Amending the ABM treaty

Survival

Volumn 42, Issue 1, 2000, Pages 29-

  Wilkening, Dean A ^a  

^a STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0040971927     PISSN: 00396338     EISSN: 14682699     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/survival/42.1.29     Document Type: Note

References (10)

1. Michael C. Sirak, ‘NMD Officials Face Task To Merge Radars, Current Warning System’, Inside Missile Defence, vol. 5, no. 22, 3 November 1999, pp. 14–16.
2. Michael C. Sirak, ‘BMDO: NMD “C3” Architecture Could Feature Up To Nine X-band Radars’, Inside Missile Defence, vol. 5, no. 10, 19 May 1999, pp. 13–14.
3. Walter B. Slocomb, Testimony Before the House Armed Services Committee, Hearing on National Missile Defence, 13 October 1999; available at http://www.house.gov/hasc/testimony/106thcongress/99-10-13slocombe.htm
4. John Donnelly, ‘Cost of Initial NMDto Rise by 50 Percent’, Defence Week, 20 December 1999, p. 1.
5. Michael C. Sirak, ‘BMDO, Boeing Consider Modification of NMD Ground- Based Interceptor’, Inside Missile Defence, vol. 5, no. 5, 10 March 1999, p. 1.
6. Matthew Bunn, Foundation for the Future: The ABM Treaty and National Security (Washington DC: Arms Control Association, 1990), pp. 63–66.
7. Michael C. Sirak, ‘First Step Toward Sea-Based NMD Should Be A Detailed Concept Study’, Inside Missile Defence, vol. 5, no. 13, 30 June 1999, pp. 15–16
8. Michael R. Gordon, ‘US Seeking To Renegotiate A Landmark Missile Treaty’, New York Times, 17 October 1999, p. 1.
9. Dean A. Wilkening, ‘The Future of Russia’s Strategic Nuclear Force’, Survival, vol. 40, no. 3, Autumn 1998, pp. 89–111.
10. Richard L. Garwin, ‘Cooperative Ballistic Missile Defence’, 17 November 1999, available at http://www.fas.org/rlg/