Nonvirtue is not apathy: Warrants for discourse and citizen dissent

American Review of Public Administration

Volumn 30, Issue 3, 2000, Pages 225-251

  Patterson, Patricia M ^a  

^a FLORIDA ATLANTIC UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0041036170     PISSN: 02750740     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/02750740022064650     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Ackelsberg, M. (1988). Communities, resistance, and women's activism. In A. Bookman & S. Morgen (Eds.), Women and the politics of empowerment (pp. 297-313). Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
2. Bachrach, P., & Baratz, M. S. (1970). Power and poverty: Theory and practice. New York: Oxford University Press.
3. Burrell, G. (1996). Normal science paradigms, metaphors, discourses, and genealogies of analysis. In S. Clegg, C. Hardy, & W. Nord (Eds.), Handbook of organization studies (pp. 642-658). London: Sage.
4. Ciuilla, J. (1996). Leadership and the problem of bogus empowerment. Ethics and leadership: Working papers (pp. 43-63). College Park: Kellogg Leadership Studies Project.
5. DeMott, B. (1996, December 9). Seduced by civility: Political manners and the crisis of democratic values. The Nation, 263(19), 11-19.
6. Elshtain, J. B. (1981). Public man, private woman. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
7. Farmer, D. J. (1995). The language of public administration: Bureaucracy, modernity, and postmodernity. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press.
8. Fischer, F. (1990). Technocracy and the politics of expertise. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
9. Forester, J. (1983). Critical theory and organizational analysis. In G. Morgan (Ed.), Beyond method: Strategies for social research (pp. 234-246). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
10. Forester, J. (1989). Planning in the face of power. Berkeley: University of California Press.
11. Fox, C. J., & Miller, H. T. (1996). Postmodern public administration: Toward discourse. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
12. Fraser, N. (1989). What's critical about critical theory? The case of Habermas and gender. Unruly practices: Power, discourse and gender in contemporary social theory (pp. 113-143). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
13. Fraser, N. (1992). Rethinking the public sphere: A contribution to the critique of actually existing democracy. In C. Calhoun (Ed.), Habermas and the public sphere (pp. 109-142). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
14. Frederickson, G. (1991). Toward a theory of the public for public administration. Administration & Society, 22(4), 395-417.
15. Galanter, M. (1975). Why the haves come out ahead: Speculations on the limits of legal change. Law and Society Review, 9(1), 95-160.
16. Gaventa, J. (1980). Power and powerlessness: Quiescence and rebellion in an Appalachian valley. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
17. Gutmann, A., & Thompson, D. (1995). Moral disagreement in a democracy. Social Philosophy and Policy, 12(1), 87-110.
18. Gutmann, A., & Thompson, D. (1996). Democracy and disagreement. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
19. Gutmann, A., & Thompson, D. (1998). Deliberative democracy: The case of bioethics. Liberal Education, 84(1), 10-17.
20. Habermas, J. (1983). The theory of communicative action. Boston: Beacon Press.
21. Hickey, D. (1997). Air guitar: Essays on art and democracy. Los Angeles: Art Issues Press.
22. Hirschman, A. O. (1970). Exit, voice, and loyalty. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
23. Honig, B. (1993). Political theory and the displacement of politics. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
24. Ivy, D., & Backlund, P. (1994). Exploring genderspeak. New York: McGraw Hill.
25. Jones, K. B. (1988). On authority: Or, why women are not entitled to speak. In I. Diamond & L. Quinby (Eds.), Feminism and Foucault: Reflections on resistance (pp. 119-133). Boston: Northeastern University Press.
26. Junn, J. (1997). Assimilating or coloring participation? Gender, race, and democratic participation. In C. J. Cohen, K. B. Jones, & J. C. Tronto (Eds.), Women transforming politics (pp. 387-397). New York: New York University Press.
27. Lakoff, R. (1975). Language and woman's place. New York: Harper and Row.
28. Landes, J. B. (1995). The public and the private sphere: A feminist reconsideration. In J. Meehan (Ed.), Feminists read Habermas: Gendering the subject of discourse (pp. 91-116). New York: Routledge.
29. Lukes, S. (1974). Power: A radical view. London: Macmillan.
30. Mansbridge, J. (1996). Reconstructing democracy. In N. J. Hirschmann & C. Di Stefano (Eds.), Revisioning the political: Feminist Reconstructions of traditional concepts in western political theory (pp. 117-138). Boulder, CO: Westview.
31. McCarthy, T. (1978). The critical theory of Jurgen Habermas. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
32. McCarthy, T. (1983). Translator's introduction. In J. Habermas (Ed.), The theory of communicative action (pp. vii-xxxix). Boston: Beacon Press.
33. McSwite, O. C. (1997). Legitimacy in public administration: A discourse analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
34. Minow, M. (1997). Not only for myself: Identity, politics and the law. New York: New Press.
35. Newton, K. (1997). Social capital and democracy. American Behavioral Scientist, 40(5), 575-586.
36. Putnam, L., Phillips, N., & Chapman, P. (1996). Metaphors of communication and organization. In S. Clegg, C. Hardy, & W. Nord (Eds.), Handbook of organization studies (pp. 375-408). London: Sage.
37. Scott, J. C. (1990). Domination and the arts of resistance: Hidden transcripts. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
38. Stivers, C. (1994). The listening bureaucrat: Responsiveness in public administration. Public Administration Review, 54(4), 86-105.
39. Stone, D. (1997). Policy paradox: The art of political decision making. New York: Norton.
40. White, O. (1998). The ideology of technocratic empiricism and the discourse movement in contemporary public administration: A clarification. Administration & Society, 30(4), 471-476.
41. Young, I. M. (1987). Impartiality and the civic public: Some implications of feminist critiques of moral and political theory. In S. Benhabib & D. Cornell (Eds.), Feminism as critique (pp. 56-76). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
42. Young, I. M. (1997). Communication and the other: Beyond deliberative democracy. Intersecting voices: Dilemmas of gender, political philosophy, and policy (pp. 60-74). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
43. Young, I. M. (1998, September 5). Inclusive political communication. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Boston, MA.