Modifiability: A dynamic approach to assessing immediate language change

Communication Disorders Quarterly

Volumn 19, Issue 2, 1998, Pages 31-42

  Gutierrez Clellen, Vera F ^a   Conboy, Barbara ^a   Brown, Sandra ^b   Robinson Zañartu, Carol ^a  

^a SAN DIEGO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Private Practice ^*

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0040993750     PISSN: 15257401     EISSN: 15384837     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/152574019801900204     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Bachman,L.F. (1990). Fundamental considerations in language testing. (pp. 170-183). Oxford University Press.
2. Bain,B.A. & Olswang, L.B. (1995). Examining readiness for learning two-word utterances by children with specific expressive language impairment: Dynamic assessment validation. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 4, 81-91.
3. Bernstein, B. L. (1989). Assessing children with limited English proficiency: Current perspectives. Topics in Language Disorders, 9, 15-20.
4. Billingsley,F., White, O., & Munson, R. (1980). Procedural reliability: A rationale and an example. Behavioral Assessment, 2, 229-241.
5. Budoff,M., & Friedman, M. (1964). "Learning potential" as an assessment approach to the adolescent mentally retarded. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 28, 434-439.
6. Burt,M., Dulay, H., & Hernandez-Chavez, E. (1984). Bilingual Syntax Measure. San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.
7. Campione, J. C., & Brown, A. L. (1987). Linking dynamic assessment with school achievement. In C. S. Lidz (Ed.), Dynamic assessment: An interactional approach to evaluating learning potential (pp. 82-116). New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
8. Campione, J. C., Brown, A. L., Ferrara, R.A., Jones, R.S., & Steinberg, E. (1985). Differences between retarded and non-retarded children in transfer following equivalent learning performance: Breakdowns in flexible use of information. Intelligence, 9, 297-315.
9. Cole,K.N., Dale, P.S., & Mills, P.E. (1991). Individual differences in language delayed children's responses to direct and interactive preschool instruction. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 11, (1), 99-124.
10. Cole,K.N., Dale, P.S., Mills, P.E., & Jenkins, J.R. (1993). Interaction between early intervention curricula and student characteristics. Exceptional Children, 59, (6), 1-12.
11. Cole,K.N., Mills, P.E., & Dale, P. (1989). A comparison of the effects of academic and cognitive curricula for young handicapped children one and two years post-program. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 9, (3), 110-127.
12. Dale,P.S. & Cole, K.N. (1988). Academically based and cognitively based programs for young handicapped children: A comparative evaluation. Exceptional Children, 54, 439-447.
13. Dalton, E. F. (1991). Idea Oral Language Proficiency Test. Brea, CA: Ballard and Tighe.
14. Damico, J. S. (1991). Descriptive assessment of communicative ability in limited English proficient students. In E. V. Hamayan & J. S. Damico (Eds.), Limiting bias in the assessment of bilingual students (pp. 157-217). Austin, TX: Pro-ed.
15. De Avila, E.A., & Duncan, S. E. (1983). Language Assessment Scales. Monterey, CA: Publishers Test Service.
16. Embretson,S.E. (1987). Toward development of a psychometric approach. In C. S. Lidz (Ed.), Dynamic assessment: An interactional approach to evaluating learning potential (pp. 141-172). New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
17. Feuerstein, R. (1979). The dynamic assessment of retarded performers. Baltimore, MD: University Park Press.
18. Feuerstein, R. (1980). Instrumental enrichment: An intervention program for cognitive modifiability. Glenview, IL: Scott Foresman and Company.
19. Figueroa,R., Fradd, S. H., & Correa, V. I. (1989). Bilingual special education and this issue. Exceptional Children, 56, 145-152.
20. Figueroa, R. A., & García, E. (1994). Issues in testing students from culturally and linguistically diverse backgrounds. Multicultural Education, Fall, 10-19.
