Development of a national survey of teacher education program graduates

Journal of Educational Research

Volumn 93, Issue 2, 1999, Pages 76-89

  Loadman, William E ^a   Rahman, Mohammed A ^a   Freeman, Donald J ^b   Brookhart, Susan M ^c   McCague, Girard J ^c  

^a OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c DUQUESNE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0041072134     PISSN: 00220671     EISSN: 19400675     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00220679909597632     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Andrew, M. D, (1990). Differences between graduates of 4-year and 5-year teacher education programs. Journal of Teacher Education, 41(2), 41-51
2. Andrew, M. D. (1997, February). Selected results-benchmark project, 1990-1995. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Association of Colleges of Teacher Education, Phoenix, AZ
3. Armstrong, D. (1991, February). Extended teacher-preparation programs: What the literature tells us. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Association of Teacher Educators, New Orleans. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 336 345)
4. Ayers, J. B. (1988). Teacher education follow-up evaluation: How to do it. In W. J. Gephart & J. B. Ayers (Eds.)., Teacher education evaluation (pp. 85-111). Boston; Kluwer
5. Baker, T., & Andrew, M. D. (1993, February). An eleven-institution study of four-year and five-year teacher education program graduates. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Association of Teacher Educators, Los Angeles. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 355 224)
6. Brookhart, S. M., & Freeman, D J. (1992). Characteristics of entering teacher candidates. Review of Educational Research, 62, 37-60
7. Brookhart, S. M., Freeman, D. J., Loadman, W. E., & Rahman, M. A. (1997, February). Feedback from recent program graduates: A sense of direction for leaders in teacher education. Paper presented at the annual conference of the American Association of Colleges of Teacher Education, Phoenix, AZ
8. Brookhart, S. M., Loadman, W. E., & Freeman, D. J. (1989, June). National Survey of Teacher Education Graduates: Survey instrument content review. Unpublished paper, The Ohio State University
9. Craig, J. R. (1989). Follow-up evaluation of teacher education programs. In J. B. Ayers & M. F. Bemey (Eds.), A practical guide to teacher education evaluation (pp. 131-150). Boston: Kluwer
10. Delaney, A. M. (1995, April). Promoting responsive teacher education through effective follow-up studies. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 388 659)
11. Drummond, R. J. (1991). Beginning teachers: What they have to say about their performance and preparation. Jacksonville: University of North Florida
12. Freeman, D. J. (1988). Compendium of items for follow-up surveys of teacher education programs (Technical Series 88-1). East Lansing: Michigan State University, National Center for Research on Teacher Education
13. Holste, D., & Matthews, D. (1993). Survey of 1991 teacher education graduates conducted in May 1992. Champaign, IL: Council on Teacher Education. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 364 535)
14. Katz, L., Raths, J., Mohanty, C., Kurachi, A., & Irving, J. (1981). Followup studies: Are they worth the trouble? Journal of Teacher Education, 32(2), 18-27
15. Kochman, B. J. (1995, April). The change in teachers perceptions over time. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 390 830)
16. Lewis, M., & Kraus, L. (1989). Teaching competencies of students completing traditional and certification-only teacher education programs. Teacher Education and Practice, 5(2), 15-20
17. Loadman, W. E. (1989). Developing a national database for pre-service teacher education follow-up studies. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Association of Colleges of Teacher Education, Anaheim, CA
18. Loadman, W. E., Brookhart, S. M., & Freeman, D. J. (1990, May). Development and results of a multi-institutional follow-up study of teacher education graduates. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Canadian Evaluation Society, Toronto
19. McEneaney, J., & Sheridan, E. (1993). Evaluating the effectiveness of an undergraduate teacher education program. South Bend, IN. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 176 989)
20. National Council for Accreditation of Teacher Education. (1987). NCATE standards, procedures, and policies for the accreditation of professional education units. Washington, DC
21. Pike, G. R. (1993). The relationship between perceived learning and satisfaction with college: An alternative view. Research in Higher Education, 34(4), 23-40
22. Rancifer, J. L. (1992, November). Defining teacher education by recognizing what students expect from educational experiences. Paper presented at the annual conference of the Southeastern Regional Association of Teacher Educators, Jackson, MS. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 350 267)
23. Wesley, D A., & Vocke, D. E. (1992, February). Classroom discipline and teacher education. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Association of Teacher Educators, Orlando, FL. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 341 690)
24. West, B. (1987), Research and evaluation in teacher education: Follow-up study of Michigan State University teacher education graduates (Program Evaluation Series No. 19). East Lansing: Michigan State University
25. White, J. (1986). Levels of concern of five-year program graduates. Unpublished report. Sherman, TX: Austin College