chou, K E Kemp, R R. Schalles. Using diallel mating to estimate combining abilities and maternal effects in swine. J. Anim. Sci., 1981, 53:629-642.
24. Bereskin B, C E Shelby, L N Hazel. Carcass traits of purebred Duroc and Yorkshires and their crosses. J. Anim. Sci., 1971, 32:413-420.
25. Kuhlers D L A B Champman, N L First. Estimation of genotype-enviroment interactions in production and carcass trait. J. Anim. Sci., 1972, 35:1-7.
26. Kuhlers D L, A B Champman, N L First. Estimation of genotype-enviroment interactions between two breeds of swine for production and carcass traits. J. Anim. Sci., 1977, 44:549-561.
27. Scheider J. Individual and maternal heterosis estimated from single crosses and backcrosses of swine. Ph. D. Thesis. Iowa State Univ. Ames., 1978.
28. Wu X L, X Li, Q S Shi. Relationship of hybrid performance with parental difference and hybrid heterozygosity in non-inbred populations. Anim. Biotech. Bull., 1998, 6:127-132.