21. Gardner, M. F. (1990). Expressive one-word picture vocabulary test. Novato, CA: Academic Therapy.
22. Gerber, A. (1993). Language related learning disabilities: Their nature and treatment. Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brooks.
23. Gutierrez-Clellen, V.F. (1996) Language Diversity: Implications for Assessment. In K. Cole, P. Dale, & D. Thal (Eds.), Advances in assessment of communication and language (pp. 29-56). Baltimore, MD: Brookes Publishing.
24. Haywood, H. C., Brown, A.L., & Wingenfeld, S. (1990). Dynamic approaches to psychoeducational assessment. School Psychology Review, 19, 4, 411-422.
25. Jensen,M., Robinson-Zañartu, C., & Jensen, M. L. (1992). Dynamic assessment and mediated learning: Assessment and intervention for developing cognitive and knowledge structures (Monograph). Atlanta: Delphi Health & Sciences.
26. Lidz, C. S. (1987). Dynamic assessment: An interactional approach to evaluating learning potential. New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
27. Lidz, C. S. (1991). Practitioner's guide to dynamic assessment. New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
28. McNeill, D. (1966). A study of word association. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 5, 548-557.
29. Okagaki,L. & Sternberg, R.J. (1991). Cultural and parental influences on cognitive development. In L. Okagaki & R.J. Sternberg (Eds.) Directors of development: Influences on the development of children's thinking (pp. 101-120), Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
30. Olswang,L. & Bain, B. (1996). Assessment information for predicting upcoming change in language production. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 39, 2, 414-423.
31. Olswang,L., Bain, B., & Johnson, G. (1992). Using dynamic assessment with children with language disorders. In: S.F. Warren & J. Reichle (Eds.) Causes and effects in communication language intervention. Communication and language intervention series (pp. 187-215), Baltimore, MD: Brookes Publishing.
32. Olswang,L., Bain, B., Rosendahl, P., Oblak, S., & Smith, A. (1986). Language learning: Moving performance from a context-dependent to -independent state. Child Language and Teaching Therapy, 2, 180-210.
33. Peña, E. (1996). Dynamic assessment: The model and its language applications. In K. Cole, P. Dale, & D. Thal (Eds.) Advances in Assessment of Communication and Language (pp. 281-308). Baltimore: MD: Brookes Publishing.
34. Peña, E. (1993). Dynamic assessment: A non-biased approach for assessing the language of young children. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Temple University, Philadelphia.
35. Peña, E., Quinn, R., & Iglesias, A. (1992). The application of dynamic methods to language assessment: A nonbiased procedure. The Journal of Special Education, 26(3), 269-280.
36. Robinson-Zañartu, C. (1993, November). Dynamic assessment and mediated learning interventions. Seminar presented to the Interdisciplinary Collaboration and Training Project Bilingual School Psychologists and Speech-Language Pathologists, San Diego State University, San Diego, CA. CTB/McGraw-Hill Book Company. (1987). Spanish Assessment of Basic Education Monterey, CA: Author.
37. Taylor,O., & Payne, K. (1983). Culturally valid testing: A proactive approach. Topics in Language Disorders, 3(3), 8-19.
38. Vygotsky, L. (1986). Thought and language. (A. Kozulin, Ed. and Trans.) Cambridge: MIT Press. (Original work published 1934).
39. Wade, K. M., & Haynes, W. O. (1989). Dynamic assessment of spontaneous and cue responses in adult-directed and child-directed play: A statistical and descriptive study. Child Language Teaching and Therapy, 5, 157-173.
40. Woodcock, R. W. (1981). Woodcock language proficiency battery: Spanish form. Chicago, IL: Riverside Publishing.
41. Woodcock,R.M. & Johnson, M.B. (1981, 1988). Batería Woodcock Psico-Educativa en Español. (The Woodcock-Johnson Psychoeducational Battery. Allen, TX: DLM Teaching Resources.