Definition x treatment interactions for students with learning disabilities

School Psychology Review

Volumn 28, Issue 4, 1999, Pages 644-658

  Swanson, H Lee ^a   Hoskyn, Maureen ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0041031969     PISSN: 02796015     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Bollen, K. A. (1989). Structural equations with latent variables. New York: Wiley-Interscience.
2. Borkowski, J. G., & Turner, L. A. (1990). Transsituational characteristics of metacognition. In W. Schneider & F. E. Weinert (Eds.), Interactions among aptitudes, strategies, and knowledge in cognitive performance (pp. 159-176). New York: Springer-Verlag.
3. Brinker, R. P. (1990). In search of the foundation of special education: Who are the individuals and what are the differences? Journal of Special Education, 24, 174-184.
4. Brophy, J. E. (1988). Research linking teacher behavior to student achievement: Potential implications for instruction of Chapter 1 students. In B. I. Williams, P. A. Richmond, & B. J. Mason (Eds.), Designs for compensatory education: Conference proceedings and papers (pp. 122-179 IV). Washington, DC: Research and Evaluation Associations.
5. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.) New York: Academic Press.
6. Cronbach, L. J., & Snow, R. E. (1977). Aptitudes and instructional methods: A handbook for research on interactions. New York: Irvington.
7. Engelmann, S., & Carnine, D. W. (1982). Theory of instruction: Principles and applications. New York: Irvington.
8. Fletcher, J., Shaywitz, S. E., Shankweiler, D. P., Katz, L., Liberman, I., Stuebing, K., Francis, D., Fowler, A., & Shaywitz, B. A. (1994). Cognitive profiles of reading disability: Comparisons of discrepancy and low achievement definitions. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86, 6-23.
9. Fuchs, D., Mathes, P., Fuchs, L., & Lipsey, M. (in preparation). A comparison between discrepancy and nondiscrepancy groups.
10. Gleser, L. J., & Olkin, I. (1994). Stochastically dependent effect sizes. In H. Cooper & L. V. Hedges (Eds.), The handbook of research synthesis (pp. 339-355). New York: Sage.
11. Graham, S., & Harris, K. R. (1996). Self-regulation and strategy instruction for students who find writing and learning challenging. In C. M. Levy & S. Ransdell (Eds.), The science of writing: Theories, methods, individual differences, and applications (pp. 347-360). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
12. Hedges, L. V., & Olkin, I. (1985). Statistical methods for meta-analysis. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
13. Hunter, J. E., & Schmidt, F. L. (1990). Methods of meta-analysis: Correcting error and bias in research findings. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
14. Kameenui, E. J., Jitendra, A. K., & Darch, C. B. (1995). Direct instruction reading as contronym and eonomine. Reading & Writing Quarterly: Overcoming Learning Difficulties, 11(1), 3-17.
15. Levin, J. R. (1986). Four cognitive principles of learning strategy instruction. Educational Psychologist, 21, 3-17.
16. Lovett, M. W., Borden, S. L., DeLuca, T., Lacerenza, L., Benson, N. J., & Brackstone, D. (1994). Treating the core deficits of developmental dyslexia: Evidence of transfer of learning after phonologically- and strategy-based reading training programs. Developmental Psychology, 30, 805-822.
17. Mercer, C. D., Jordan, L., Allsopp, D. H., & Mercer, A. R. (1996). Learning disabilities definitions and criteria used by stated education departments. Learning Disability Quarterly, 19, 217-232.
18. Morrison, S. R., & Siegel, L. S. (1991). Learning disabilities: A critical review of definitional and assessment issues. In J. E. Obrzut & G. W. Hynd (Eds.), Neurological foundations of learning disabilities (pp. 79-97). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
19. Pressley, M., & Ghatala, E. S. (1990). Self-regulated learning: Monitoring learning from text. Educational Psychologist, 25, 19-34.
20. Rosenshine, B. (1995). Advances in research on instruction. Journal of Educational Research, 88(5), 262-268.
21. Rosenthal, R. (1994). Parametric measures of effect size. In H. Cooper & L. V. Hedges (Eds.), The handbook of research synthesis (pp. 231-244). New York: Sage.
22. Siegel, L. S. (1992). An evaluation of the discrepancy definition of dyslexia. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 25, 618-629.
23. Siegel, L. S., & Ryan, E. B. (1989). The development of working memory in normally achieving and subtypes of learning disabled children. Child Development, 60, 973-980.
24. Slavin, R. E. (1987). Grouping for instruction in the elementary school. Educational Psychologist, 22, 109-127.
25. Smith, M. L., Glass, G. V., & Miller, C. K. (1980). The benefits of psychotherapy. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
26. Snow, R. E. (1994). Abilities in academic tasks. In R. J. Sternberg & R. K. Wagner (Eds.), Mind in context: Interactionist perspective on human intelligence (pp. 3-37). New York: Cambridge University Press.
27. Snow, R. E., & Swanson, J. (1992). Instructional psychology: Aptitude, adaptation, and assessment. Annual Review of Psychology, 43, 583-626.
28. Stanovich, K. E., & Siegel, L. S. (1994). Phenotypic performance profile of children with reading disabilities: A regression based test of the phonological-core difference model. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86, 24-53.
29. Swanson, H. L. (1999). Instructional components that predict treatment outcomes for students with learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 14, 129-140.
30. Swanson, H. L. (1991). Operational definitions of learning disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 14, 242-254.
31. Swanson, H. L., Carson, C., & Sachse-Lee, C. M. (1996). A selective synthesis of intervention research for students with learning disabilities. School Psychology Review, 25(3), 370-391.
32. Swanson, H. L., & Hoskyn, M. (1998). A synthesis of experimental intervention literature for students with learning disabilities: A meta-analysis of treatment outcomes. Review of Educational Research, 68, 277-321.
33. Swanson, H. L., Hoskyn, M., Sachse-Lee, C. M., & O'Shaughnessy, T. (1997). A comprehensive synthesis of intervention research in the field of learning disabilities: A meta-analysis of treatment outcomes. Report submitted to the U.S. Dept. Of Education, October, 15, 1997.
34. Tobias, S. (1981). Adaptation to individual differences. In F. H. Farley & N. J. Gordon, (Eds.), Psychology and education: The state of the union (pp. 40-81). Berkeley, CA: McCutchan.
35. Weisz, J. R., Weiss, B., Han, S. S., Granger, D. A., & Morton, T. (1995). Effects of psychotherapy with children and adolescents revisited: A meta-analysis of treatment outcome studies. Psychological Bulletin, 117(3), 450-468.