Causality as an influence on hindsight bias: An empirical examination of judges' evaluation of professional audit judgment

Journal of Accounting and Public Policy

Volumn 17, Issue 2, 1998, Pages 143-167

  Jennings, Marianne M ^a   Lowe, D Jordan ^b   Reckers, Philip M J ^a  

^a ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b PAMPLIN COLLEGE OF BUSINESS   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0040944376     PISSN: 02784254     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0278-4254(97)10003-5     Document Type: Article

References (90)

1. Abselon, R., 1991. Messy accounting, Forbes 148 (8), 172, 174.
2. Alexander J.C. Do the merits matter? A study of settlements in securities class actions. Stanford Law Review. 43(3):1991;497-598.
3. AICPA, 1993. Meeting the Financial Reporting Needs of the Future: A Public Commitment From the Public Accounting Profession. American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, New York.
4. Anderson, L., 1986. Is hindsight a fair judge of foresight: An experimental investigation of second-guessing. Ph.D. dissertation, Loyola University of Chicago.
5. Anderson, J.C., Jennings, M.M., Lowe, D.J., Reckers, P.M.J., 1997. The mitigation of hindsight bias in judges' evaluation of auditor decisions. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory 16 (2), 20-39.
6. Anderson J.C., Jennings M.M., Reckers P.M.J. The presence of hindsight bias in peer and judicial evaluation in public accounting litigation. Tort and Insurance Law Journal. 28(3):1993;462-479.
7. Anderson J.C., Lowe D.J., Reckers P.M.J. Evaluation of auditor decisions: Hindsight bias effects and the expectation gap. Journal of Economic Psychology. 14(4):1993;711-737.
8. Anderson, B., Maletta, M., Wright, A., 1996. Perceptions of auditor responsibility: Views of the judiciary and the profession. Working paper.
9. Arkes H.R., Wortmann R.L., Saville P.D., Harkness A.R. Hindsight bias among physicians weighing the likelihood of diagnoses. Journal of Applied Psychology. 66(2):1981;252-254.
10. Arthur Andersen & Co., Coopers & Lybrand, Deloitte & Touche, Ernst & Young, KPMG Peat Marwick, Price Waterhouse., 1992. A Liability Crisis in the United States: Impact on the Accounting Profession, A Statement of Position.
11. Balachandran B.V. Introduction: Auditor's legal liability in the United States. Journal of Economic and Management Strategy. 2(3):1993;333-338.
12. Baron J., Hershey J.C. Outcome bias in decision evaluation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 54(4):1988;569-579.
13. Berton, L., 1992. Numbers game: How Miniscribe got its auditor's blessing on questionable sales. The Wall Street Journal 219 (95), A1, A6.
14. Berton, L., 1993. SEC rule forces more disclosure. The Wall Street Journal. 222 (115), B1, B2.
15. Black, H.C., 1990. Black's Law Dictionary. West Publishing Co, St. Paul, MN.
16. Bodenhausen G.V. Second-guessing the jury: Stereotypic and hindsight biases in perceptions of court cases. Journal of Applied Social Psychology. 20(13):1990;1112-1121.
17. Boyll J.R. Psychological, cognitive, personality, and interpersonal factors in jury verdicts. Law and Psychology Review. 15:1991;163-184.
18. Brown C.E., Solomon I. Effects of outcome information on evaluations of managerial decisions. The Accounting Review. 62(3):1987;564-577.
19. Brown C.E., Solomon I. An experimental investigation of explanations for outcome effects on appraisals of capital-budgeting decisions. Contemporary Accounting Research. 10(1):1993;84-117.
20. Brown R.S., Williams C.W., Lees-Haley P.R. The effects of hindsight bias and causal attribution on human response to environmental events. Journal of Applied Social Psychology. 24(8):1994;661-674.
21. Buchman T.A. An effect of hindsight on predicting bankruptcy with accounting information. Accounting, Organizations and Society. 10(3):1985;267-285.
22. Buckless F.A., Peace R.L. The influence of the source of professional standards on juror decision making. The Accounting Review. 68(1):1993;164-175.
23. Bursztajn H., Hamm R.M., Gutheil T.G., Brodsky A. The decision-analytic approach to medical malpractice law. Medical Decision Making. 4(4):1984;401-414.
24. Carcello J.V., Palmrose Z. Auditor litigation and modified reporting on bankrupt clients. Journal of Accounting Research. 32(suppl):1994;1-30.
25. Casper J.D., Benedict K., Kelly J.R. Cognitions, attitudes and decision-making in search and seizure cases. Journal of Applied Social Psychology. 18(2):1988;93-113.
26. Casper J.D., Benedict K., Perry J.L. Juror decision making, attitudes and the hindsight bias. Law and Human Behavior. 13(3):1989;291-310.
27. Causey Jr., D.Y., Causey, S.A., 1991. Duties and Liabilities of Public Accountants. Accountant's Press, Starksville, MS.
28. Cave G. Extensions of accountants' liability for negligence: One step closer to a new implied warranty of results. University of Colorado Law Review. 56(2):1985;265-287.
