Archaeological theory in France and Britain

Antiquity

Volumn 73, Issue 279, 1999, Pages 155-161

  Scarre, Chris ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Archaeological theory; British archaeology; French archaeology; New archaeology; Post processualism

Indexed keywords

EID: 0040888980     PISSN: 0003598X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S0003598X00087962     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. AUDOUZE, F., & A. LEROI-GOURHAN. 1981. France: a continental insularity, World Archaeology 13: 170-89.
2. BINTLIFF, J. 1991. Post-modernism, rhetoric and scholasticism at TAG: the current state of British archaeological theory, Antiquity 65: 274-8.
3. CLARKE, D.L. 1970. Beaker pottery of Great Britain and Ireland. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 1973. Archaeology: the loss of innocence, Antiquity 47: 6-18.
4. CLARKE, D.L. 1970. Beaker pottery of Great Britain and Ireland. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 1973. Archaeology: the loss of innocence, Antiquity 47: 6-18.
5. CLEUZIOU, S. & J.-P. DEMOULE. 1980. Situation de l'archéologie théorique, Les Nouvelles de l'Archéologie: 7-15
6. CLEUZIOU, S., A. COUDART, J.-P. DEMOULE & A. SCHNAPP. 1991. The use of theory in French archaeology, in I. Hodder (ed.), Archaeological theory in Europe: The last three decades: 91-128. London: Routledge.
7. COUDART, A. 1998. André Leroi-Gourhan (1911-1986), in T. Murray (ed.), Archaeologists: a biographical encyclopedia: ??page nos??. New York (NY): Garland Press.
8. DANIEL, G. & C. RENFREW. 1988. The idea of prehistory. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
9. DIAZ-ANDREU, M. & T. CHAMPION (ed.). 1996. Nationalism and archaeology in Europe. London: UCL Press.
10. GARDIN, J.-C. 1970. Archéologie et calculateurs: problèmes mathématiques et sémiologiques. Paris: CNRS. 1980. Archaeological constructs. An aspect of theoretical archaeology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press/Paris: Editions de la Maison des Sciences de l'Homme.
11. GARDIN, J.-C. 1970. Archéologie et calculateurs: problèmes mathématiques et sémiologiques. Paris: CNRS. 1980. Archaeological constructs. An aspect of theoretical archaeology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press/Paris: Editions de la Maison des Sciences de l'Homme.
12. HODDER, I. 1981. Review of 'Archaeological constructs. An aspect of theoretical archaeology' by Jean-Claude Gardin, Antiquity 55: 60-61.
13. KOHL, P.L. & C. FAWCETT (ed.). 1995. Nationalism, politics, and the practice of archaeology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
14. LEROI-GOURHAN, A. 1964. Le geste et la parole 1: Technique et langage. Paris: Albin Michel. 1965a. Le Geste et la Parole 2: La mémoire et les rhythmes. Paris: Albin Michel. 1965b. Préhistoire de l'art occidental. Paris: Mazenod. 1982. The dawn of European art. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
15. LEROI-GOURHAN, A. 1964. Le geste et la parole 1: Technique et langage. Paris: Albin Michel. 1965a. Le Geste et la Parole 2: La mémoire et les rhythmes. Paris: Albin Michel. 1965b. Préhistoire de l'art occidental. Paris: Mazenod. 1982. The dawn of European art. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
16. LEROI-GOURHAN, A. 1964. Le geste et la parole 1: Technique et langage. Paris: Albin Michel. 1965a. Le Geste et la Parole 2: La mémoire et les rhythmes. Paris: Albin Michel. 1965b. Préhistoire de l'art occidental. Paris: Mazenod. 1982. The dawn of European art. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
17. LEROI-GOURHAN, A. 1964. Le geste et la parole 1: Technique et langage. Paris: Albin Michel. 1965a. Le Geste et la Parole 2: La mémoire et les rhythmes. Paris: Albin Michel. 1965b. Préhistoire de l'art occidental. Paris: Mazenod. 1982. The dawn of European art. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
18. OLIVIER, L. Forthcoming. L'archéologie française et le Régime de Vichy (1940-1944), Journal of European Archaeology.
19. OLIVIER, L. & A. COUDART. 1995. French tradition and the central place of history in the human sciences, in Ucko (ed.): 363-81.
20. SCHNAPP, A. 1981. Les Annales et l'archéologie: une rencontre difficile, Mélanges de l'Ecole Française de Rome: Antiquités 93: 469-78. 1996. French archaeology: between national identity and cultural identity, in M. Diaz-Andreu & T. Champion (ed.), Nationalism and archaeology in Europe: 48-67. London: UCL Press.
21. SCHNAPP, A. 1981. Les Annales et l'archéologie: une rencontre difficile, Mélanges de l'Ecole Française de Rome: Antiquités 93: 469-78. 1996. French archaeology: between national identity and cultural identity, in M. Diaz-Andreu & T. Champion (ed.), Nationalism and archaeology in Europe: 48-67. London: UCL Press.
22. SONNEVILLE BORDES, D. DE. 1960. Le Paléolithique supérieure en Périgord. Bordeaux: Delmas.
23. THOMAS, J. 1995. Where are we now? Archaeological theory in the 1990s, in Ucko (ed.): 343-62.
24. TRIGGER, B.G. 1989. A history of archaeological thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
25. UCKO, P.J. (ed.). 1995. Theory in archaeology: A world perspective. London: Routledge.
26. WATSON, P.J., S.A. LEBLANC & C.L. REDMAN. 1971. Explanation in archaeology: An explicitly scientific approach. New York (NY): Academic Press.