AUDIO-VISUAL SPEECH PERCEPTION WITHOUT TRADITIONAL SPEECH CUES: A SECOND REPORT

ESCA Workshop on Audio-Visual Speech Processing, AVSP 1997

Volumn , Issue , 1997, Pages 73-76

  Remez, Robert E ^a   Fellowes, Jennifer M ^a   Pisoni, David B ^b   Goh, Winston D ^b   Rubin, Philip E ^c  

^a Barnard College of Columbia University   (United States)

^b INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c HASKINS LABORATORIES   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AUDIO SIGNAL PROCESSING; SPEECH COMMUNICATION; SPEECH PROCESSING; VIDEO RECORDING;

ACOUSTIC SIGNALS; AUDIO-VISUAL INTEGRATION; AUDIO-VISUAL SPEECH; GESTALT PSYCHOLOGIES; MULTI-MODAL; PERCEPTUAL ORGANIZATION; SINEWAVES; SPECTRAL PROPERTIES; SPEECH PERCEPTION; SPEECH SIGNALS;

AUDITION;

EID: 0040980686     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (15)

1. Bernstein, L. E., Coulter, D. C, O'Connell, M. P., Eberhardt, S. P., & Demorest, M. E. (1992). Vibrotactile and haptic speech codes. Lecture presented at the Second International Conference on Tactile Aids, Hearing Aids, & Cochlear Implants. Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden, June 9-11, 1992.
2. Bradlow, A. B., Torretta, G. M., & Pisoni, D. B. (1996). Intelligibility of normal speech I: Global and fine-grained acoustic-phonetic talker characteristics. Speech Communication, 20, 255-272.
3. Breeuwer, M., & Plomp, R. (1985). Speechreading supplemented with formant-frequency information from voiced speech. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 11, 314-317.
4. Bregman, A. S. (1990). Auditory Scene Analysis. Cambridge: MIT Press.
5. Broadbent, D. E., & Ladefoged, P. (1957). On the fusion of sounds reaching divergent sense organs. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 29, 708-710.
6. Green, K. P., & Miller, J. L. (1985). On the role of visual rate information in phonetic perception. Perception & Psychophysics, 38, 269-276.
7. Julesz, B., & Hirsh, I. J. (1972). Visual and auditory perception: An essay of comparison. In E. E. Denes and P. B. Denes (Eds.), Human Communication: A Unified View (pp. 283-340). New York: McGraw-Hill.
8. Massaro, D. W. (1994). Psychological aspects of speech perception: Implications for research and theory. In M. A. Gernsbacher (Ed.)., Handbook of Psycholinguistics (pp. 219-263). New York: Academic Press.
9. Remez, R. E., Rubin, P. E., Berns, S. M., Pardo, J. S., & Lang, J. M. (1994). On the perceptual organization of speech. Psychological Review, 101, 129-156.
10. Remez, R. E., Rubin, P. E., Pisoni, D. B., & Carrell T. D. (1981). Speech perception without traditional speech cues. Science, 212, 947-950.
11. Rosen, S. M., Fourcin, A. J., & Moore, B. C. J. (1981). Voice pitch as an aid to lip-reading. Nature, 291, 150-152.
12. Rubin, P. E. (1980). Sinewave synthesis. Internal memorandum, Haskins Laboratories, New Haven, Connecticut.
13. Saldana, H. M., Fellowes J. M., Remez, R. E., & Pisoni, D. B. (1996) Audio-visual speech perception without speech cues: A first report. In D. G. Stork and M. E. Hennecke (Eds.), Speechreading by Man and Machines: Models, Systems and Applications (pp. 145-151). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
14. Welch, R. B., & Warren, D. H. (1980). Immediate perceptual response to intersensory discrepancy. Psychological Bulletin, 88, 638-667.
15. Wertheimer, M. (1923). Untersuchungen zur Lehre von der Gestalt, II. Psycholigische Forschung, 4, 301-350. [Reprinted in translation as "Laws of organization in perceptual forms," in W. D. Ellis (Ed.), A Sourcebook of Gestalt Psychology (pp. 71-88). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1938.]