29. Chaiken A.L., Darley J.M. Victim or perpetrator? Defensive attribution of responsibility and the need for order and justice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 25(2):1973;268-275.
30. Christensen-Szalanski J.J., Fobian-Willham C.S. The hindsight bias: A meta-analysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 48(1):1991;147-168.
31. Cloyd, C.B., Frederickson, J.R., Hill, J.W., 1995. The effects of legal cost allocation rules and auditors' reputations for settling on non-meritorious suits against auditors. Working paper.
32. Cloyd C.B., Frederickson J.R., Hill J.W. Motivating factors in lawsuits against independent auditors: Experimental evidence on the importance of causality. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy. 15(3):1996;185-218.
33. Dixon, W.J., Massey Jr., F.J., 1983. Introduction to Statistical Analysis, 4th ed. McGraw-Hill, New York.
34. Dopuch N., King R.R. Negligence versus strict liability regimes in auditing: An experimental investigation. The Accounting Review. 67(1):1992;97-120.
35. Elliot R.K. Accountants' liability: Researchable issues. Journal of Economics and Management Strategy. 2(3):1993;385-394.
36. Escott v. BarChris Construction Corp., 1968. 283 F. Supp. (S.D.N.Y. 1968), pp. 643-707.
37. Fischhoff, B., 1975. Hindsight ≠ foresight: The effect of outcome knowledge on judgment under uncertainty. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1 (3), 288-299.
38. Fischhoff, B., 1982. Debiasing. In: Kahneman, D., Slovic, P., Tversky, A. (Eds)., Judgment Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases. Cambridge University Press, New York, pp. 422-444.
39. Fisher J., Selling T.I. The outcome effect in performance evaluation: Decision process observability and consensus. Behavioral Research in Accounting. 5:1993;58-77.
40. Hawkins, S.A., Hastie, R., 1990. Hindsight: Biased judgments of past events after the outcomes are known Psychological Bulletin 107 (3), 311-327.
41. Helleloid, R.T., 1985. Hindsight bias and judgments by tax professionals. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Minnesota.
42. Hershey J.C., Baron J. Judgment by outcomes: When is it justified? Organization Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 53(1):1992;89-93.
43. Hershey J.C., Baron J. Judgment by outcomes: When is it warranted? Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 62(1):1995;127.
44. Hill, J.W. Metzger, M.B., Schatzberg, J.W., 1993. Auditing's emerging legal peril under the national surety doctrine: A program for research. Accounting Horizons 7 (1), 12-28.
45. Hoch S.J., Loewenstein G.F. Outcome feedback: Hindsight and information. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition. 15(4):1989;605-619.
46. Holloway, J.A., Ingberman, D.E., King, R.R., 1995. Settlement incentives under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934: Do merits matter? Working paper.
47. Janoff-Bulman R., Timko C., Carli L.L. Cognitive biases in blaming the victim. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. 21(2):1985;161-177.
48. Jennings M.M., Kneer D.C., Reckers P.M.J. Selected auditor communications and perceptions of legal liability. Contemporary Accounting Research. 7(2):1991;449-465.
49. Jennings M.M., Kneer D.C., Reckers P.M.J. The significance of audit decision aids and pre-case jurists' attitudes on perceptions of audit firm culpability and liability. Contemporary Accounting Research. 9(2):1993;489-507.
50. Kagehiro D.K., Taylor R.B., Laufer W.S., Harland A.T. Hindsight bias and third-party consenters to warrantless police searches. Law and Human Behavior. 15(3):1991;305-314.
51. Kinney Jr., W.R., 1993. Auditor's liability: Opportunities for research. Journal of Economics and Management Strategy 2 (3), 349-360.
52. Kramer G.P., Kerr N.L. Laboratory simulation and bias in the study of juror behavior. Law and Human Behavior. 13(1):1989;89-99.
53. Kripke H. Some reactions and some down-to-earth reflections on accountants' liability - A general discussion. Journal of Accounting, Auditing, and Finance. 3(4):1988;359-367.
54. Lawrence J.E., Cerf D. Management and reporting of environmental liabilities. Management Accounting. 77(2):1995;48-54.
55. Leary M.R. Hindsight distortion and the 1980 presidential election. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 8(2):1982;257-263.
56. Lipe M.G. Analyzing the variance investigation decision: The effects of outcomes, mental accounting and framing. The Accounting Review. 68(4):1993;748-764.
57. Lowe, D.J., Reckers, P.M.J., 1994. The effects of hindsight bias on jurors' evaluations of auditor decisions. Decision Sciences 25 (3), 401-426.
58. Lowy, M., 1991. High Rollers: Inside the Savings and Loan Debacle. Praeger, New York.
