A nationwide register for quality assessment in intensive care;Vorschlag für ein nationales register zum externen qualitätsvergleich in der intensivmedizin: Interdisziplinäre arbeitsgruppe "qualitätssicherung in der intensivmedizin" der Deutschen Interdisziplinären Vereinigung für Intensivmedizin (DIVI)

Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin

Volumn 37, Issue 5, 2000, Pages 454-460

  Waydhas, C ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL ESSEN   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0041028594     PISSN: 01753851     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s003900070059     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Arbeitsgemeinschaft Scoring der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Unfallchirurgie (1994) Das Traumaregister der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Unfallchirurgie [Trauma registry of the German society of trauma surgery]. Unfallchirurg 97: 230-237
2. Frutiger A, Moreno R, Thijs L, Carlet J (1998) A clinician's guide to the use of quality terminology. Working group on quality improvement of the european society of intensive care medicine. Intensive Care Med 24:860-863
3. Goris RJ, te Boekhorst TP, Nuytinck JK, Gimbrere JS (1985) Multiple-organ failure. Generalized autodestructive inflammation? Arch Surg 120:1109-1115
4. Gunning K, Rowan K (1999) Outcome data and scoring systems. BMJ 319:241-244
5. Jacobs S, Chnag R, Lee B, B L (1988) Audit of intensive care: a 30 month experience using the Apache II severity of disease classification system. Intensive Care Med 14:567-574
6. Jacobs S, Zuleika M, Mphansa T (1999) The multiple organ dysfunctionscore as a descriptor of patient outcome in septic shock compared with two other scoring systems. Crit Care Med 27:741-744
7. Knaus W, Draper E, Wagner D, Zimmermann J (1985) APACHE II: a severity of disease classification system. Crit Care Med 13:1818-1829
8. Lefering R, Dicke S, Bottcher B, Neugebauer E (1997) APACHE II score and prognosis of intensive care patients -r results of a quality assurance study of 939 patients. Langenbecks Arch Chir 114 (Suppl):1387-1389
9. LeGall J, Lemeshow S, Saulnier F (1993) A new simplified acute physiology score (SAPS II) based on a European/North American multicenter study. JAMA 270:2957-2963
10. Markgraf R, Deutschinoff G, Pientka L, Scholten T (2000) Comparison of acute physiology and chronic health evaluations II and II and simplified acute physiology score II: a prospective cohort study evaluaring these methods to predict outcome in a German interdisciplinary intensive care unit. Crit Care Med 28:26-33
11. Marshall J (1999) Charting the course of critical illness: prognostication and outcome description in the intensive care unit (editorial). Crit Care Med 27: 676-677
12. Marshall JC, Cook DJ, Christou NV, Bernard GR, Sprung CL, Sibbald WJ (1995) Multiple organ dysfunction score: a reliable descriptor of a complex clinical outcome [see comments]. Crit Care Med 23:1638-1652
13. Metnitz P, Vesely H, Valentin A, Popow C, Hiesmayr M, Lenz K, Krenn C, Stetzer H (1999) Evaluation of an interdisciplinary data set for national intensive care unit assessment. Crit Care Med 27: 1486-1491
14. Miranda DR, de Rijk A, Schaufeli W (1996) Simplified Therapeutic Intervention Scoring System: the TISS-28 items - results from a multicenter study. Crit Care Med 24:64-73
15. Rowan K, Kerr J, Major E, McPherson K, Short A, Vessey M (1993) Intensive care society's APACHE II study in Britain and Ireland I: variations in case mix of adult admissions to general intensive care units and impact on outcome. BMJ 307:972-977
16. Rowan K, Kerr J, Major E, McPherson K, Short A, Vessey M (1993) Intensive care society's APACHE II study in Britain and Ireland II: outcome comparisons of intensive care units after adjustment for case mix by the Amerivan APACHE II method. BMJ 307:977-981
17. Rowan K, Kerr J, Major E, McPherson K, Short A, Vessey M (1994) Intensive care society's APACHE II study in Britain and Ireland II: a prospective, multicenter, cohort study comparing two methods for predicting outcome for adult intensive care patients. Crit Care Med 22:1392-1401
18. Ruchholtz S (2000) The Trauma Registry of the German Society of Trauma Surgery as a basis for interclinical quality mangement. A multicenter study of the German Society of Trauma Surgery. Unfallchirurg 103:30-37
19. Thijs L (1997) Continuous quality improvement in the ICU: general guidelines. Task force European society if intensive care medicine. Intensive Care Med 23:125-126
20. Thijs L, Strack van Schijndel R (1996) Continuous quality improvement in the ICU and the role of a data managemnt system. Schweiz Med Wochenschr 126: 1631-1634
21. Vincent JL, de Mendonca A, Cantraine F, Moreno R, Takala J, Suter PM, Sprung CL, Colardyn F, Blecher S (1998) Use of the SOFA score to assess the incidence of organ dysfunction/failure in intensive care units: results of a multicenter, prospective study. Working group on sepsis-related problems of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine. Crit Care Med 26:1793-1800
22. Vincent JL, Moreno R, Takala J, Willatts S, De Mendonca A, Bruining H, Reinhart CK, Suter PM, Thijs LG (1996) The SOFA (Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment) score to describe organ dysfunction/failure. On behalf of the Working Group on Sepsis-Related Problems of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine. Intensive Care Med 22:707-710
23. Weiler T, Schmitz J, Baldering H, Heinrichs W (1998) Entwicklung des Kerndatensatzes. Anästh Intensivmed 39: 316-326
24. Weiler T, Schmitz J, Baldering H, Heinrichs W (1998) Qualitätssicherung in der Intensivmedizin: Definition der Inhalte des Kerndatensatzes Intensivmedizin. Anästh Intensivmed 39:575-580