Combining the advantages of one-sided and two-sided procedures for comparing several treatments with a control

Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference

Volumn 86, Issue 1, 2000, Pages 81-99

  Hayter, A J ^a   Miwa, Tetsuhisa ^b   Liu, Wei ^c  

^a Georgia Institute of Technology   (United States)

^b Natl Inst Environ S   (Japan)

^c UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHAMPTON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

62F25; 62F30; 62J10; 62J15; 62K99; Acceptance sets; Comparisons with a control; Critical points; Directional decisions; Orthogonal contrasts; Simultaneous confidence intervals

Indexed keywords

EID: 0041000572     PISSN: 03783758     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/s0378-3758(99)00161-5     Document Type: Article

References (9)

1. Bechhofer, R.E., Dunnett, C.W., 1988. Percentage points of multivariate student t distributions. Selected Tables in Mathematical Statistics, Vol. 11. American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI.
2. Dunnett C.W. A multiple comparison procedure for comparing several treatments with a control. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 50:1955;1096-1121.
3. Hayter A.J., Hsu J.C. On the relationship between stepwise decision procedures and confidence sets. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 89. 425:1994;128-136.
4. Hochberg, Y., Tamhane, A.C., 1987. Multiple Comparisons Procedures. Wiley, New York.
5. Hsu, J.C., 1996. Multiple Comparisons: Theory and Methods. Chapman & Hall, London.
6. Miller, R.G., 1981. Simultaneous Statistical Inference, 2nd Edition. Springer, Heidelberg and Berlin.
7. Miwa T., Hayter A.J. Combining the advantages of one-sided and two-sided test procedures for comparing several treatment effects. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 94. 445:1999;302-307.
8. Steel, R.G.D., Torrie, J.H., 1980. Principles and Procedures of Statistics: A Biometrical Approach, 2nd Edition. McGraw-Hill, New York.
9. Stefansson, G., Kim, W.C., Hsu, J.C., 1988. On confidence sets in multiple comparisons. Statist. Decision Theory Related Topics IV (2) 89-104.