59. Mark M.M., Mellor S. Effect of self-relevance of an event on hindsight bias: The foreseeability of a layoff. Journal of Applied Psychology. 76(4):1991;569-577.
60. Mark M.M., Mellor S. We don't expect it happened: On Mazursky and Ofir's (1990) purported reversal of the hindsight bias. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 57(2):1994;247-252.
61. Mazursky D., Ofir C. I could never have expected it to happen: The reversal of the hindsight bias. Organizational Behavior and Human Decisions Processes. 46(1):1990;20-33.
62. Mazursky D., Ofir C. "I knew it all along" under all conditions? or possibly "I could not have expected it to happen" under some conditions. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 66(2):1996;237-240.
63. McMurray S. Monsanto doubles liability provision for treating toxic waster to. $ 245 million The Wall Street Journal. 219(57):1992;B2.
64. Mednick R., Peck J.J. Proportionality: A much-needed solution to the accountant's legal liability crisis. Valparaiso University Law Review. 28(3):1994;867-918.
65. Menon K., Williams D.D. The insurance hypothesis and market prices. The Accounting Review. 69(2):1994;327-342.
66. Mitchell T.R., Kalb L.S. Effects of outcome knowledge and outcome valence on supervisors' evaluations. Journal of Applied Psychology. 66(5):1981;604-612.
67. Neter, J., Wasserman, W., Kutner, M., 1985. Applied Linear Statistical Models. Irwin Publishing Co., Homewood, IL.
68. Palmrose Z. Trials of legal disputes involving independent auditors: Some empirical evidence. Journal of Accounting Research. 29(suppl):1991;149-185.
69. Palmrose Z. The joint and several vs. proportionate liability debate: An empirical investigation of audit-related litigation. Stanford Journal of Law, Business and Finance. 1:1994;53-72.
70. Pennington N., Hastie R. Evidence evaluation in complex decision making. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 51(2):1986;242-258.
71. Pennington N., Hastie R. Explanation-based decision making: Effects of memory structure on judgment. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition. 14(3):1988;521-533.
72. Pennington N., Hastie R. Explaining the evidence: Tests of the story model for juror decision making. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 62(2):1992;189-206.
73. Pennington, N., Hastie, R., 1993. The story model for juror decision making. In: Hastie, R. (Ed.), Inside the Juror. The Psychology of Juror Decision Making. Cambridge University Press, New York.
74. Poythress N.G., Wiener R., Schumacher J.E. Reframing the medical malpractice tort reform debate: Social science research implications for non-economic reforms. Law and Psychology Review. 16:1992;65-112.
75. Prosser and Keeton on Torts, 1985. 5th ed., section 170. West Publishing Co., St. Paul, MN.
76. Reimers J.L., Butler S.A. The effect of outcome knowledge on auditors' judgmental evaluations. Accounting, Organizations and Society. 17(2):1992;185-194.
77. Restatement (Second) of Torts, 1977. American Law Institute, St. Paul, MN.
78. Rosenthal, R., Rosnow, R.L., 1985. Contrast Analysis: Focused Comparisons in the Analysis of Variance. Cambridge University Press, New York.
79. Ross L., Lepper M.R., Strack F., Steinmetz J. Social explanation and social expectation: Effects of real and hypothetical explanations on subjective likelihood. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 35(11):1977;817-829.
80. Schkade D.A., Kilbourne L.M. Expectation-outcome consistency and hindsight bias. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 49(1):1991;105-123.
81. Slovic P., Fischhoff B. On the psychology of experimental surprises. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 3(4):1977;544-551.
82. Staloch v. Holm, 1907. 111 N.W., pp. 264-269.
83. Teig v. St. John's Hospital, 1963. 387 P. 2d., pp. 527-536.
84. Trabasso T., van den Broek P. Causal thinking and the representation of narrative events. Journal of Memory and Language. 24(5):1985;612-630.
85. United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), 1981. Accounting Series Release No. 292. SEC Docket 8, pp. 1346-1367.
86. Verplanken B., Pieters R.G.M. Individual differences in reverse hindsight bias: I never thought something like Chernobyl would happen, Did I? Journal of Behavioral Decision Making. 1(3):1988;131-147.
87. Wallace, W.A., 1980. The Economic Role of the Audit in Free and Regulated Markets. Touche Ross, New York.
88. Wasserman, D., Lempert, R.O., Hastie, R., 1991. Hindsight and Causality. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 17 (1), 30-35.
89. Weinbach L.A. The liability crisis: Its impact on clients. Journal of Economics and Management Strategy. 2(3):1993;361-366.
90. Zuckerman M. Attribution of success and failure revisited, or: The motivational bias is alive and well in attribution theory. Journal of Personality. 47(2):1979;245-287.